-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men
JV. Valentova, K. Kleisner, J. Havlíček, J. Neustupa,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1993-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2004-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1993-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 1993-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 1992-02-01 do 2017-12-31
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- heterosexualita * MeSH
- homosexualita mužská * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mínění MeSH
- mužskost MeSH
- obličej * MeSH
- obličejové kosti anatomie a histologie MeSH
- pohlavní dimorfismus * MeSH
- sexuální chování MeSH
- ženskost MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Previous studies have shown that homosexual men differ from heterosexual men in several somatic traits and lay people accurately attribute sexual orientation based on facial images. Thus, we may predict that morphological differences between faces of homosexual and heterosexual individuals can cue to sexual orientation. The main aim of this study was to test for possible differences in facial shape between heterosexual and homosexual men. Further, we tested whether self-reported sexual orientation correlated with sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity attributed from facial images by independent raters. In Study 1, we used geometric morphometrics to test for differences in facial shape between homosexual and heterosexual men. The analysis revealed significant shape differences in faces of heterosexual and homosexual men. Homosexual men showed relatively wider and shorter faces, smaller and shorter noses, and rather massive and more rounded jaws, resulting in a mosaic of both feminine and masculine features. In Study 2, we tested the accuracy of sexual orientation judgment from standardized facial photos which were assessed by 80 independent raters. Binary logistic regression showed no effect of attributed sexual orientation on self-reported sexual orientation. However, homosexual men were rated as more masculine than heterosexual men, which may explain the misjudgment of sexual orientation. Thus, our results showed that differences in facial morphology of homosexual and heterosexual men do not simply mirror variation in femininity, and the stereotypic association of feminine looking men as homosexual may confound judgments of sexual orientation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074589
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141007103751.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10508-013-0194-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24132775
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Valentova, Jaroslava Varella $u Center for Theoretical Study, Charles University in Prague and The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Jilska 1, 11000, Prague 1, Czech Republic, valentova@cts.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men / $c JV. Valentova, K. Kleisner, J. Havlíček, J. Neustupa,
- 520 9_
- $a Previous studies have shown that homosexual men differ from heterosexual men in several somatic traits and lay people accurately attribute sexual orientation based on facial images. Thus, we may predict that morphological differences between faces of homosexual and heterosexual individuals can cue to sexual orientation. The main aim of this study was to test for possible differences in facial shape between heterosexual and homosexual men. Further, we tested whether self-reported sexual orientation correlated with sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity attributed from facial images by independent raters. In Study 1, we used geometric morphometrics to test for differences in facial shape between homosexual and heterosexual men. The analysis revealed significant shape differences in faces of heterosexual and homosexual men. Homosexual men showed relatively wider and shorter faces, smaller and shorter noses, and rather massive and more rounded jaws, resulting in a mosaic of both feminine and masculine features. In Study 2, we tested the accuracy of sexual orientation judgment from standardized facial photos which were assessed by 80 independent raters. Binary logistic regression showed no effect of attributed sexual orientation on self-reported sexual orientation. However, homosexual men were rated as more masculine than heterosexual men, which may explain the misjudgment of sexual orientation. Thus, our results showed that differences in facial morphology of homosexual and heterosexual men do not simply mirror variation in femininity, and the stereotypic association of feminine looking men as homosexual may confound judgments of sexual orientation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a obličej $7 D005145
- 650 _2
- $a obličejové kosti $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005147
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a ženskost $7 D057227
- 650 12
- $a heterosexualita $7 D020010
- 650 12
- $a homosexualita mužská $7 D018451
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mínění $7 D007600
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mužskost $7 D057228
- 650 12
- $a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální chování $7 D012725
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kleisner, Karel
- 700 1_
- $a Havlíček, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Neustupa, Jiří
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000562 $t Archives of sexual behavior $x 1573-2800 $g Roč. 43, č. 2 (2014), s. 353-61
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24132775 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141007104229 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042472 $s 873501
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 43 $c 2 $d 353-61 $i 1573-2800 $m Archives of sexual behavior $n Arch Sex Behav $x MED00000562
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006