-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Biostatistics methods used in celiac disease population studies
Mihaela Iancu, Mariana Tilinca, Andrei Achimas Cadariu
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- biostatistika metody MeSH
- celiakie * diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- epidemiologické studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Introduction. Research on celiac disease is based on a descriptive and inferential variety of techniques that allow summarizing data and extrapolating the target population. The aim of this study was to identify descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in International Journal of Celiac Disease. Material and method. The sample of this study was defined based on all original articles published in the journal mentioned above in 2013-2014 period. We evaluated the descriptive statistics, the number and type of inferential statistical methods used. Results. Of the eight articles analyzed, one study was a randomzat clinical trial, the remaining studies were cross-sectional studies. The articles have used both quantitative and qualitative data. The indicator of central tendency on data was mean (n = 5, 62.5 %) or the median with interquartile range (n = 1, 12.5 %) and the dispersion of data was estimatedonly by the standard deviation in 5 studies (62.5 %). Quantitative data were used in raw form, except for one study using Z scores. Qualitative data were summarized using absolute and relative frequencies (n = 7, 87.5 %). The statistical software was mentioned in all studies. All articles except one used the inferential statistical methods or statistical tests. Most articles (87.5 %) used common tests as Student’s t- test (37.5), analysis of variance/covariance (25 %), Kruskal -Wallis test (12.5 %), χ2 test (50 %), and Fisher’s exact test (12.5 %). A specified significance level was noted in 62.5 % of the articles and the significance level was estimated in 6 studies (75 %). Conclusion. Results showed that a proper understanding of standard statistical methods leads to a proper interpretation of clinical research hypothesis. If necessary, the advanced statistical analysis should be performed by a multidisciplinary collaboration with specialists in biostatistics or epidemiology.
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology University of Medicine and Pharmacy Targu Mures Romania
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15025316
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151110111245.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150724s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.12691/ijcd-2-4-10 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Iancu, Mihaela $u Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 245 10
- $a Biostatistics methods used in celiac disease population studies / $c Mihaela Iancu, Mariana Tilinca, Andrei Achimas Cadariu
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction. Research on celiac disease is based on a descriptive and inferential variety of techniques that allow summarizing data and extrapolating the target population. The aim of this study was to identify descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in International Journal of Celiac Disease. Material and method. The sample of this study was defined based on all original articles published in the journal mentioned above in 2013-2014 period. We evaluated the descriptive statistics, the number and type of inferential statistical methods used. Results. Of the eight articles analyzed, one study was a randomzat clinical trial, the remaining studies were cross-sectional studies. The articles have used both quantitative and qualitative data. The indicator of central tendency on data was mean (n = 5, 62.5 %) or the median with interquartile range (n = 1, 12.5 %) and the dispersion of data was estimatedonly by the standard deviation in 5 studies (62.5 %). Quantitative data were used in raw form, except for one study using Z scores. Qualitative data were summarized using absolute and relative frequencies (n = 7, 87.5 %). The statistical software was mentioned in all studies. All articles except one used the inferential statistical methods or statistical tests. Most articles (87.5 %) used common tests as Student’s t- test (37.5), analysis of variance/covariance (25 %), Kruskal -Wallis test (12.5 %), χ2 test (50 %), and Fisher’s exact test (12.5 %). A specified significance level was noted in 62.5 % of the articles and the significance level was estimated in 6 studies (75 %). Conclusion. Results showed that a proper understanding of standard statistical methods leads to a proper interpretation of clinical research hypothesis. If necessary, the advanced statistical analysis should be performed by a multidisciplinary collaboration with specialists in biostatistics or epidemiology.
- 650 12
- $a celiakie $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D002446
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a epidemiologické studie $7 D016021
- 650 _2
- $a biostatistika $x metody $7 D056808
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tilinca, Mariana $u Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Targu Mures, Romania
- 700 1_
- $a Cadariu, Andrei Achimas $u Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 773 0_
- $t International journal of celiac disease $x 2334-3427 $g Roč. 2, č. 4 (2014), s. 134-136 $w MED00186448
- 856 41
- $u http://www.sciepub.com/journal/index.aspx?id=ijcd $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2748 $c 280 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150723102837 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151110111258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1085524 $s 908322
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 2 $c 4 $d 134-136 $i 2334-3427 $m International journal of celiac disease $x MED00186448
- LZP __
- $c NLK125 $d 20151110 $a NLK 2015-19/mk