Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions

T. Banasiewicz, K. Horbacka, J. Karoń, S. Malinger, F. Antos, S. Rudzki, Z. Kala, Z. Stojcev, J. Kössi, P. Krokowicz,

. 2013 ; 8 (4) : 301-9.

Language English Country Poland

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesions, the fibrotic bands that form between the surfaces in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, still pose a difficult clinical challenge. AIM: To evaluate the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System (PEG ester amine solution and a buffer solution) in reducing post-operative adhesion formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study. A total of 11 subjects diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were randomized: 8 to the SprayShield™ arm and 3 to the control arm. SprayShield™ was applied on the viscera directly under the midline peritoneal incision and at the site of ileostomy. During the follow-up surgery, the incidence, extent, and severity of post-operative adhesion formation were evaluated, as well as the time required to mobilize the ileal loop. RESULTS: In patients who received SprayShield™ the time required to mobilize the ileal loop at the ileostomy closure was slightly shorter and the incidence and severity of adhesions were somewhat lower vs. control subjects (NS). CONCLUSIONS: SprayShield™ was found to be easy to use, safe, and quick to apply, and performed well in adherence and conformity. The incidence and severity of adhesions were lower for SprayShield™ subjects vs. control subjects, but due to the limited number of patients there are not enough data to confirm the effectiveness of the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in prevention of adhesions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14051290
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140410103324.0
007      
ta
008      
140401s2013 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5114/wiitm.2011.34884 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24501599
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Banasiewicz, Tomasz
245    10
$a Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions / $c T. Banasiewicz, K. Horbacka, J. Karoń, S. Malinger, F. Antos, S. Rudzki, Z. Kala, Z. Stojcev, J. Kössi, P. Krokowicz,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesions, the fibrotic bands that form between the surfaces in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, still pose a difficult clinical challenge. AIM: To evaluate the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System (PEG ester amine solution and a buffer solution) in reducing post-operative adhesion formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study. A total of 11 subjects diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were randomized: 8 to the SprayShield™ arm and 3 to the control arm. SprayShield™ was applied on the viscera directly under the midline peritoneal incision and at the site of ileostomy. During the follow-up surgery, the incidence, extent, and severity of post-operative adhesion formation were evaluated, as well as the time required to mobilize the ileal loop. RESULTS: In patients who received SprayShield™ the time required to mobilize the ileal loop at the ileostomy closure was slightly shorter and the incidence and severity of adhesions were somewhat lower vs. control subjects (NS). CONCLUSIONS: SprayShield™ was found to be easy to use, safe, and quick to apply, and performed well in adherence and conformity. The incidence and severity of adhesions were lower for SprayShield™ subjects vs. control subjects, but due to the limited number of patients there are not enough data to confirm the effectiveness of the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in prevention of adhesions.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Horbacka, Karolina $u -
700    1_
$a Karoń, Jacek $u -
700    1_
$a Malinger, Stanisław $u -
700    1_
$a Antos, Frantisek $u - $7 gn_A_00007526
700    1_
$a Rudzki, Sławomir $u -
700    1_
$a Kala, Zdenek $u -
700    1_
$a Stojcev, Zoran $u -
700    1_
$a Kössi, Jyrki $u -
700    1_
$a Krokowicz, Piotr $u -
773    0_
$w MED00176919 $t Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques / kwartalnik pod patronatem Sekcji Wideochirurgii TChP oraz Sekcji Chirurgii Bariatrycznej TChP $x 1895-4588 $g Roč. 8, č. 4 (2013), s. 301-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24501599 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140401 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140410103414 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1018426 $s 849870
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 8 $c 4 $d 301-9 $i 1895-4588 $m Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Mało Inwazyjne $n Wideochir. Inne Tech. Mało Inwazyjne $x MED00176919
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140401

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...