Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Mycorrhizal symbiosis and local adaptation in Aster amellus: a field transplant experiment

H. Pánková, J. Raabová, Z. Münzbergová,

. 2014 ; 9 (4) : e93967.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Many plant populations have adapted to local soil conditions. However, the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is often overlooked in this context. Only a few studies have used reciprocal transplant experiments to study the relationships between soil conditions, mycorrhizal colonisation and plant growth. Furthermore, most of the studies were conducted under controlled greenhouse conditions. However, long-term field experiments can provide more realistic insights into this issue. We conducted a five-year field reciprocal transplant experiment to study the relationships between soil conditions, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth in the obligate mycotrophic herb Aster amellus. We conducted this study in two regions in the Czech Republic that differ significantly in their soil nutrient content, namely Czech Karst (region K) and Ceske Stredohori (region S). Plants that originated from region S had significantly higher mycorrhizal colonisation than plants from region K, indicating that the percentage of mycorrhizal colonisation has a genetic basis. We found no evidence of local adaptation in Aster amellus. Instead, plants from region S outperformed the plants from region K in both target regions. Similarly, plants from region S showed more mycorrhizal colonisation in all cases, which was likely driven by the lower nutrient content in the soil from that region. Thus, plant aboveground biomass and mycorrhizal colonisation exhibited corresponding differences between the two target regions and regions of origin. Higher mycorrhizal colonisation in the plants from region with lower soil nutrient content (region S) in both target regions indicates that mycorrhizal colonisation is an adaptive trait. However, lower aboveground biomass in the plants with lower mycorrhizal colonisation suggests that the plants from region K are in fact maladapted by their low inherent mycorrhizal colonization. We conclude that including mycorrhizal symbiosis in local adaptation studies may increase our understanding of the mechanisms by which plants adapt to their environment.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15014421
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150421092154.0
007      
ta
008      
150420s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0093967 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24709748
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pánková, Hana $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Mycorrhizal symbiosis and local adaptation in Aster amellus: a field transplant experiment / $c H. Pánková, J. Raabová, Z. Münzbergová,
520    9_
$a Many plant populations have adapted to local soil conditions. However, the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is often overlooked in this context. Only a few studies have used reciprocal transplant experiments to study the relationships between soil conditions, mycorrhizal colonisation and plant growth. Furthermore, most of the studies were conducted under controlled greenhouse conditions. However, long-term field experiments can provide more realistic insights into this issue. We conducted a five-year field reciprocal transplant experiment to study the relationships between soil conditions, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth in the obligate mycotrophic herb Aster amellus. We conducted this study in two regions in the Czech Republic that differ significantly in their soil nutrient content, namely Czech Karst (region K) and Ceske Stredohori (region S). Plants that originated from region S had significantly higher mycorrhizal colonisation than plants from region K, indicating that the percentage of mycorrhizal colonisation has a genetic basis. We found no evidence of local adaptation in Aster amellus. Instead, plants from region S outperformed the plants from region K in both target regions. Similarly, plants from region S showed more mycorrhizal colonisation in all cases, which was likely driven by the lower nutrient content in the soil from that region. Thus, plant aboveground biomass and mycorrhizal colonisation exhibited corresponding differences between the two target regions and regions of origin. Higher mycorrhizal colonisation in the plants from region with lower soil nutrient content (region S) in both target regions indicates that mycorrhizal colonisation is an adaptive trait. However, lower aboveground biomass in the plants with lower mycorrhizal colonisation suggests that the plants from region K are in fact maladapted by their low inherent mycorrhizal colonization. We conclude that including mycorrhizal symbiosis in local adaptation studies may increase our understanding of the mechanisms by which plants adapt to their environment.
650    _2
$a aklimatizace $x fyziologie $7 D000064
650    _2
$a Aster $x fyziologie $7 D031173
650    _2
$a mykorhiza $x růst a vývoj $7 D038821
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $7 D018517
650    _2
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
650    _2
$a symbióza $x fyziologie $7 D013559
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Raabová, Jana $u Department of Botany, National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic; Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 9, č. 4 (2014), s. e93967
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24709748 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150421092453 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1072002 $s 897299
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 9 $c 4 $d e93967 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...