Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; P = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib v chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 v 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 v 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.

• MeSH
• Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Progression-Free Survival MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin analogs & derivatives   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Phthalazines * therapeutic use   adverse effects   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Gemcitabine MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * drug therapy   MeSH
• Ovarian Neoplasms * drug therapy   genetics   mortality   pathology   MeSH
• Paclitaxel administration & dosage   MeSH
• Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Piperazines * therapeutic use   adverse effects   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Polyethylene Glycols administration & dosage   MeSH
• BRCA1 Protein genetics   MeSH
• BRCA2 Protein genetics   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Topotecan administration & dosage   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

• MeSH
• ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters MeSH
• Cytostatic Agents administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Genes, MDR MeSH
• HIV Protease Inhibitors pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Protease Inhibitors pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Lopinavir administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Drug Resistance, Multiple * drug effects   MeSH
• Neoplasms drug therapy   MeSH
• Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System MeSH
• ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1 metabolism   drug effects   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• STAT3 Transcription Factor metabolism   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH

Rituximab (RTX) plus chemotherapy (R-CHOP) applied as a first-line therapy for lymphoma leads to a relapse in approximately 40% of the patients. Therefore, novel approaches to treat aggressive lymphomas are being intensively investigated. Several RTX-resistant (RR) cell lines have been established as surrogate models to study resistance to R-CHOP. Our study reveals that RR cells are characterized by a major downregulation of CD37, a molecule currently explored as a target for immunotherapy. Using CD20 knockout (KO) cell lines, we demonstrate that CD20 and CD37 form a complex, and hypothesize that the presence of CD20 stabilizes CD37 in the cell membrane. Consequently, we observe a diminished cytotoxicity of anti-CD37 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in complement-dependent cytotoxicity in both RR and CD20 KO cells that can be partially restored upon lysosome inhibition. On the other hand, the internalization rate of anti-CD37 mAb in CD20 KO cells is increased when compared to controls, suggesting unhampered efficacy of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs). Importantly, even a major downregulation in CD37 levels does not hamper the efficacy of CD37-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. In summary, we present here a novel mechanism of CD37 regulation with further implications for the use of anti-CD37 immunotherapies.

• MeSH
• Antigens, CD20 * immunology   metabolism   genetics   MeSH
• Antigens, Neoplasm immunology   genetics   MeSH
• Lymphoma, B-Cell * immunology   therapy   genetics   drug therapy   MeSH
• Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects   MeSH
• Receptors, Chimeric Antigen immunology   genetics   metabolism   MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Doxorubicin pharmacology   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Immunotherapy * methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Cell Line, Tumor MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic MeSH
• Rituximab * pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Tetraspanins * genetics   metabolism   MeSH
• Vincristine pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT. METHODS: The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258. FINDINGS: Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238). INTERPRETATION: Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined. FUNDING: Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

• MeSH
• Adenine * analogs & derivatives   administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Transplantation, Autologous * MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Dexamethasone administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell * therapy   drug therapy   MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Piperidines * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Prednisone administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Rituximab * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods   MeSH
• Vincristine * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH
• Israel MeSH

A growing body of evidence supports the notion that cancer resistance is driven by a small subset of cancer stem cells (CSC), responsible for tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. Both CSC and chemoresistant cancer cells may share common qualities to activate a series of self-defense mechanisms against chemotherapeutic drugs. Here, we aimed to identify proteins in chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and corresponding CSC-like spheroid cells that may contribute to their resistance. We have identified several candidate proteins representing the subfamilies of DNA damage response (DDR) system, the ATP-binding cassette, and the 26S proteasome degradation machinery. We have also demonstrated that both cell types exhibit enhanced DDR when compared to corresponding parental counterparts, and identified RAD50 as one of the major contributors in the resistance phenotype. Finally, we have provided evidence that depleting or blocking RAD50 within the Mre11-Rad50-NBS1 (MRN) complex resensitizes CSC and chemoresistant TNBC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.

