-
Something wrong with this record ?
Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis
P. Suchomel, L. Jurák, J. Antinheimo, J. Pohjola, J. Stulik, HJ. Meisel, M. Čabraja, C. Woiciechowsky, B. Bruchmann, I. Shackleford, R. Arregui, S. Sola,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1997 to 2014
PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
Europe PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Total Disc Replacement MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Ossification, Heterotopic etiology MeSH
- Cervical Vertebrae radiography surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lordosis radiography MeSH
- Intervertebral Disc radiography surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
PURPOSE: Recent studies describe significant rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) after cervical total disc replacement (CTDR). Little is known about the reasons, and one aspect that requires further in vivo investigation is the biomechanical alteration after CTDR and the role of the implant-related centre of rotation (CORi) in particular. The role of the sagittal position of the CORi on functional outcome in two versions of a semi-constrained disc prosthesis with sagittally different CORi is the topic of this study. METHODS: Patients were candidates for single-level CTDR between C3 and C7 who suffered from CDDD and received a standard or flat version of activ C™ (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen). Clinical and radiographic assessments were determined preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Radiographic examinations were performed independently using specialized quantitative motion analysis software. RESULTS: Clinical outcome improved significantly regarding NDI as well as VAS on neck and arm pain with no differences in mean improvement by study group. Segmental angle measures show a significantly better lordotic alignment for both groups after surgery, but the degree of correction achieved is higher in the flat group. Correlation analysis proves that the more anterior the CORi is positioned, the higher the lordotic correction is achieved (Pearson rho -0.385). Segmental ROM decreased in the standard group but was maintained for flat implants. At present, our data do not demonstrate a correlation between CORi and ROM at 2 years. Two years after surgery, severe HO grade III-IV was present in 31.6 % standard and 13.1 % flat cases with significant differences. Grouping according to HO severity showed comparable sagittal positions of CORi for flat implants but a more posterior position in the severe HO group for standard implants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the influence of CORi location on segmental alignment, kinematics and HO for a semi-constrained CTDR, but it also indicates a multifactorial process.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008289
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150324095712.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2014 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00586-014-3223-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24554334
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Suchomel, P $u Neurocentre, Regional Hospital Liberec, Husova 10, 46063, Liberec, Czech Republic, petr.suchomel@nemlib.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis / $c P. Suchomel, L. Jurák, J. Antinheimo, J. Pohjola, J. Stulik, HJ. Meisel, M. Čabraja, C. Woiciechowsky, B. Bruchmann, I. Shackleford, R. Arregui, S. Sola,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Recent studies describe significant rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) after cervical total disc replacement (CTDR). Little is known about the reasons, and one aspect that requires further in vivo investigation is the biomechanical alteration after CTDR and the role of the implant-related centre of rotation (CORi) in particular. The role of the sagittal position of the CORi on functional outcome in two versions of a semi-constrained disc prosthesis with sagittally different CORi is the topic of this study. METHODS: Patients were candidates for single-level CTDR between C3 and C7 who suffered from CDDD and received a standard or flat version of activ C™ (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen). Clinical and radiographic assessments were determined preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Radiographic examinations were performed independently using specialized quantitative motion analysis software. RESULTS: Clinical outcome improved significantly regarding NDI as well as VAS on neck and arm pain with no differences in mean improvement by study group. Segmental angle measures show a significantly better lordotic alignment for both groups after surgery, but the degree of correction achieved is higher in the flat group. Correlation analysis proves that the more anterior the CORi is positioned, the higher the lordotic correction is achieved (Pearson rho -0.385). Segmental ROM decreased in the standard group but was maintained for flat implants. At present, our data do not demonstrate a correlation between CORi and ROM at 2 years. Two years after surgery, severe HO grade III-IV was present in 31.6 % standard and 13.1 % flat cases with significant differences. Grouping according to HO severity showed comparable sagittal positions of CORi for flat implants but a more posterior position in the severe HO group for standard implants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the influence of CORi location on segmental alignment, kinematics and HO for a semi-constrained CTDR, but it also indicates a multifactorial process.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a krční obratle $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D002574
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a meziobratlová ploténka $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D007403
- 650 _2
- $a lordóza $x radiografie $7 D008141
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a heterotopická osifikace $x etiologie $7 D009999
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 650 _2
- $a artroplastika meziobratlové ploténky $7 D059145
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jurák, L
- 700 1_
- $a Antinheimo, J $7 gn_A_00007336
- 700 1_
- $a Pohjola, J
- 700 1_
- $a Stulik, J
- 700 1_
- $a Meisel, H-J
- 700 1_
- $a Čabraja, M
- 700 1_
- $a Woiciechowsky, C
- 700 1_
- $a Bruchmann, B
- 700 1_
- $a Shackleford, I
- 700 1_
- $a Arregui, R $7 gn_A_00008855
- 700 1_
- $a Sola, S
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001666 $t European spine journal official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society $x 1432-0932 $g Roč. 23, č. 5 (2014), s. 1124-34
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24554334 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150324100000 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065562 $s 891089
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 23 $c 5 $d 1124-34 $i 1432-0932 $m European spine journal $n Eur Spine J $x MED00001666
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306