-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Modulation of induced cytotoxicity of doxorubicin by using apoferritin and liposomal cages
J. Gumulec, M. Fojtu, M. Raudenska, M. Sztalmachova, A. Skotakova, J. Vlachova, S. Skalickova, L. Nejdl, P. Kopel, L. Knopfova, V. Adam, R. Kizek, M. Stiborova, P. Babula, M. Masarik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2000
Free Medical Journals
od 2000
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 2000
PubMed Central
od 2007
Europe PubMed Central
od 2007
ProQuest Central
od 2000-03-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2000-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2007-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-03-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2000
PubMed
25514405
DOI
10.3390/ijms151222960
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antibiotika antitumorózní aplikace a dávkování chemie toxicita MeSH
- apoferritiny * MeSH
- doxorubicin aplikace a dávkování chemie toxicita MeSH
- inhibiční koncentrace 50 MeSH
- koně MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- liposomy * MeSH
- nádorové buněčné linie MeSH
- nosiče léků MeSH
- příprava léků MeSH
- viabilita buněk účinky léků MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Doxorubicin is an effective chemotherapeutic drug, however, its toxicity is a significant limitation in therapy. Encapsulation of doxorubicin inside liposomes or ferritin cages decreases cardiotoxicity while maintaining anticancer potency. We synthesized novel apoferritin- and liposome-encapsulated forms of doxorubicin ("Apodox" and "lip-8-dox") and compared its toxicity with doxorubicin and Myocet on prostate cell lines. Three different prostatic cell lines PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP were chosen. The toxicity of the modified doxorubicin forms was compared to conventional doxorubicin using the MTT assay, real-time cell impedance-based cell growth method (RTCA), and flow cytometry. The efficiency of doxorubicin entrapment was 56% in apoferritin cages and 42% in the liposome carrier. The accuracy of the RTCA system was verified by flow-cytometric analysis of cell viability. The doxorubicin half maximal inhibition concentrations (IC50) were determined as 170.5, 234.0, and 169.0 nM for PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP, respectively by RTCA. Lip8-dox is less toxic on the non-tumor cell line PNT1A compared to doxorubicin, while still maintaining the toxicity to tumorous cell lines similar to doxorubicin or epirubicin (IC50 = 2076.7 nM for PNT1A vs. 935.3 and 729.0 nM for 22Rv1 and LNCaP). Apodox IC50 was determined as follows: 603.1, 1344.2, and 931.2 nM for PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031583
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161214103437.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijms151222960 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25514405
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Gumulec, Jaromir $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. j.gumulec@gmail.com.
- 245 10
- $a Modulation of induced cytotoxicity of doxorubicin by using apoferritin and liposomal cages / $c J. Gumulec, M. Fojtu, M. Raudenska, M. Sztalmachova, A. Skotakova, J. Vlachova, S. Skalickova, L. Nejdl, P. Kopel, L. Knopfova, V. Adam, R. Kizek, M. Stiborova, P. Babula, M. Masarik,
- 520 9_
- $a Doxorubicin is an effective chemotherapeutic drug, however, its toxicity is a significant limitation in therapy. Encapsulation of doxorubicin inside liposomes or ferritin cages decreases cardiotoxicity while maintaining anticancer potency. We synthesized novel apoferritin- and liposome-encapsulated forms of doxorubicin ("Apodox" and "lip-8-dox") and compared its toxicity with doxorubicin and Myocet on prostate cell lines. Three different prostatic cell lines PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP were chosen. The toxicity of the modified doxorubicin forms was compared to conventional doxorubicin using the MTT assay, real-time cell impedance-based cell growth method (RTCA), and flow cytometry. The efficiency of doxorubicin entrapment was 56% in apoferritin cages and 42% in the liposome carrier. The accuracy of the RTCA system was verified by flow-cytometric analysis of cell viability. The doxorubicin half maximal inhibition concentrations (IC50) were determined as 170.5, 234.0, and 169.0 nM for PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP, respectively by RTCA. Lip8-dox is less toxic on the non-tumor cell line PNT1A compared to doxorubicin, while still maintaining the toxicity to tumorous cell lines similar to doxorubicin or epirubicin (IC50 = 2076.7 nM for PNT1A vs. 935.3 and 729.0 nM for 22Rv1 and LNCaP). Apodox IC50 was determined as follows: 603.1, 1344.2, and 931.2 nM for PNT1A, 22Rv1, and LNCaP.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antibiotika antitumorózní $x aplikace a dávkování $x chemie $x toxicita $7 D000903
- 650 12
- $a apoferritiny $7 D001052
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
- 650 _2
- $a viabilita buněk $x účinky léků $7 D002470
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a doxorubicin $x aplikace a dávkování $x chemie $x toxicita $7 D004317
- 650 _2
- $a nosiče léků $7 D004337
- 650 _2
- $a příprava léků $7 D004339
- 650 _2
- $a koně $7 D006736
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a inhibiční koncentrace 50 $7 D020128
- 650 12
- $a liposomy $7 D008081
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Fojtu, Michaela $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. michaelafojtu@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Raudenska, Martina $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. 42700@mail.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Sztalmachova, Marketa $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. sztalm@med.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Skotakova, Anna $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. 424299@mail.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Vlachova, Jana $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. vlachova.jana@centrum.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Skalickova, Sylvie $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. sylvie.skalickova@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Nejdl, Lukas $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. lukasnejdl@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Kopel, Pavel $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. paulko@centrum.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Knopfová, Lucia $u Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. l.knopfova@seznam.cz. $7 xx0208986
- 700 1_
- $a Adam, Vojtěch $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. vojtech.adam@mendelu.cz. $7 xx0064599
- 700 1_
- $a Kizek, Rene $u Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-61600 Brno, Czech Republic. kizek@sci.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Stiborova, Marie $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, CZ-12840 Prague 2, Czech Republic. stiborov@natur.cuni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Babula, Petr $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. babula@med.muni.cz.
- 700 1_
- $a Masarik, Michal $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic. masarik@med.muni.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176142 $t International journal of molecular sciences $x 1422-0067 $g Roč. 15, č. 12 (2014), s. 22960-77
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25514405 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161214103455 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092459 $s 914709
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 15 $c 12 $d 22960-77 $e 20141211 $i 1422-0067 $m International journal of molecular sciences $n Int J Mol Sci $x MED00176142
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005