Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Serum cortisol seems to be a more appropriate marker for adrenocortical reserve evaluation in ACTH test in comparison to salivary cortisol

M. Kosák, V. Hána, M. Hill, K. Šimůnková, Z. Lacinová, M. Kršek, J. Marek

. 2014 ; 63 (2) : 229-236.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NT11277 MZ0 CEP Register

Salivary cortisol reflects the free fraction of serum cortisol. Monitoring salivary cortisol may be a promising alternative method for assessing serum cortisol in some clinical situations. We aimed to compare the reliability of salivary vs. serum cortisol during ACTH test. 84 subjects (mean age 63.2; 24-89 years; n=66 males) suspected for adrenocortical insufficiency underwent an ACTH test. Patients were divided based on peak serum cortisol into hypocortical group with cortisol <500 nmol/l and to reference group cortisol >500 nmol/l. Median serum cortisol levels in reference group were 445, 766, and 902 nmol/l at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, respectively, and in hypocortical group were 256, 394, and 453 nmol/l. Median salivary cortisol levels were 19.02, 40.02, and 62.1 nmol/l in reference group, and 9.60, 14.08, and 13.28 nmol/l in hypocortical group. Obtained values showed good correlation between serum and salivary cortisol (p<0.0001). The percentage of explained variability R(2) (coefficient of determination for linear model) representing a measure of agreement between experimental values and predictions for repeated measures ANOVA, was significantly higher (p=0.021) for serum cortisol (R2=93.4 %) when compared to the salivary cortisol (R2=89.3 %). A stronger discriminating power of serum versus salivary cortisol suggests that it seems to be slightly, but statistically significantly more appropriate marker of adrenocortical reserve in ACTH test.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15003894
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190826100449.0
007      
ta
008      
150128s2014 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.33549/physiolres.932602 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24397810
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kosák, Mikuláš $7 xx0105672 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Serum cortisol seems to be a more appropriate marker for adrenocortical reserve evaluation in ACTH test in comparison to salivary cortisol / $c M. Kosák, V. Hána, M. Hill, K. Šimůnková, Z. Lacinová, M. Kršek, J. Marek
520    9_
$a Salivary cortisol reflects the free fraction of serum cortisol. Monitoring salivary cortisol may be a promising alternative method for assessing serum cortisol in some clinical situations. We aimed to compare the reliability of salivary vs. serum cortisol during ACTH test. 84 subjects (mean age 63.2; 24-89 years; n=66 males) suspected for adrenocortical insufficiency underwent an ACTH test. Patients were divided based on peak serum cortisol into hypocortical group with cortisol <500 nmol/l and to reference group cortisol >500 nmol/l. Median serum cortisol levels in reference group were 445, 766, and 902 nmol/l at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, respectively, and in hypocortical group were 256, 394, and 453 nmol/l. Median salivary cortisol levels were 19.02, 40.02, and 62.1 nmol/l in reference group, and 9.60, 14.08, and 13.28 nmol/l in hypocortical group. Obtained values showed good correlation between serum and salivary cortisol (p<0.0001). The percentage of explained variability R(2) (coefficient of determination for linear model) representing a measure of agreement between experimental values and predictions for repeated measures ANOVA, was significantly higher (p=0.021) for serum cortisol (R2=93.4 %) when compared to the salivary cortisol (R2=89.3 %). A stronger discriminating power of serum versus salivary cortisol suggests that it seems to be slightly, but statistically significantly more appropriate marker of adrenocortical reserve in ACTH test.
650    _2
$a Addisonova nemoc $x krev $x diagnóza $7 D000224
650    _2
$a adrenokortikotropní hormon $x analýza $x krev $7 D000324
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a biologické markery $x analýza $x krev $7 D015415
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hydrokortison $x analýza $x krev $7 D006854
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a sliny $x chemie $7 D012463
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hána, Václav, $d 1956- $7 xx0018430 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hill, Martin, $d 1962- $7 mzk2005304431 $u Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šimůnková, Kateřina $7 xx0143534 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lacinová, Zdeňka $7 xx0062138 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kršek, Michal $7 xx0046428 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Marek, Josef, $d 1936-2019 $7 nlk19990073526 $u Third Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 63, č. 2 (2014), s. 229-236
856    41
$u http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20150128 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190826100707 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1060954 $s 886649
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 63 $c 2 $d 229-236 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
GRA    __
$a NT11277 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20150128

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...