• MeSH
• Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects   genetics   MeSH
• Cisplatin administration & dosage   MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage   MeSH
• DNA-Binding Proteins genetics   MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   MeSH
• DNA Repair Enzymes genetics   MeSH
• MRE11 Homologue Protein genetics   MeSH
• Acid Anhydride Hydrolases genetics   MeSH
• Nuclear Proteins genetics   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplastic Stem Cells drug effects   metabolism   MeSH
• DNA Damage drug effects   MeSH
• Disease-Free Survival MeSH
• Cell Cycle Proteins genetics   MeSH
• Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms drug therapy   genetics   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

Karcinom prsu představuje heterogenní onemocnění. I přes rozšíření nových terapeutických možností pro jednotlivé podtypy karcinomu chemoterapie stále zaujímá důležité místo v adjuvantní léčbě i v léčbě metastatického onemocnění. Cílem léčby metastatického onemocnění je prodloužení života a udržení jeho kvality. Pořadí léčebných modalit a přípravků se stanovuje pro každou pacientku individuálně. Antracykliny mají významné postavení z hlediska účinnosti léčby. V managementu metastatického onemocnění je problémem jejich kumulativní dávka, při jejímž překročení se výrazně zvyšuje kardiotoxicita. Snížení dávky při současném zachování účinnosti lze dosáhnout využitím lipozomálních forem léků.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Despite the expansion of new therapeutic options for individual subtypes, chemotherapy still plays an important role in adjuvant treatment as well as in the treatment of metastatic disease. The goal of treating metastatic disease is to prolong life and maintain its quality. The order of treatment modalities and preparations is individual for each patient. Anthracyclines have an important place for their efficiency. A problem in the management of metastatic disease is their cumulative dose, above which cardiotoxicity increases significantly. Its reduction and at the same time maintaining efficiency can be achieved by using liposomal forms.

• Keywords
• lipozomální doxorubicin,
• MeSH
• Doxorubicin * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   toxicity   MeSH
• Carcinoma drug therapy   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Liposomes therapeutic use   MeSH
• Neoplasm Metastasis drug therapy   MeSH
• Breast Neoplasms drug therapy   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Case Reports MeSH

BACKGROUND: The German Hodgkin Study Group's HD18 trial established the safety and efficacy of PET-guided eBEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in escalated doses) for the treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. However, because of a protocol amendment during the enrolment period (June 1, 2011) that changed standard treatment from eight to six cycles, the results of the HD18 trial have been partially immature. We report a prespecified 5-year follow-up analysis of the completed HD18 trial. METHODS: HD18 was an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 301 hospitals and private practices in five European countries. Patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were recruited. After receiving an initial two cycles of eBEACOPP (1250 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide [day 1], 35 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin [day 1], 200 mg/m2 intravenous etoposide [day 1-3], 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine [day 1-7], 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone [day 1-14], 1·4 mg/m2 intravenous vincristine [day 8], and 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin [day 8]), patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan (PET-2). Patients with positive PET-2 were randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP; ie, eight cycles in total) or experimental therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP plus 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab; ie, eight cycles in total) until June 1, 2011. After June 1, 2011, all patients with positive PET-2 were assigned to the updated standard therapy with an additional four cycles of eBEACOPP (ie, six cycles in total). Patients with negative PET-2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard therapy (an additional six cycles of eBEACOPP [ie, eight cycles in total] until June 1, 2011; an additional four cycles of eBEACOPP [ie, six cycles in total] after June 1, 2011) or experimental therapy (an additional two cycles of eBEACOPP; ie, four cycles in total). Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method, including a random component, stratified by centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, and sex. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. HD18 aimed to improve 5-year progression-free survival by 15% in the PET-2-positive intention-to-treat cohort and to exclude inferiority of 6% or more in 5-year progression-free survival in the PET-2-negative per-protocol population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00515554, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 14, 2008, and July 18, 2014, 2101 patients were enrolled and 1945 were assigned to a treatment group according to their PET-2 result. In the PET-2-positive cohort, with a median follow-up of 73 months (IQR 59 to 94), 5-year progression-free survival was 89·9% (95% CI 85·7 to 94·1) in 217 patients assigned to eight cycles of eBEACOPP before the protocol amendment and 87·7% (83·1 to 92·4) in 217 patients assigned to eight cycles of rituximab plus eBEACOPP (p=0·40). Among 506 patients who received six cycles of eBEACOPP after the protocol amendment, 5-year progression-free survival was 90·1% (95% CI 87·2 to 92·9), with a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR 39 to 66). In the PET-2-negative cohort, with a median follow-up of 66 months (IQR 54 to 85) in the combined pre-amendment and post-amendment groups, 5-year progression-free survival was 91·2% (95% CI 88·4 to 93·9) in 446 patients who received eight or six cycles of eBEACOPP and 93·0% (90·6 to 95·4) in 474 patients who received four cycles of eBEACOPP (difference 1·9% [95% CI -1·8 to 5·5]). In the subgroup of PET-2-negative patients randomly assigned after protocol amendment, 5-year progression-free survival was 90·9% (95% CI 86·8 to 95·1) in 202 patients assigned to receive six cycles of eBEACOPP and 91·0% (86·6 to 95·5) in 200 patients assigned to receive four cycles of eBEACOPP (difference 0·1% [-5·9 to 6·2]). INTERPRETATION: Long-term follow-up confirms the efficacy and safety of PET-2-guided eBEACOPP in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The reduction from eight to four cycles of eBEACOPP represents a benchmark in the treatment of early-responding patients, who can now be potentially cured with a short and safe treatment approach. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI (Switzerland), and Roche Pharma. TRANSLATION: For the German translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

• MeSH
• Bleomycin administration & dosage   MeSH
• Progression-Free Survival MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   MeSH
• Etoposide administration & dosage   MeSH
• Hodgkin Disease drug therapy   mortality   pathology   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Positron-Emission Tomography MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use   MeSH
• Rituximab administration & dosage   MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

BACKGROUND: To improve the long-term tumour control in early, unfavourable Hodgkin Lymphoma, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD14 trial compared four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with an intensified chemotherapy regimen consisting of two cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (escalated BEACOPP) plus two cycles of ABVD. The final analysis of the trial showed a significant advantage in terms of freedom from treatment failure (difference 7·2% [95% CI 3·8-10·5] at 5 years) for patients who received two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD. However, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. To evaluate long-term efficacy and toxicity of this strategy, we did a follow-up analysis. METHODS: Patients aged 18-60 years with performance status of 2 or less and primary diagnosis of early, unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (all histologies) were included in an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of ABVD (ABVD group) or two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD (2 + 2 group), both groups also received 30 Gy involved field radiotherapy. The ABVD dosing regimen was doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), bleomycin 10 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), vinblastine 6 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15), repeated on day 29. The escalated BEACOPP dosing regimen was cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 (day 1), doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 (day 1), etoposide 200 mg/m2 (days 1-3), procarbazine 100 mg/m2 (days 1-7), prednisone 40 mg/m2 (days 1-14), vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 (day 8; maximum 2 mg), and bleomycin 10 mg/m2 (day 8), repeated on day 22. After closure of the ABVD group according to prespecified rules, patients were assigned to receive two cycles of escalated BEACOPP and two cycles of ABVD (non-randomised 2 + 2 group), which continued until the end of the predefined 5-year recruitment period. In this prespecified long-term follow-up analysis, we aimed to evaluate the secondary endpoints progression-free survival, overall survival, and long-term toxicity. To this end, we did a descriptive intention-to-treat analysis of all qualified HD14 patients and on the predefined subsets of randomised qualified HD14 patients and patients in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. The trial was registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial database, 04761296. FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2003, and Dec 29, 2009, 1686 patients were randomly assigned to the ABVD group (847 [50·2%] patients) and the 2 + 2 group (839 [49·8%] patients). 370 additional patients were recruited to the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. 1550 (92%) randomly assigned patients (median observation time 112 months [IQR 80-132]) and 339 (92%) patients in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group (median observation time 74 months [58-100]) were included in the qualified analysis set. 10-year overall survival in the randomly assigned patients was 94·1% (95% CI 92·0-95·7) for the ABVD group and 94·1% (91·8-95·7) for the 2 + 2 group (HR 1·0 [95% CI 0·6-1·5]; p=0·88). 8-year overall survival in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group was 95·1% (95% CI 91·6-97·2). 10-year progression-free survival in the randomly assigned patients was 85·6% (95% CI 82·6-88·1) for the ABVD group and 91·2% (88·4-93·3) for the 2 + 2 group (HR 0·5% [95% CI 0·4-0·7]; p=0·0001), accounting for a significant difference of 5·6% (95% CI 1·9-9·2) favouring the 2 + 2 group (p=0·0001). In the non-randomised 2 + 2 group, 8-year progression-free survival was 94·5% (95% CI 91·1-96·6). Standardised incidence ratios of second primary malignancies were similar between the ABVD group (2·3 [95% CI 1·6-3·1]) and the 2 + 2 group (2·5 [1·8-3·4]; Gray's p=0·80). Standardised incidence ratio of second primary malignancies was 3·1 (95% CI 1·7-5·0) in the non-randomised 2 + 2 group. INTERPRETATION: This long-term analysis confirms superior tumour control in the 2 + 2 group compared with the ABVD group without translating into an overall survival difference. At longer follow-up, there is no difference regarding second primary malignancies between groups. In conclusion, the 2 + 2 regimen spares a significant number of patients from the burden of relapse and additional treatment without increased long-term toxicity. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe eV and Swiss Federal Government.

• MeSH
• Bleomycin administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Dacarbazine administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Progression-Free Survival MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Etoposide administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Hodgkin Disease drug therapy   pathology   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Prednisone administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Procarbazine administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use   MeSH
• Neoplasms, Second Primary epidemiology   MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging methods   MeSH
• Vinblastine administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Vincristine administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH
• Geographicals
• Germany MeSH

PURPOSE: Patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) historically showed inferior survival with standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Phase II studies demonstrated that adding the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide to R-CHOP improved outcomes in ABC-type DLBCL. The goal of the global, phase III ROBUST study was to compare lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) with placebo/R-CHOP in previously untreated, ABC-type DLBCL. METHODS: Histology and cell-of-origin type were prospectively analyzed by central pathology prior to random assignment and study treatment. Patients with ABC-DLBCL received lenalidomide oral 15 mg/d, days 1-14/21 plus standard R-CHOP21 versus placebo/R-CHOP21 for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central radiology review. RESULTS: A total of 570 patients with ABC-DLBCL (n = 285 per arm) were stratified by International Prognostic Index score, age, and bulky disease, and randomly assigned to R2-CHOP or placebo/R-CHOP. Baseline demographics were similar between arms. Most patients completed six cycles of treatment: 74% R2-CHOP and 84% placebo/R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for R2-CHOP versus placebo/R-CHOP were neutropenia (60% v 48%), anemia (22% v 14%), thrombocytopenia (17% v 11%), and leukopenia (14% v 15%). The primary end point of PFS was not met, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.14) and P = .29; median PFS has not been reached for either arm. PFS trends favoring R2-CHOP over placebo/R-CHOP were seen in patients with higher-risk disease. CONCLUSION: ROBUST is the first DLBCL phase III study to integrate biomarker-driven identification of eligible ABC patients. Although the ROBUST trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS in all patients, the safety profile of R2-CHOP was consistent with individual treatments with no new safety signals.

• MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse drug therapy   mortality   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Lenalidomide administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Prednisone administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Rituximab administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Vincristine administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

The phase 2 CAVALLI (NCT02055820) study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in first-line (1L) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients demonstrating Bcl-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2 IHC+). Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had previously untreated DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and International Prognostic Index 2 to 5. Venetoclax 800 mg (days 4-10, cycle 1; days 1-10, cycles 2-8) was administered with rituximab (8 cycles) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (6-8 cycles) in 21-day cycles. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and research_plete response (CR) at end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses used covariate-adjusted R-CHOP controls from the GOYA/BO21005 study, an appropriate contemporary benchmark for safety and efficacy. Safety and efficacy analyses included 206 patients. CR rate at EOT was 69% in the overall population and was maintained across Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, trends were observed for improved investigator-assessed PFS for venetoclax plus R-CHOP in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.87) and Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) vs R-CHOP. Despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (86%), related mortality was not increased (2%). Chemotherapy dose intensity was similar in CAVALLI vs GOYA. The addition of venetoclax to R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL demonstrates increased, but manageable, myelosuppression and the potential of improved efficacy, particularly in high-risk Bcl-2 IHC+ patient subgroups.

• MeSH
• Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse drug therapy   genetics   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Doxorubicin administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor therapeutic use   MeSH
• Gastrointestinal Diseases chemically induced   MeSH
• Genes, bcl-2 MeSH
• Infections etiology   MeSH
• Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
• Hematologic Diseases chemically induced   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Neoplasm Proteins antagonists & inhibitors   MeSH
• Prednisone administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage   adverse effects   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 antagonists & inhibitors   MeSH
• Rituximab administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Sulfonamides administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Fatigue chemically induced   MeSH
• Vincristine administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase I MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH