Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial

I. Bernat, D. Horak, J. Stasek, M. Mates, J. Pesek, P. Ostadal, V. Hrabos, J. Dusek, J. Koza, Z. Sembera, M. Brtko, O. Aschermann, M. Smid, P. Polansky, A. Al Mawiri, J. Vojacek, J. Bis, O. Costerousse, OF. Bertrand, R. Rokyta,

. 2014 ; 63 (10) : 964-72.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14063849

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare radial and femoral approaches in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators experienced in both access sites. BACKGROUND: The exact clinical benefit of the radial compared to the femoral approach remains controversial. METHODS: STEMI-RADIAL (ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated by RADIAL or femoral approach) was a randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 707 patients referred for STEMI <12 h of symptom onset were randomized in 4 high-volume radial centers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of major bleeding and vascular access site complications at 30 days. The rate of net adverse clinical events (NACE) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding/vascular complications. Access site crossover, contrast volume, duration of intensive care stay, and death at 6 months were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 1.4% of the radial group (n = 348) and 7.2% of the femoral group (n = 359; p = 0.0001). The NACE rate was 4.6% versus 11.0% (p = 0.0028), respectively. Crossover from radial to femoral approach was 3.7%. Intensive care stay (2.5 ± 1.7 days vs. 3.0 ± 2.9 days, p = 0.0038) as well as contrast utilization (170 ± 71 ml vs. 182 ± 60 ml, p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the radial group. Mortality in the radial and femoral groups was 2.3% versus 3.1% (p = 0.64) at 30 days and 2.3% versus 3.6% (p = 0.31) at 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI by operators experienced in both access sites, the radial approach was associated with significantly lower incidence of major bleeding and access site complications and superior net clinical benefit. These findings support the use of the radial approach in primary PCI as first choice after proper training. (Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [STEMI-RADIAL]; NCT01136187).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14063849
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180322203253.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1651 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24211309
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Bernat, Ivo $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ivobernat@gmail.com.
245    10
$a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial / $c I. Bernat, D. Horak, J. Stasek, M. Mates, J. Pesek, P. Ostadal, V. Hrabos, J. Dusek, J. Koza, Z. Sembera, M. Brtko, O. Aschermann, M. Smid, P. Polansky, A. Al Mawiri, J. Vojacek, J. Bis, O. Costerousse, OF. Bertrand, R. Rokyta,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare radial and femoral approaches in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators experienced in both access sites. BACKGROUND: The exact clinical benefit of the radial compared to the femoral approach remains controversial. METHODS: STEMI-RADIAL (ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated by RADIAL or femoral approach) was a randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 707 patients referred for STEMI <12 h of symptom onset were randomized in 4 high-volume radial centers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of major bleeding and vascular access site complications at 30 days. The rate of net adverse clinical events (NACE) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding/vascular complications. Access site crossover, contrast volume, duration of intensive care stay, and death at 6 months were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 1.4% of the radial group (n = 348) and 7.2% of the femoral group (n = 359; p = 0.0001). The NACE rate was 4.6% versus 11.0% (p = 0.0028), respectively. Crossover from radial to femoral approach was 3.7%. Intensive care stay (2.5 ± 1.7 days vs. 3.0 ± 2.9 days, p = 0.0038) as well as contrast utilization (170 ± 71 ml vs. 182 ± 60 ml, p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the radial group. Mortality in the radial and femoral groups was 2.3% versus 3.1% (p = 0.64) at 30 days and 2.3% versus 3.6% (p = 0.31) at 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI by operators experienced in both access sites, the radial approach was associated with significantly lower incidence of major bleeding and access site complications and superior net clinical benefit. These findings support the use of the radial approach in primary PCI as first choice after proper training. (Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [STEMI-RADIAL]; NCT01136187).
650    _2
$a periferní katetrizace $x metody $7 D002406
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a arteria femoralis $7 D005263
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D009203
650    _2
$a koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D062645
650    _2
$a arteria radialis $7 D017534
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a míra přežití $x trendy $7 D015996
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Horak, David $u Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stasek, Josef $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mates, Martin $u Na Homolce Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pesek, Jan $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ostadal, Petr $u Na Homolce Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hrabos, Vlado $u Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dusek, Jaroslav $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Koza, Jiri $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sembera, Zdenek $u Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brtko, Miroslav $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Aschermann, Ondřej $u Na Homolce Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0073302 $4
700    1_
$a Smid, Michal $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Polansky, Pavel $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Al Mawiri, Abdul $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. $7 gn_A_00003164
700    1_
$a Vojacek, Jan $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bis, Josef $u University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Costerousse, Olivier $u Quebec Heart-Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
700    1_
$a Bertrand, Olivier F $u Quebec Heart-Lung Institute, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
700    1_
$a Rokyta, Richard $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00002964 $t Journal of the American College of Cardiology $x 1558-3597 $g Roč. 63, č. 10 (2014), s. 964-72
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24211309 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140710105458 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031333 $s 862581
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 63 $c 10 $d 964-72 $i 1558-3597 $m Journal of the American College of Cardiology $n J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. $x MED00002964
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace