-
Something wrong with this record ?
Influence of lower limb configuration on walking cost in Late Pleistocene humans
M. Hora, V. Sladek,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Anthropology, Physical MeSH
- Walking physiology MeSH
- Lower Extremity * anatomy & histology physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Leg Bones anatomy & histology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Neanderthals anatomy & histology MeSH
- Fossils * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
It has been proposed that Neandertals had about 30% higher gross cost of transport than anatomically modern humans (AMH) and that such difference implies higher daily energy demands and reduced foraging ranges in Neandertals. Thus, reduced walking economy could be among the factors contributing to the Neandertals' loss in competition with their anatomically modern successors. Previously, Neandertal walking cost had been estimated from just two parameters and based upon a pooled-sex sample. In the present study, we estimate sex-specific walking cost of Neandertals using a model accounting for body mass, lower limb length, lower limb proportions, and other features of lower limb configuration. Our results suggest that Neandertals needed more energy to walk a given distance than did AMH but the difference was less than half of that previously estimated in males and even far less pronounced in females. In contrast, comparison of the estimated walking cost adjusted to body mass indicates that Neandertals spent less energy per kilogram of body mass than AMH thanks to their lower limb configuration, males having 1-5% lower and females 1-3% lower mass-specific net cost of transport than AMH of the same sex. The primary cause of high cost of transport in Neandertal males is thus their great body mass, possibly a consequence of adaptation to cold, which was not fully offset by their cost-moderating lower limb configuration. The estimated differences in absolute energy spent for locomotion between Neandertal and AMH males would account for about 1% of previously estimated daily energy expenditure of Neandertal or AMH males.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074296
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141008101432.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.09.011 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24485350
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hora, Martin $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic. Electronic address: mrtnh@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Influence of lower limb configuration on walking cost in Late Pleistocene humans / $c M. Hora, V. Sladek,
- 520 9_
- $a It has been proposed that Neandertals had about 30% higher gross cost of transport than anatomically modern humans (AMH) and that such difference implies higher daily energy demands and reduced foraging ranges in Neandertals. Thus, reduced walking economy could be among the factors contributing to the Neandertals' loss in competition with their anatomically modern successors. Previously, Neandertal walking cost had been estimated from just two parameters and based upon a pooled-sex sample. In the present study, we estimate sex-specific walking cost of Neandertals using a model accounting for body mass, lower limb length, lower limb proportions, and other features of lower limb configuration. Our results suggest that Neandertals needed more energy to walk a given distance than did AMH but the difference was less than half of that previously estimated in males and even far less pronounced in females. In contrast, comparison of the estimated walking cost adjusted to body mass indicates that Neandertals spent less energy per kilogram of body mass than AMH thanks to their lower limb configuration, males having 1-5% lower and females 1-3% lower mass-specific net cost of transport than AMH of the same sex. The primary cause of high cost of transport in Neandertal males is thus their great body mass, possibly a consequence of adaptation to cold, which was not fully offset by their cost-moderating lower limb configuration. The estimated differences in absolute energy spent for locomotion between Neandertal and AMH males would account for about 1% of previously estimated daily energy expenditure of Neandertal or AMH males.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antropologie fyzická $7 D000885
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a zkameněliny $7 D005580
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kosti stehna a bérce $x anatomie a histologie $7 D007867
- 650 12
- $a dolní končetina $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D035002
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neandertálci $x anatomie a histologie $7 D059125
- 650 _2
- $a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sladek, Vladimir $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002718 $t Journal of human evolution $x 1095-8606 $g Roč. 67, č. - (2014), s. 19-32
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24485350 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141008101820 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042179 $s 873208
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 67 $c - $d 19-32 $i 1095-8606 $m Journal of Human Evolution $n J Hum Evol $x MED00002718
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006