-
Something wrong with this record ?
Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions
T. Banasiewicz, K. Horbacka, J. Karoń, S. Malinger, F. Antos, S. Rudzki, Z. Kala, Z. Stojcev, J. Kössi, P. Krokowicz,
Language English Country Poland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
ProQuest Central
from 2006-01-01 to 2022-07-31
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-01-01 to 2022-07-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesions, the fibrotic bands that form between the surfaces in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, still pose a difficult clinical challenge. AIM: To evaluate the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System (PEG ester amine solution and a buffer solution) in reducing post-operative adhesion formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study. A total of 11 subjects diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were randomized: 8 to the SprayShield™ arm and 3 to the control arm. SprayShield™ was applied on the viscera directly under the midline peritoneal incision and at the site of ileostomy. During the follow-up surgery, the incidence, extent, and severity of post-operative adhesion formation were evaluated, as well as the time required to mobilize the ileal loop. RESULTS: In patients who received SprayShield™ the time required to mobilize the ileal loop at the ileostomy closure was slightly shorter and the incidence and severity of adhesions were somewhat lower vs. control subjects (NS). CONCLUSIONS: SprayShield™ was found to be easy to use, safe, and quick to apply, and performed well in adherence and conformity. The incidence and severity of adhesions were lower for SprayShield™ subjects vs. control subjects, but due to the limited number of patients there are not enough data to confirm the effectiveness of the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in prevention of adhesions.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14051290
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140410103324.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140401s2013 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5114/wiitm.2011.34884 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24501599
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Banasiewicz, Tomasz
- 245 10
- $a Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions / $c T. Banasiewicz, K. Horbacka, J. Karoń, S. Malinger, F. Antos, S. Rudzki, Z. Kala, Z. Stojcev, J. Kössi, P. Krokowicz,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesions, the fibrotic bands that form between the surfaces in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, still pose a difficult clinical challenge. AIM: To evaluate the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System (PEG ester amine solution and a buffer solution) in reducing post-operative adhesion formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study. A total of 11 subjects diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were randomized: 8 to the SprayShield™ arm and 3 to the control arm. SprayShield™ was applied on the viscera directly under the midline peritoneal incision and at the site of ileostomy. During the follow-up surgery, the incidence, extent, and severity of post-operative adhesion formation were evaluated, as well as the time required to mobilize the ileal loop. RESULTS: In patients who received SprayShield™ the time required to mobilize the ileal loop at the ileostomy closure was slightly shorter and the incidence and severity of adhesions were somewhat lower vs. control subjects (NS). CONCLUSIONS: SprayShield™ was found to be easy to use, safe, and quick to apply, and performed well in adherence and conformity. The incidence and severity of adhesions were lower for SprayShield™ subjects vs. control subjects, but due to the limited number of patients there are not enough data to confirm the effectiveness of the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in prevention of adhesions.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Horbacka, Karolina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Karoń, Jacek $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Malinger, Stanisław $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Antos, Frantisek $u - $7 gn_A_00007526
- 700 1_
- $a Rudzki, Sławomir $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kala, Zdenek $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Stojcev, Zoran $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kössi, Jyrki $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Krokowicz, Piotr $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176919 $t Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques / kwartalnik pod patronatem Sekcji Wideochirurgii TChP oraz Sekcji Chirurgii Bariatrycznej TChP $x 1895-4588 $g Roč. 8, č. 4 (2013), s. 301-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24501599 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140401 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140410103414 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1018426 $s 849870
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 8 $c 4 $d 301-9 $i 1895-4588 $m Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Mało Inwazyjne $n Wideochir. Inne Tech. Mało Inwazyjne $x MED00176919
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140401