Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Taming the wild: resolving the gene pools of non-model Arabidopsis lineages

N. Hohmann, R. Schmickl, TY. Chiang, M. Lučanová, F. Kolář, K. Marhold, MA. Koch,

. 2014 ; 14 (-) : 224. [pub] 20141027

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Wild relatives in the genus Arabidopsis are recognized as useful model systems to study traits and evolutionary processes in outcrossing species, which are often difficult or even impossible to investigate in the selfing and annual Arabidopsis thaliana. However, Arabidopsis as a genus is littered with sub-species and ecotypes which make realizing the potential of these non-model Arabidopsis lineages problematic. There are relatively few evolutionary studies which comprehensively characterize the gene pools across all of the Arabidopsis supra-groups and hypothesized evolutionary lineages and none include sampling at a world-wide scale. Here we explore the gene pools of these various taxa using various molecular markers and cytological analyses. RESULTS: Based on ITS, microsatellite, chloroplast and nuclear DNA content data we demonstrate the presence of three major evolutionary groups broadly characterized as A. lyrata group, A. halleri group and A. arenosa group. All are composed of further species and sub-species forming larger aggregates. Depending on the resolution of the marker, a few closely related taxa such as A. pedemontana, A. cebennensis and A. croatica are also clearly distinct evolutionary lineages. ITS sequences and a population-based screen based on microsatellites were highly concordant. The major gene pools identified by ITS sequences were also significantly differentiated by their homoploid nuclear DNA content estimated by flow cytometry. The chloroplast genome provided less resolution than the nuclear data, and it remains unclear whether the extensive haplotype sharing apparent between taxa results from gene flow or incomplete lineage sorting in this relatively young group of species with Pleistocene origins. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the genetic variation within and among the various taxa of the genus Arabidopsis. The resolved gene pools and evolutionary lineages will set the framework for future comparative studies on genetic diversity. Extensive population-based phylogeographic studies will also be required, however, in particular for A. arenosa and their affiliated taxa and cytotypes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15031770
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160816073253.0
007      
ta
008      
151005s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12862-014-0224-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25344686
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hohmann, Nora $u Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. nora.hohmann@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
245    10
$a Taming the wild: resolving the gene pools of non-model Arabidopsis lineages / $c N. Hohmann, R. Schmickl, TY. Chiang, M. Lučanová, F. Kolář, K. Marhold, MA. Koch,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Wild relatives in the genus Arabidopsis are recognized as useful model systems to study traits and evolutionary processes in outcrossing species, which are often difficult or even impossible to investigate in the selfing and annual Arabidopsis thaliana. However, Arabidopsis as a genus is littered with sub-species and ecotypes which make realizing the potential of these non-model Arabidopsis lineages problematic. There are relatively few evolutionary studies which comprehensively characterize the gene pools across all of the Arabidopsis supra-groups and hypothesized evolutionary lineages and none include sampling at a world-wide scale. Here we explore the gene pools of these various taxa using various molecular markers and cytological analyses. RESULTS: Based on ITS, microsatellite, chloroplast and nuclear DNA content data we demonstrate the presence of three major evolutionary groups broadly characterized as A. lyrata group, A. halleri group and A. arenosa group. All are composed of further species and sub-species forming larger aggregates. Depending on the resolution of the marker, a few closely related taxa such as A. pedemontana, A. cebennensis and A. croatica are also clearly distinct evolutionary lineages. ITS sequences and a population-based screen based on microsatellites were highly concordant. The major gene pools identified by ITS sequences were also significantly differentiated by their homoploid nuclear DNA content estimated by flow cytometry. The chloroplast genome provided less resolution than the nuclear data, and it remains unclear whether the extensive haplotype sharing apparent between taxa results from gene flow or incomplete lineage sorting in this relatively young group of species with Pleistocene origins. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the genetic variation within and among the various taxa of the genus Arabidopsis. The resolved gene pools and evolutionary lineages will set the framework for future comparative studies on genetic diversity. Extensive population-based phylogeographic studies will also be required, however, in particular for A. arenosa and their affiliated taxa and cytotypes.
650    _2
$a Arabidopsis $x klasifikace $x cytologie $x genetika $7 D017360
650    _2
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a chloroplasty $x genetika $7 D002736
650    _2
$a ekotyp $7 D060146
650    _2
$a tok genů $7 D051456
650    _2
$a genový pool $7 D005788
650    _2
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    _2
$a genom chloroplastový $7 D054628
650    _2
$a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
650    _2
$a fylogeografie $7 D058974
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Schmickl, Roswitha $u Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. roswitha.schmickl@cos.uni-heidelberg.de. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. roswitha.schmickl@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
700    1_
$a Chiang, Tzen-Yuh $u Department of Life Sciences, Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. tychiang@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
700    1_
$a Lučanová, Magdalena $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. kubesovm@gmail.com. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, Prague, CZ-128 01, Czech Republic. kubesovm@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Kolář, Filip, $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. filip.kolar@gmail.com. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, Prague, CZ-128 01, Czech Republic. filip.kolar@gmail.com. $d 1985- $7 jx20080211046
700    1_
$a Marhold, Karol $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, CZ-25243, Czech Republic. karol.marhold@savba.sk. Institute of Botany Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava, SK-845 23, Slovakia. karol.marhold@savba.sk.
700    1_
$a Koch, Marcus A $u Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. marcus.koch@cos.uni-heidelberg.de.
773    0_
$w MED00006797 $t BMC evolutionary biology $x 1471-2148 $g Roč. 14, č. - (2014), s. 224
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25344686 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20151005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160816073540 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1092646 $s 914896
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 14 $c - $d 224 $e 20141027 $i 1471-2148 $m BMC evolutionary biology $n BMC Evol Biol $x MED00006797
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20151005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...