-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of mupirocin-based media for selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic supplements
V. Bunesova, S. Musilova, M. Geigerova, R. Pechar, V. Rada,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky metabolismus MeSH
- bakteriální nálož metody MeSH
- Bifidobacterium účinky léků růst a vývoj MeSH
- kultivační média chemie MeSH
- mupirocin metabolismus MeSH
- počet mikrobiálních kolonií metody MeSH
- probiotika analýza MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
An international standard already exists for the selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in milk products. This standard uses Transgalactosylated oligosaccharides (TOS) propionate agar supplemented with mupirocin. However, no such standard method has been described for the selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic supplements, where the presence of bifidobacteria is much more variable than in milk products. Therefore, we enumerated bifidobacteria by colony count technique in 13 probiotic supplements using three media supplemented with mupirocin (Mup; 100mg/l): TOS, Bifidobacteria selective medium (BSM) and modified Wilkins-Chalgren anaerobe agar with soya peptone (WSP). Moreover, the potential growth of bifidobacterial strains often used in probiotic products was performed in these media. All 13 products contained members of the genus Bifidobacterium, and tested mupirocin media were found to be fully selective for bifidobacteria. However, the type strain Bifidobacterium bifidum DSM 20456 and collection strain B. bifidum DSM 20239 showed statistically significant lower counts on TOS Mup media, compared to BSM Mup and WSP Mup media. Therefore, the TOS Mup medium recommended by the ISO standard cannot be regarded as a fully selective and suitable medium for the genus Bifidobacterium. In contrast, the BSM Mup and WSP Mup media supported the growth of all bifidobacterial species.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031546
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151013123108.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2015 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.12.016 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25542994
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Bunesova, Vera $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 16521, Czech Republic. Electronic address: bunesova@af.czu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of mupirocin-based media for selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic supplements / $c V. Bunesova, S. Musilova, M. Geigerova, R. Pechar, V. Rada,
- 520 9_
- $a An international standard already exists for the selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in milk products. This standard uses Transgalactosylated oligosaccharides (TOS) propionate agar supplemented with mupirocin. However, no such standard method has been described for the selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic supplements, where the presence of bifidobacteria is much more variable than in milk products. Therefore, we enumerated bifidobacteria by colony count technique in 13 probiotic supplements using three media supplemented with mupirocin (Mup; 100mg/l): TOS, Bifidobacteria selective medium (BSM) and modified Wilkins-Chalgren anaerobe agar with soya peptone (WSP). Moreover, the potential growth of bifidobacterial strains often used in probiotic products was performed in these media. All 13 products contained members of the genus Bifidobacterium, and tested mupirocin media were found to be fully selective for bifidobacteria. However, the type strain Bifidobacterium bifidum DSM 20456 and collection strain B. bifidum DSM 20239 showed statistically significant lower counts on TOS Mup media, compared to BSM Mup and WSP Mup media. Therefore, the TOS Mup medium recommended by the ISO standard cannot be regarded as a fully selective and suitable medium for the genus Bifidobacterium. In contrast, the BSM Mup and WSP Mup media supported the growth of all bifidobacterial species.
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x metabolismus $7 D000900
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální nálož $x metody $7 D058491
- 650 _2
- $a Bifidobacterium $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D001644
- 650 _2
- $a počet mikrobiálních kolonií $x metody $7 D015169
- 650 _2
- $a kultivační média $x chemie $7 D003470
- 650 _2
- $a mupirocin $x metabolismus $7 D016712
- 650 _2
- $a probiotika $x analýza $7 D019936
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Musilova, Sarka $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 16521, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Geigerova, Martina $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 16521, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pechar, Radko $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 16521, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rada, Vojtech $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6-Suchdol, 16521, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002803 $t Journal of microbiological methods $x 1872-8359 $g Roč. 109, č. - (2015), s. 106-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25542994 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151013123258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092422 $s 914672
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 109 $c - $d 106-9 $e 20141224 $i 1872-8359 $m Journal of microbiological methods $n J Microbiol Methods $x MED00002803
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005