Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis

P. Suchomel, L. Jurák, J. Antinheimo, J. Pohjola, J. Stulik, HJ. Meisel, M. Čabraja, C. Woiciechowsky, B. Bruchmann, I. Shackleford, R. Arregui, S. Sola,

. 2014 ; 23 (5) : 1124-34.

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008289
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 1997 do 2014
PubMed Central od 1997 do 2014
Europe PubMed Central od 1997 do 2014
ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: Recent studies describe significant rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) after cervical total disc replacement (CTDR). Little is known about the reasons, and one aspect that requires further in vivo investigation is the biomechanical alteration after CTDR and the role of the implant-related centre of rotation (CORi) in particular. The role of the sagittal position of the CORi on functional outcome in two versions of a semi-constrained disc prosthesis with sagittally different CORi is the topic of this study. METHODS: Patients were candidates for single-level CTDR between C3 and C7 who suffered from CDDD and received a standard or flat version of activ C™ (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen). Clinical and radiographic assessments were determined preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Radiographic examinations were performed independently using specialized quantitative motion analysis software. RESULTS: Clinical outcome improved significantly regarding NDI as well as VAS on neck and arm pain with no differences in mean improvement by study group. Segmental angle measures show a significantly better lordotic alignment for both groups after surgery, but the degree of correction achieved is higher in the flat group. Correlation analysis proves that the more anterior the CORi is positioned, the higher the lordotic correction is achieved (Pearson rho -0.385). Segmental ROM decreased in the standard group but was maintained for flat implants. At present, our data do not demonstrate a correlation between CORi and ROM at 2 years. Two years after surgery, severe HO grade III-IV was present in 31.6 % standard and 13.1 % flat cases with significant differences. Grouping according to HO severity showed comparable sagittal positions of CORi for flat implants but a more posterior position in the severe HO group for standard implants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the influence of CORi location on segmental alignment, kinematics and HO for a semi-constrained CTDR, but it also indicates a multifactorial process.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008289
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150324095712.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00586-014-3223-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24554334
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Suchomel, P $u Neurocentre, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 10, 46063, Liberec, Czech Republic, petr.suchomel@nemlib.cz.
245    10
$a Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis / $c P. Suchomel, L. Jurák, J. Antinheimo, J. Pohjola, J. Stulik, HJ. Meisel, M. Čabraja, C. Woiciechowsky, B. Bruchmann, I. Shackleford, R. Arregui, S. Sola,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Recent studies describe significant rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) after cervical total disc replacement (CTDR). Little is known about the reasons, and one aspect that requires further in vivo investigation is the biomechanical alteration after CTDR and the role of the implant-related centre of rotation (CORi) in particular. The role of the sagittal position of the CORi on functional outcome in two versions of a semi-constrained disc prosthesis with sagittally different CORi is the topic of this study. METHODS: Patients were candidates for single-level CTDR between C3 and C7 who suffered from CDDD and received a standard or flat version of activ C™ (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen). Clinical and radiographic assessments were determined preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Radiographic examinations were performed independently using specialized quantitative motion analysis software. RESULTS: Clinical outcome improved significantly regarding NDI as well as VAS on neck and arm pain with no differences in mean improvement by study group. Segmental angle measures show a significantly better lordotic alignment for both groups after surgery, but the degree of correction achieved is higher in the flat group. Correlation analysis proves that the more anterior the CORi is positioned, the higher the lordotic correction is achieved (Pearson rho -0.385). Segmental ROM decreased in the standard group but was maintained for flat implants. At present, our data do not demonstrate a correlation between CORi and ROM at 2 years. Two years after surgery, severe HO grade III-IV was present in 31.6 % standard and 13.1 % flat cases with significant differences. Grouping according to HO severity showed comparable sagittal positions of CORi for flat implants but a more posterior position in the severe HO group for standard implants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the influence of CORi location on segmental alignment, kinematics and HO for a semi-constrained CTDR, but it also indicates a multifactorial process.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a krční obratle $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D002574
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a meziobratlová ploténka $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D007403
650    _2
$a lordóza $x radiografie $7 D008141
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a heterotopická osifikace $x etiologie $7 D009999
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a artroplastika meziobratlové ploténky $7 D059145
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jurák, L
700    1_
$a Antinheimo, J $7 gn_A_00007336
700    1_
$a Pohjola, J
700    1_
$a Stulik, J
700    1_
$a Meisel, H-J
700    1_
$a Čabraja, M
700    1_
$a Woiciechowsky, C
700    1_
$a Bruchmann, B
700    1_
$a Shackleford, I
700    1_
$a Arregui, R $7 gn_A_00008855
700    1_
$a Sola, S
773    0_
$w MED00001666 $t European spine journal official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society $x 1432-0932 $g Roč. 23, č. 5 (2014), s. 1124-34
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24554334 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150324100000 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065562 $s 891089
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 23 $c 5 $d 1124-34 $i 1432-0932 $m European spine journal $n Eur Spine J $x MED00001666
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...