-
Something wrong with this record ?
ELISA kit for peanut protein determination: collaborative study
H. Lexmaulová, D. Gabrovská, J. Rysová, F. Stumr, K. Netusilová, M. Blazková, H. Bulawová, J. Brychta, Z. Subrtová, J. Pavelka, S. Iametti, JA. Del Barco, JM. Quesada, ES. Pardo, IP. Resa, K. Takkinen, ML. Laukkanen, L. Piknová, T. Langerholc, A....
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Arachis chemistry MeSH
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay methods MeSH
- Cooperative Behavior MeSH
- Limit of Detection MeSH
- Reagent Kits, Diagnostic * MeSH
- Plant Proteins analysis MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
A collaborative study in 10 laboratories was performed to validate an ELISA method developed for the quantitative determination of peanut protein in foods. The ELISA kit used for this study is based on rabbit polyclonal antibody. This kit does not produce any false-positive results or cross-reactivity with a broad range of peanut-free food matrixes. All participants obtained the peanut ELISA kit with standard operational procedures, a list of samples, the samples, and a protocol for recording test results. The study included 15 food samples. Three food matrix samples of zero peanut content showed peanut protein content lower than the first standard (0.10 mg/kg). Three samples with peanut declared as an ingredient revealed peanut protein content outside the calibration curve (absorbance was above the highest standard) in all laboratories, and three samples had the peanut content reported either above the highest standard or within the calibration curve, depending on the laboratory. Six samples with peanut declared as an ingredient gave the peanut protein content within the calibration curve. Only these six samples, together with a positive control sample (CS2), were used for statistical evaluation. The statistical tests (Cochran, Grubbs, and Mandel) and analysis of variance were used for the evaluation of the collaborative study results. Repeatability and reproducibility limits, as well as an LOQ (LOQcollaborative 0.22 mg peanut proteins/kg) and an LOD (LODcollaborative 0.07 mg peanut proteinslkg) for the kit were calculated.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14050735
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140411115626.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140401s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5740/jaoacint.12-474 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24282944
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Lexmaulová, Hana
- 245 10
- $a ELISA kit for peanut protein determination: collaborative study / $c H. Lexmaulová, D. Gabrovská, J. Rysová, F. Stumr, K. Netusilová, M. Blazková, H. Bulawová, J. Brychta, Z. Subrtová, J. Pavelka, S. Iametti, JA. Del Barco, JM. Quesada, ES. Pardo, IP. Resa, K. Takkinen, ML. Laukkanen, L. Piknová, T. Langerholc, A. Cencic, S. Barsová, P. Cuhra, J. Plicka,
- 520 9_
- $a A collaborative study in 10 laboratories was performed to validate an ELISA method developed for the quantitative determination of peanut protein in foods. The ELISA kit used for this study is based on rabbit polyclonal antibody. This kit does not produce any false-positive results or cross-reactivity with a broad range of peanut-free food matrixes. All participants obtained the peanut ELISA kit with standard operational procedures, a list of samples, the samples, and a protocol for recording test results. The study included 15 food samples. Three food matrix samples of zero peanut content showed peanut protein content lower than the first standard (0.10 mg/kg). Three samples with peanut declared as an ingredient revealed peanut protein content outside the calibration curve (absorbance was above the highest standard) in all laboratories, and three samples had the peanut content reported either above the highest standard or within the calibration curve, depending on the laboratory. Six samples with peanut declared as an ingredient gave the peanut protein content within the calibration curve. Only these six samples, together with a positive control sample (CS2), were used for statistical evaluation. The statistical tests (Cochran, Grubbs, and Mandel) and analysis of variance were used for the evaluation of the collaborative study results. Repeatability and reproducibility limits, as well as an LOQ (LOQcollaborative 0.22 mg peanut proteins/kg) and an LOD (LODcollaborative 0.07 mg peanut proteinslkg) for the kit were calculated.
- 650 _2
- $a Arachis $x chemie $7 D010367
- 650 _2
- $a kooperační chování $7 D003299
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $x metody $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a limita detekce $7 D057230
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné proteiny $x analýza $7 D010940
- 650 12
- $a reagenční diagnostické soupravy $7 D011933
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Gabrovská, Dana $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Rysová, Jana $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Stumr, Frantisek $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Netusilová, Katerina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Blazková, Martina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Bulawová, Hana $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Brychta, Josef $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Subrtová, Zdenka $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Pavelka, Jiri $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Iametti, Stefania $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Del Barco, Jorge Antonio Guisantes $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Quesada, Jorge Martinez $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Pardo, Esther Sunen $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Resa, Idoia Postigo $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Takkinen, Kristiina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Laukkanen, Marja-Leena $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Piknová, Lubica $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Langerholc, Tomaz $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Cencic, Avrelija $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Barsová, Sona $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Cuhra, Petr $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Plicka, Jan $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002515 $t Journal of AOAC International $x 1060-3271 $g Roč. 96, č. 5 (2013), s. 1041-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24282944 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140401 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140411115716 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1017871 $s 849315
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 96 $c 5 $d 1041-7 $i 1060-3271 $m Journal of AOAC International $n J AOAC Int $x MED00002515
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140401