Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Risk perception and environmental risks management in environment and health protection context [Percepce rizika a řízení ekologických rizik v kontextu veřejného zdravotnictví]

Vladimír Bencko, John M. Quinn

. 2013 ; 9 (3) : 28-31.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium elektronický zdroj

Typ dokumentu práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14040339

Risk Assessment: The qualified expert assessment of potential ecological/environmental and health risks rising from the planned industrial, transport and waste treatment facilities and other construction activities becomes indispensable. Whereas the initial phase of risk assessment, its identification or potential human exposure are of pure scientific character, the actual risk assessment increasingly assumes the arbitrary aspects (e.g. safety coefficients), risk communication, its control and management by way of psychological aspects; collective decision making then becomes a hotly debated political issue. Risk Perception: When evaluating perception of environmental risks, psychosocial and psychosomatic factors may be of fundamental importance. This is the case in particular where our knowledge of the true health consequences of exposure to given factor is incomplete or its action is within the range of values where we do not anticipate the measurable biological effect. This applies not only in the case of the indoor environment related complains but also e.g. to that of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and electro-ionic microclimate. A serious consequence found in the syndrome of mass hysteria is the fact that due to differently motivated disinformation, part of the population can suffer from some psychosomatic symptoms. Those imply objective suffering and deterioration quality of life for those affected. Challenges for Prevention: The prevention of such conditions can either be systematic: early educational or popularisation campaigns, specific health education orientated to the development of industrial, transportation, or other types of constructions, and integration of the local civic activities in the program. The purpose of this should not be a cheap belittling of the risk but reasonable explaining of its acceptable rate, and also the likely advantage to benefit from the realization of the structures. Any later efforts to inform the public about the true state of affairs is usually accepted with distrust and disbelief, in belief this information had been well-paid by the government, industry and market forces, the military or some other institution trying to camouflage the actual condition.

Percepce rizika a řízení ekologických rizik v kontextu veřejného zdravotnictví

Risk perception and environmental risks management in environment and health protection context [elektronický zdroj] /

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14040339
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140515064658.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
140106s2013 xr fs 000 0eng||
009      
eAR
024    7_
$a 10.24105/ejbi.2013.09.3.6 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng $b cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Bencko, Vladimír, $d 1938- $7 jn19990218004 $u Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Risk perception and environmental risks management in environment and health protection context $h [elektronický zdroj] / $c Vladimír Bencko, John M. Quinn
246    31
$a Percepce rizika a řízení ekologických rizik v kontextu veřejného zdravotnictví
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Risk Assessment: The qualified expert assessment of potential ecological/environmental and health risks rising from the planned industrial, transport and waste treatment facilities and other construction activities becomes indispensable. Whereas the initial phase of risk assessment, its identification or potential human exposure are of pure scientific character, the actual risk assessment increasingly assumes the arbitrary aspects (e.g. safety coefficients), risk communication, its control and management by way of psychological aspects; collective decision making then becomes a hotly debated political issue. Risk Perception: When evaluating perception of environmental risks, psychosocial and psychosomatic factors may be of fundamental importance. This is the case in particular where our knowledge of the true health consequences of exposure to given factor is incomplete or its action is within the range of values where we do not anticipate the measurable biological effect. This applies not only in the case of the indoor environment related complains but also e.g. to that of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and electro-ionic microclimate. A serious consequence found in the syndrome of mass hysteria is the fact that due to differently motivated disinformation, part of the population can suffer from some psychosomatic symptoms. Those imply objective suffering and deterioration quality of life for those affected. Challenges for Prevention: The prevention of such conditions can either be systematic: early educational or popularisation campaigns, specific health education orientated to the development of industrial, transportation, or other types of constructions, and integration of the local civic activities in the program. The purpose of this should not be a cheap belittling of the risk but reasonable explaining of its acceptable rate, and also the likely advantage to benefit from the realization of the structures. Any later efforts to inform the public about the true state of affairs is usually accepted with distrust and disbelief, in belief this information had been well-paid by the government, industry and market forces, the military or some other institution trying to camouflage the actual condition.
650    12
$a primární prevence $x metody $7 D011322
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ekologie $x metody $7 D004463
650    12
$a psychosomatické poruchy $x etiologie $7 D011602
650    12
$a zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe $7 D007722
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a zohlednění rizika $7 D020379
650    _2
$a vystavení vlivu životního prostředí $x prevence a kontrola $x škodlivé účinky $7 D004781
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Quinn, John M. $u Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$t European journal for biomedical informatics $x 1801-5603 $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2013), s. 28-31 $w MED00173462
856    41
$u http://www.ejbi.org/img/ejbi/2013/3/Bencko_en.pdf $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný
856    41
$u http://www.ejbi.org/img/ejbi/2013/3/Bencko_cs.pdf $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $z 0 $y 4
990    __
$a 20140105160254 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140515065349 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1004746 $s 838844
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 9 $c 3 $d 28-31 $i 1801-5603 $m European Journal for Biomedical Informatics $n Eur. J. Biomed. Inform. (Praha) $x MED00173462
LZP    __
$c NLK185 $d 20140203 $a NLK 2014-03/vt

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...