Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Multilocus detection of wolf x dog hybridization in italy, and guidelines for marker selection

E. Randi, P. Hulva, E. Fabbri, M. Galaverni, A. Galov, J. Kusak, D. Bigi, BČ. Bolfíková, M. Smetanová, R. Caniglia,

. 2014 ; 9 (1) : e86409.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008366

Hybridization and introgression can impact the evolution of natural populations. Several wild canid species hybridize in nature, sometimes originating new taxa. However, hybridization with free-ranging dogs is threatening the genetic integrity of grey wolf populations (Canis lupus), or even the survival of endangered species (e.g., the Ethiopian wolf C. simensis). Efficient molecular tools to assess hybridization rates are essential in wolf conservation strategies. We evaluated the power of biparental and uniparental markers (39 autosomal and 4 Y-linked microsatellites, a melanistic deletion at the β-defensin CBD103 gene, the hypervariable domain of the mtDNA control-region) to identify the multilocus admixture patterns in wolf x dog hybrids. We used empirical data from 2 hybrid groups with different histories: 30 presumptive natural hybrids from Italy and 73 Czechoslovakian wolfdogs of known hybrid origin, as well as simulated data. We assessed the efficiency of various marker combinations and reference samples in admixture analyses using 69 dogs of different breeds and 99 wolves from Italy, Balkans and Carpathian Mountains. Results confirmed the occurrence of hybrids in Italy, some of them showing anomalous phenotypic traits and exogenous mtDNA or Y-chromosome introgression. Hybridization was mostly attributable to village dogs and not strictly patrilineal. The melanistic β-defensin deletion was found only in Italian dogs and in putative hybrids. The 24 most divergent microsatellites (largest wolf-dog FST values) were equally or more informative than the entire panel of 39 loci. A smaller panel of 12 microsatellites increased risks to identify false admixed individuals. The frequency of F1 and F2 was lower than backcrosses or introgressed individuals, suggesting hybridization already occurred some generations in the past, during early phases of wolf expansion from their historical core areas. Empirical and simulated data indicated the identification of the past generation backcrosses is always uncertain, and a larger number of ancestry-informative markers is needed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008366
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150306133244.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0086409 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24466077
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Randi, Ettore $u Laboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy ; Department 18/Section of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
245    10
$a Multilocus detection of wolf x dog hybridization in italy, and guidelines for marker selection / $c E. Randi, P. Hulva, E. Fabbri, M. Galaverni, A. Galov, J. Kusak, D. Bigi, BČ. Bolfíková, M. Smetanová, R. Caniglia,
520    9_
$a Hybridization and introgression can impact the evolution of natural populations. Several wild canid species hybridize in nature, sometimes originating new taxa. However, hybridization with free-ranging dogs is threatening the genetic integrity of grey wolf populations (Canis lupus), or even the survival of endangered species (e.g., the Ethiopian wolf C. simensis). Efficient molecular tools to assess hybridization rates are essential in wolf conservation strategies. We evaluated the power of biparental and uniparental markers (39 autosomal and 4 Y-linked microsatellites, a melanistic deletion at the β-defensin CBD103 gene, the hypervariable domain of the mtDNA control-region) to identify the multilocus admixture patterns in wolf x dog hybrids. We used empirical data from 2 hybrid groups with different histories: 30 presumptive natural hybrids from Italy and 73 Czechoslovakian wolfdogs of known hybrid origin, as well as simulated data. We assessed the efficiency of various marker combinations and reference samples in admixture analyses using 69 dogs of different breeds and 99 wolves from Italy, Balkans and Carpathian Mountains. Results confirmed the occurrence of hybrids in Italy, some of them showing anomalous phenotypic traits and exogenous mtDNA or Y-chromosome introgression. Hybridization was mostly attributable to village dogs and not strictly patrilineal. The melanistic β-defensin deletion was found only in Italian dogs and in putative hybrids. The 24 most divergent microsatellites (largest wolf-dog FST values) were equally or more informative than the entire panel of 39 loci. A smaller panel of 12 microsatellites increased risks to identify false admixed individuals. The frequency of F1 and F2 was lower than backcrosses or introgressed individuals, suggesting hybridization already occurred some generations in the past, during early phases of wolf expansion from their historical core areas. Empirical and simulated data indicated the identification of the past generation backcrosses is always uncertain, and a larger number of ancestry-informative markers is needed.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a shluková analýza $7 D016000
650    _2
$a mitochondriální DNA $7 D004272
650    _2
$a psi $7 D004285
650    _2
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a genetické markery $7 D005819
650    _2
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    _2
$a populační genetika $7 D005828
650    _2
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    12
$a hybridizace genetická $7 D006824
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
650    12
$a multilokusová sekvenční typizace $7 D058885
650    _2
$a vlci $7 D019596
650    _2
$a chromozom Y $7 D014998
650    _2
$a beta-defensiny $x genetika $7 D023083
651    _2
$a Itálie $7 D007558
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hulva, Pavel $u Department of Zoology, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic ; Life Science Research Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fabbri, Elena $u Laboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Galaverni, Marco $u Laboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Galov, Ana $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
700    1_
$a Kusak, Josip $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
700    1_
$a Bigi, Daniele $u Department of Agricultural and Food Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
700    1_
$a Bolfíková, Barbora Černá $u Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Smetanová, Milena $u Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Caniglia, Romolo $u Laboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 9, č. 1 (2014), s. e86409
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24466077 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150306133515 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065639 $s 891166
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 9 $c 1 $d e86409 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace