-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of the cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation in humans
M. Horák, M. Handl, A. Podškubka, R. Kaňa, J. Adler, C. Povýšil
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2000
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2000
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2000
- MeSH
- Actins metabolism MeSH
- Arthroscopy MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials chemistry MeSH
- Biopsy MeSH
- Cell Differentiation MeSH
- Chondrocytes cytology transplantation MeSH
- Cartilage pathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Femur pathology MeSH
- Fibroblasts cytology MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Knee pathology MeSH
- Hyaluronic Acid analogs & derivatives chemistry MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- S100 Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Tissue Engineering methods MeSH
- Cell Transplantation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Our study compares the histological and immunohistochemical cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation. Our study cohort included 21 patients, comprising 19 men and two women with a mean age of 32 years, who were affected by single chondral lesions of the femoral condyles. These patients were enrolled in our study and treated with arthroscopic implantation of the tissue Hyalograft C and/or Brno culture. Brno culture bioengineered with a fibrin-based scaffold contains round cells showing features of differentiated chondrocytes expressing S-100 protein and α-smooth muscle actin. In contrast, in the case of Hyalograft C, the scaffold was made up of a fibrillar network composed of biomaterial fibres of the esters of hyaluronic acid and cells resembling fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and expressing only α-smooth muscle actin. The average size of the defects was 2.5 cm2. Patients were evaluated using the standardized guidelines of the International Knee Documentation Committee. During the comparison of bioptic samples obtained from both patient cohorts, we did not observe any important differences in the histological makeup of the newly formed cartilage. The histological analysis of these two groups of homogeneous patients shows that this bioengineered approach, under proper indications, may offer favourable and stable clinical results over time, in spite of the different matrix and cellular composition of the two transplants used.
Department of Orthopedics Teaching Hospital Na Bulovce Prague Czech Republic
Department of Orthopedics University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Department of Otorhinolaryngology General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Radiology Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Tissue Bank University Hospital Bohunice Brno Czech Republic
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14078169
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141107080344.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141105s2014 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24594051
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Horák, Martin, $d 1974- $7 xx0067192 $u Department of Radiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of the cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation in humans / $c M. Horák, M. Handl, A. Podškubka, R. Kaňa, J. Adler, C. Povýšil
- 520 9_
- $a Our study compares the histological and immunohistochemical cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation. Our study cohort included 21 patients, comprising 19 men and two women with a mean age of 32 years, who were affected by single chondral lesions of the femoral condyles. These patients were enrolled in our study and treated with arthroscopic implantation of the tissue Hyalograft C and/or Brno culture. Brno culture bioengineered with a fibrin-based scaffold contains round cells showing features of differentiated chondrocytes expressing S-100 protein and α-smooth muscle actin. In contrast, in the case of Hyalograft C, the scaffold was made up of a fibrillar network composed of biomaterial fibres of the esters of hyaluronic acid and cells resembling fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and expressing only α-smooth muscle actin. The average size of the defects was 2.5 cm2. Patients were evaluated using the standardized guidelines of the International Knee Documentation Committee. During the comparison of bioptic samples obtained from both patient cohorts, we did not observe any important differences in the histological makeup of the newly formed cartilage. The histological analysis of these two groups of homogeneous patients shows that this bioengineered approach, under proper indications, may offer favourable and stable clinical results over time, in spite of the different matrix and cellular composition of the two transplants used.
- 650 _2
- $a aktiny $x metabolismus $7 D000199
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a artroskopie $7 D001182
- 650 _2
- $a biokompatibilní materiály $x chemie $7 D001672
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a chrupavka $x patologie $7 D002356
- 650 _2
- $a buněčná diferenciace $7 D002454
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace buněk $x metody $7 D017690
- 650 _2
- $a chondrocyty $x cytologie $x transplantace $7 D019902
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a femur $x patologie $7 D005269
- 650 _2
- $a fibroblasty $x cytologie $7 D005347
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina hyaluronová $x analogy a deriváty $x chemie $7 D006820
- 650 _2
- $a koleno $x patologie $7 D007717
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a proteiny S100 $x metabolismus $7 D009418
- 650 _2
- $a tkáňové inženýrství $x metody $7 D023822
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Handl, Milan, $d 1961- $7 xx0064271 $u Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Podškubka, Aleš $7 xx0059925 $u Department of Orthopedics, Teaching Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kaňa, Radim, $d 1967- $7 xx0080461 $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Adler, Jiří, $d 1945- $7 xx0073305 $u Tissue Bank, University Hospital Bohunice, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Povýšil, Ctibor, $d 1943- $7 jn20001103579 $u Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011004 $t Folia biologica $x 0015-5500 $g Roč. 60, č. 1 (2014), s. 1-9
- 856 41
- $u https://fb.cuni.cz/file/5709/FB%2060%2001%2001-www.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 970 $c 89 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141105135105 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1046629 $s 877157
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 60 $c 1 $d 1-9 $i 0015-5500 $m Folia biologica (Praha) $n Folia biol. (Praha) $x MED00011004
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20141105