Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Unipolar voltage abnormality is associated with greater left ventricular dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy

B. Aldhoon, DS. Frankel, MD. Hutchinson, DJ. Callans, AE. Epstein, S. Dixit, MP. Riley, D. Lin, FC. Garcia, GE. Supple, JM. Cooper, R. Bala, R. Deo, ES. Zado, FE. Marchlinski,

. 2014 ; 25 (3) : 293-8.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

INTRODUCTION: Following myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular function is determined by cardiac remodeling occurring in both infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium (NIM). Unipolar voltage mapping may detect remodeling changes in NIM that are associated with the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to identify (1) unipolar voltage characteristics in patients with chronic MI, and (2) association of voltage abnormalities with degree of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two groups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who underwent LV endocardial mapping during catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) between January 2010 and December 2012 were studied. The first group (19 males) had mild to moderate LVD (M-LVD, LVEF >35%) and was matched for age, sex, infarction size, and infarction location with 10 males who had severe LVD (S-LVD, LVEF <35%). Both bipolar and unipolar endocardial abnormal voltage areas were measured and compared between groups. Abnormal bipolar area was comparable in both groups (30 ± 8% in the S-LVD group vs 28 ± 8% in the M-LVD group; P = 0.5). Total abnormal unipolar voltage area was significantly larger in the S-LVD group (57 ± 14% vs 43 ± 13%; P = 0.02). The abnormal unipolar voltage area within the normal bipolar voltage area was greater in the S-LVD group (26 ± 11% vs 15 ± 16%; P = 0.03). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an 18.0% cut-off value for abnormal unipolar area within NIM identified severe LVD, with 90% sensitivity and 79% specificity (area under the curve 0.821). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICM and severe LVD have larger areas of unipolar voltage abnormality in the noninfarcted tissue than patients with M-LVD.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15014577
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200401144333.0
007      
ta
008      
150420s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jce.12315 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24237590
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Aldhoon, Bashar $u Cardiovascular Division, Electrophysiology Section, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 gn_A_00003665
245    10
$a Unipolar voltage abnormality is associated with greater left ventricular dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy / $c B. Aldhoon, DS. Frankel, MD. Hutchinson, DJ. Callans, AE. Epstein, S. Dixit, MP. Riley, D. Lin, FC. Garcia, GE. Supple, JM. Cooper, R. Bala, R. Deo, ES. Zado, FE. Marchlinski,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Following myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular function is determined by cardiac remodeling occurring in both infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium (NIM). Unipolar voltage mapping may detect remodeling changes in NIM that are associated with the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to identify (1) unipolar voltage characteristics in patients with chronic MI, and (2) association of voltage abnormalities with degree of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two groups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who underwent LV endocardial mapping during catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) between January 2010 and December 2012 were studied. The first group (19 males) had mild to moderate LVD (M-LVD, LVEF >35%) and was matched for age, sex, infarction size, and infarction location with 10 males who had severe LVD (S-LVD, LVEF <35%). Both bipolar and unipolar endocardial abnormal voltage areas were measured and compared between groups. Abnormal bipolar area was comparable in both groups (30 ± 8% in the S-LVD group vs 28 ± 8% in the M-LVD group; P = 0.5). Total abnormal unipolar voltage area was significantly larger in the S-LVD group (57 ± 14% vs 43 ± 13%; P = 0.02). The abnormal unipolar voltage area within the normal bipolar voltage area was greater in the S-LVD group (26 ± 11% vs 15 ± 16%; P = 0.03). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an 18.0% cut-off value for abnormal unipolar area within NIM identified severe LVD, with 90% sensitivity and 79% specificity (area under the curve 0.821). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICM and severe LVD have larger areas of unipolar voltage abnormality in the noninfarcted tissue than patients with M-LVD.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a mapování potenciálů tělesného povrchu $x metody $7 D018780
650    _2
$a kardiomyopatie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D009202
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ischemická choroba srdeční $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D017202
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a dysfunkce levé srdeční komory $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D018487
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Frankel, David S
700    1_
$a Hutchinson, Mathew D
700    1_
$a Callans, David J
700    1_
$a Epstein, Andrew E. $7 xx0246303
700    1_
$a Dixit, Sanjay
700    1_
$a Riley, Michael P
700    1_
$a Lin, David
700    1_
$a Garcia, Fermin C
700    1_
$a Supple, Gregory E
700    1_
$a Cooper, Joshua M
700    1_
$a Bala, Rupa
700    1_
$a Deo, Rajat
700    1_
$a Zado, Erica S
700    1_
$a Marchlinski, Francis E
773    0_
$w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 25, č. 3 (2014), s. 293-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24237590 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200401144805 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1072158 $s 897455
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 25 $c 3 $d 293-8 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...