Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Statistical SPECT processing in MRI-negative epilepsy surgery

V. Sulc, S. Stykel, DP. Hanson, BH. Brinkmann, DT. Jones, DR. Holmes, RA. Robb, ML. Senjem, BP. Mullan, RE. Watson, D. Horinek, GD. Cascino, LC. Wong-Kisiel, JW. Britton, EL. So, GA. Worrell,

. 2014 ; 82 (11) : 932-939.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NT11536 MZ0 CEP Register

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of statistical SPECT processing over traditional subtraction methods, we compared ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (ISAS), statistical ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (STATISCOM), and subtraction ictal-interictal SPECT coregistered with MRI (SISCOM) in patients with MRI-negative focal temporal lobe epilepsy (nTLE) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (nETLE). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 49 consecutive cases of drug-resistant focal epilepsy that had a negative preoperative MRI and underwent interictal and ictal SPECT prior to resective epilepsy surgery. Interictal and ictal SPECT scans were analyzed using SISCOM, ISAS, and STATISCOM to create hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion maps for each patient. Reviewers blinded to clinical data and the SPECT analysis method marked the site of probable seizure origin and indicated their confidence in the localization. RESULTS: In nTLE and nETLE, the hyperperfusions detected by STATISCOM (71% nTLE, 57% nETLE) and ISAS (67% nTLE, 53% nETLE) were more often colocalized with surgery resection site compared to SISCOM (38% nTLE, 36% nETLE). In nTLE, localization of the hyperperfusion to the region of surgery was associated with an excellent outcome for STATISCOM (p = 0.005) and ISAS (p = 0.027), but not in SISCOM (p = 0.071). This association was not present in nETLE for any method. CONCLUSION: In an unselected group of patients with normal MRI and focal epilepsy, SPM-based methods of SPECT processing showed better localization of SPECT hyperperfusion to surgical resection site and higher interobserver agreement compared to SISCOM. These results show the benefit of statistical SPECT processing methods and further highlight the challenge of nETLE.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14063716
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200515095407.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000209 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24532274
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šulc, Vlastimil $u From the Departments of Neurology (V.S., B.H.B., D.T.J., G.D.C., L.C.W.-K., J.W.B., E.L.S., G.A.W.) and Radiology (M.L.S., B.P.M., R.E.W.) and Biomedical Imaging Resource (S.S., D.P.H., D.R.H., R.A.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; International Clinical Research Center (V.S., D.H.), St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno; and the Department of Neurology (V.S.), 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0200633
245    10
$a Statistical SPECT processing in MRI-negative epilepsy surgery / $c V. Sulc, S. Stykel, DP. Hanson, BH. Brinkmann, DT. Jones, DR. Holmes, RA. Robb, ML. Senjem, BP. Mullan, RE. Watson, D. Horinek, GD. Cascino, LC. Wong-Kisiel, JW. Britton, EL. So, GA. Worrell,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of statistical SPECT processing over traditional subtraction methods, we compared ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (ISAS), statistical ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (STATISCOM), and subtraction ictal-interictal SPECT coregistered with MRI (SISCOM) in patients with MRI-negative focal temporal lobe epilepsy (nTLE) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (nETLE). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 49 consecutive cases of drug-resistant focal epilepsy that had a negative preoperative MRI and underwent interictal and ictal SPECT prior to resective epilepsy surgery. Interictal and ictal SPECT scans were analyzed using SISCOM, ISAS, and STATISCOM to create hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion maps for each patient. Reviewers blinded to clinical data and the SPECT analysis method marked the site of probable seizure origin and indicated their confidence in the localization. RESULTS: In nTLE and nETLE, the hyperperfusions detected by STATISCOM (71% nTLE, 57% nETLE) and ISAS (67% nTLE, 53% nETLE) were more often colocalized with surgery resection site compared to SISCOM (38% nTLE, 36% nETLE). In nTLE, localization of the hyperperfusion to the region of surgery was associated with an excellent outcome for STATISCOM (p = 0.005) and ISAS (p = 0.027), but not in SISCOM (p = 0.071). This association was not present in nETLE for any method. CONCLUSION: In an unselected group of patients with normal MRI and focal epilepsy, SPM-based methods of SPECT processing showed better localization of SPECT hyperperfusion to surgical resection site and higher interobserver agreement compared to SISCOM. These results show the benefit of statistical SPECT processing methods and further highlight the challenge of nETLE.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a mozek $x patologie $x patofyziologie $x radioizotopová diagnostika $7 D001921
650    _2
$a elektroencefalografie $7 D004569
650    12
$a epilepsie $x patologie $x radioizotopová diagnostika $x chirurgie $7 D004827
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a jednofotonová emisní výpočetní tomografie $7 D015899
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Stykel, Samantha
700    1_
$a Hanson, Dennis P
700    1_
$a Brinkmann, Benjamin H
700    1_
$a Jones, David T
700    1_
$a Holmes, David R., $d 1945- $7 skuk0003088
700    1_
$a Robb, Richard A
700    1_
$a Senjem, Matthew L
700    1_
$a Mullan, Brian P
700    1_
$a Watson, Robert E
700    1_
$a Horinek, Daniel
700    1_
$a Cascino, Gregory D
700    1_
$a Wong-Kisiel, Lily C
700    1_
$a Britton, Jeffrey W
700    1_
$a So, Elson L
700    1_
$a Worrell, Gregory A
773    0_
$w MED00003491 $t Neurology $x 1526-632X $g Roč. 82, č. 11 (2014), s. 932-939
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24532274 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200515095404 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031200 $s 862448
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 82 $c 11 $d 932-939 $i 1526-632X $m Neurology $n Neurology $x MED00003491
GRA    __
$a NT11536 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...