Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Selhání primární léčby dislokované suprakondylické zlomeniny humeru u dětí
[Failure of the primary treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children]

K. Urbášek, L. Plánka

. 2014 ; 81 (1) : 57-62.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu anglický abstrakt, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15030938

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, including potential complications, in children treated at the Department of Paediatric General Surgery, Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine in Brno between 2000 and 2011. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 564 children, 321 (57%) boys and 243 (43%) girls, who were allocated to two groups according to the method of primary treatment. The average age at the time of injury was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 16). In group 1, all 499 patients were indicated for primary closed reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis with crossed K-wires under general anaesthesia. In group 2, all 65 patients underwent closed reduction under general anaesthesia and immobilisation in a high plaster cast. The per cent failure of primary treatment requiring either repeat surgery or a change in treatment strategy was evaluated. The duration of follow-up ranged from 14 to 150 months. RESULTS: Open fractures were recorded in eight (1.4%) patients. Twenty-five (4.4%) children had further injury to the ipsilateral limb. Three (0.5%) patients underwent open reduction because it was not possible to achieve adequate reduction by the closed method. In group 1, percutaneous osteosynthesis was performed using two crossed K-wires in 484, three K-wires in 13 and four K-wires in two patients. Re-displacement of fracture fragments requiring repeat reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis occurred in 10 (2%) patients. One patient had two re-operations. In group 2, the primary treatment failed in 13 (20%) children who needed repeat reduction and conversion to percutaneous osteosynthesis. The difference in the occurrence of failure between the two groups was significant (p<0.001). Nerve injury was recorded in 92 patients (16.3% of all children and 18% of those treated with percutaneous osteosynthesis). Neurosurgical intervention was necessary for injury to the ulnar nerve in five patients and to the radial nerve in one patient. Three children had vascular injury requiring vascular surgery. Two patients underwent corrective osteotomy of the distal humerus for cubitus varus deformity. Volkmann's contracture as a complication was not recorded. DISCUSSION: Minimally displaced fractures can be treated by closed reduction and plaster cast immobilisation but this method fails in up to 20% of cases. A poor result is related to the extent of dorsal displacement before reduction; on the other hand, degrees of flexion in a plaster cast have no effect. The most frequent technical errors resulting in re-displacement after primary osteosynthesis include incomplete reduction and primary fixation in displacement, or failure of both K-wires to pass through the opposite cortex or to fix both fragments firmly. A K-wire diameter smaller than 1.6 mm may also be a reason for failure. The main problem of the method of two crossed K-wires is a frequent injury to the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Supracondylar humerus fracture is, regardless of advancements in therapy, an injury with an uncertain treatment outcome and a high percentage of complications. Since primary osteosynthesis failed in 20% of the patients treated by simple reduction under general anaesthesia and plaster cast immobilisation, for the patients requiring fracture reduction under general anaesthesia, the authors recommend one-stage primary treatment including K-wire transfixation. Re-displacement after primary osteosynthesis was always due to a technical error during the surgical procedure and can, therefore, be avoided by a precise operative technique.

Failure of the primary treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15030938
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151016071348.0
007      
ta
008      
151001s2014 xr ad f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2014/006 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24755058
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Urbášek, Karel $7 xx0245185 $u Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie, FN Brno
245    10
$a Selhání primární léčby dislokované suprakondylické zlomeniny humeru u dětí / $c K. Urbášek, L. Plánka
246    31
$a Failure of the primary treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, including potential complications, in children treated at the Department of Paediatric General Surgery, Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine in Brno between 2000 and 2011. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 564 children, 321 (57%) boys and 243 (43%) girls, who were allocated to two groups according to the method of primary treatment. The average age at the time of injury was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 16). In group 1, all 499 patients were indicated for primary closed reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis with crossed K-wires under general anaesthesia. In group 2, all 65 patients underwent closed reduction under general anaesthesia and immobilisation in a high plaster cast. The per cent failure of primary treatment requiring either repeat surgery or a change in treatment strategy was evaluated. The duration of follow-up ranged from 14 to 150 months. RESULTS: Open fractures were recorded in eight (1.4%) patients. Twenty-five (4.4%) children had further injury to the ipsilateral limb. Three (0.5%) patients underwent open reduction because it was not possible to achieve adequate reduction by the closed method. In group 1, percutaneous osteosynthesis was performed using two crossed K-wires in 484, three K-wires in 13 and four K-wires in two patients. Re-displacement of fracture fragments requiring repeat reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis occurred in 10 (2%) patients. One patient had two re-operations. In group 2, the primary treatment failed in 13 (20%) children who needed repeat reduction and conversion to percutaneous osteosynthesis. The difference in the occurrence of failure between the two groups was significant (p<0.001). Nerve injury was recorded in 92 patients (16.3% of all children and 18% of those treated with percutaneous osteosynthesis). Neurosurgical intervention was necessary for injury to the ulnar nerve in five patients and to the radial nerve in one patient. Three children had vascular injury requiring vascular surgery. Two patients underwent corrective osteotomy of the distal humerus for cubitus varus deformity. Volkmann's contracture as a complication was not recorded. DISCUSSION: Minimally displaced fractures can be treated by closed reduction and plaster cast immobilisation but this method fails in up to 20% of cases. A poor result is related to the extent of dorsal displacement before reduction; on the other hand, degrees of flexion in a plaster cast have no effect. The most frequent technical errors resulting in re-displacement after primary osteosynthesis include incomplete reduction and primary fixation in displacement, or failure of both K-wires to pass through the opposite cortex or to fix both fragments firmly. A K-wire diameter smaller than 1.6 mm may also be a reason for failure. The main problem of the method of two crossed K-wires is a frequent injury to the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Supracondylar humerus fracture is, regardless of advancements in therapy, an injury with an uncertain treatment outcome and a high percentage of complications. Since primary osteosynthesis failed in 20% of the patients treated by simple reduction under general anaesthesia and plaster cast immobilisation, for the patients requiring fracture reduction under general anaesthesia, the authors recommend one-stage primary treatment including K-wire transfixation. Re-displacement after primary osteosynthesis was always due to a technical error during the surgical procedure and can, therefore, be avoided by a precise operative technique.
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    12
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D005593
650    12
$a špatně zhojené fraktury $x patofyziologie $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D017759
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a fraktury humeru $x patofyziologie $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D006810
650    _2
$a interní fixátory $7 D016268
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a neurochirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D019635
650    _2
$a osteotomie $x metody $7 D010027
650    12
$a poranění periferního nervu $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D059348
650    12
$a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a nervus radialis $x zranění $7 D011826
650    _2
$a reoperace $x metody $7 D012086
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a výkony cévní chirurgie $x metody $7 D014656
650    12
$a poranění cév $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D057772
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Plánka, Ladislav, $d 1977- $7 xx0081919 $u Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie, FN Brno
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 81, č. 1 (2014), s. 57-62
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20151001 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151015090304 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1094191 $s 914054
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 81 $c 1 $d 57-62 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20151001

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...