-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Micafungin as empirical antifungal therapy in hematological patients: a retrospective, multicenter study in the Czech and Slovak Republics
Z. Racil, M. Toskova, I. Kocmanova, L. Buresova, M. Kouba, L. Drgona, L. Masarova, T. Guman, E. Tothova, J. Gabzdilova, K. Forsterova, J. Haber, B. Ziakova, E. Bojtarova, M. Rolencova, S. Timilsina, P. Cetkovsky, J. Mayer,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antifungální látky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- antitumorózní látky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- echinokandiny škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- hematologické nádory komplikace farmakoterapie MeSH
- horečka farmakoterapie etiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lipopeptidy škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- neutropenie chemicky indukované farmakoterapie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Slovenská republika MeSH
The objective of this retrospective, multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin as empirical antifungal therapy during febrile neutropenia (FN) in 73 hematological patients from six centers in two countries. All patients received 100 mg of micafungin/day. The overall favorable response rate (RR) was 64.8% when the resolution of fever during neutropenia was included in the response criteria and 84.5% when excluded. A significantly lower favorable RR in patients with persistent fever and non-specific pulmonary infiltrates compared to patients with persistent fever only (82.8 vs. 52.4%, respectively; p = 0.011) was not found when resolution of fever was not included in the composite endpoint criteria (93.1 vs. 78.6%, respectively; p = 0.180). Breakthrough fungal disease developed in 2.7% of patients. Treatment was discontinued in 16.4% of cases. Only one patient (1.4%) discontinued therapy due to an adverse event. Posaconazole prophylaxis improved favorable RR when defervescence was included as composite endpoint criterion (p = 0.047), but not when it was excluded (p = 0.485). However, neutrophil recovery did not influence favorable RR (p = 0.803 and p = 0.112, respectively). These data suggest that micafungin is safe and effective as an empirical therapy in patients with FN.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14040994
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170411120901.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140107s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3109/10428194.2012.729057 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23088794
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Racil, Zdenek
- 245 10
- $a Micafungin as empirical antifungal therapy in hematological patients: a retrospective, multicenter study in the Czech and Slovak Republics / $c Z. Racil, M. Toskova, I. Kocmanova, L. Buresova, M. Kouba, L. Drgona, L. Masarova, T. Guman, E. Tothova, J. Gabzdilova, K. Forsterova, J. Haber, B. Ziakova, E. Bojtarova, M. Rolencova, S. Timilsina, P. Cetkovsky, J. Mayer,
- 520 9_
- $a The objective of this retrospective, multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin as empirical antifungal therapy during febrile neutropenia (FN) in 73 hematological patients from six centers in two countries. All patients received 100 mg of micafungin/day. The overall favorable response rate (RR) was 64.8% when the resolution of fever during neutropenia was included in the response criteria and 84.5% when excluded. A significantly lower favorable RR in patients with persistent fever and non-specific pulmonary infiltrates compared to patients with persistent fever only (82.8 vs. 52.4%, respectively; p = 0.011) was not found when resolution of fever was not included in the composite endpoint criteria (93.1 vs. 78.6%, respectively; p = 0.180). Breakthrough fungal disease developed in 2.7% of patients. Treatment was discontinued in 16.4% of cases. Only one patient (1.4%) discontinued therapy due to an adverse event. Posaconazole prophylaxis improved favorable RR when defervescence was included as composite endpoint criterion (p = 0.047), but not when it was excluded (p = 0.485). However, neutrophil recovery did not influence favorable RR (p = 0.803 and p = 0.112, respectively). These data suggest that micafungin is safe and effective as an empirical therapy in patients with FN.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antifungální látky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000935
- 650 _2
- $a antitumorózní látky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
- 650 _2
- $a echinokandiny $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D054714
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a horečka $x farmakoterapie $x etiologie $7 D005334
- 650 _2
- $a hematologické nádory $x komplikace $x farmakoterapie $7 D019337
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lipopeptidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D055666
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neutropenie $x chemicky indukované $x farmakoterapie $7 D009503
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Toskova, Martina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kocmanova, Iva $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Buresova, Lucie $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kouba, Michal $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Drgona, Lubos $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Masarova, Lucia $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Guman, Tomas $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Tothova, Elena $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Gabzdilova, Julia $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Forsterová, Kristina $u - $7 xx0209605
- 700 1_
- $a Haber, Jan $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Ziakova, Barbora $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Bojtarova, Eva $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Rolencova, Monika $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Timilsina, Shira $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Cetkovsky, Petr $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Mayer, Jiri $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003140 $t Leukemia & lymphoma $x 1029-2403 $g Roč. 54, č. 5 (2013), s. 1042-1047
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23088794 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170411121200 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1005390 $s 839506
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 54 $c 5 $d 1042-1047 $i 1029-2403 $m Leukemia & lymphoma $n Leuk Lymphoma $x MED00003140
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140107