-
Something wrong with this record ?
Bone SPECT image reconstruction using deconvolution and wavelet transformation: development, performance assessment and comparison in phantom and patient study with standard OSEM and resolution recovery algorithm
J. Ptáček, L. Henzlová, P. Koranda,
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Algorithms * MeSH
- Phantoms, Imaging * MeSH
- Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon instrumentation MeSH
- Bone and Bones MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Signal-To-Noise Ratio MeSH
- Wavelet Analysis * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to introduce a new algorithm for image reconstruction in bone SPECT and to compare its performances with a commercially available standard OSEM and resolution recovery (RR) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The algorithm was built applying the Lucy-Richardson deconvolution adn logarithmic image processing to the projections. A modification of the coefficients of wavelet decomposition was used to suppress the noise. The comparison with vendor software was performed both in a phantom study, using Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR), Signal-to-Background ratio (SBR), spatial resolution and in clinical studies, by visual assessment of changes in contrast, spatial resolution and lesion detectability. RESULTS: A change in the SNR (from -4 to 40%), an increase in the SBR (from 19 to 40%), a minor improvement in spatial resolution and a similar noise level were observed in the phantom study in comparison to the standard OSEM. A decrease in the SNR, a worse spatial resolution, but only a 3 to 13 % lower SBR were achieved in comparison with the vendor supplied RR algorithm. The proposed algorithm creates patient images with better contrast and lesion detectability compared to clinically used OSEM. Compared to RR, more than half of obtained images showed better contrast and nearly half of them have better lesion detectability. CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm compares favorably with the standard OSEM. Although less favorable, the comparison with RR and noise suppression algorithms, suggests that it can be used with only a slight decrease in the SBR.
Dept of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Dept of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031972
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151014105906.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.06.002 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24989849
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Ptáček, Jaroslav $u Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic; Dept. of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jaroslav.ptacek@fnol.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Bone SPECT image reconstruction using deconvolution and wavelet transformation: development, performance assessment and comparison in phantom and patient study with standard OSEM and resolution recovery algorithm / $c J. Ptáček, L. Henzlová, P. Koranda,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to introduce a new algorithm for image reconstruction in bone SPECT and to compare its performances with a commercially available standard OSEM and resolution recovery (RR) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The algorithm was built applying the Lucy-Richardson deconvolution adn logarithmic image processing to the projections. A modification of the coefficients of wavelet decomposition was used to suppress the noise. The comparison with vendor software was performed both in a phantom study, using Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR), Signal-to-Background ratio (SBR), spatial resolution and in clinical studies, by visual assessment of changes in contrast, spatial resolution and lesion detectability. RESULTS: A change in the SNR (from -4 to 40%), an increase in the SBR (from 19 to 40%), a minor improvement in spatial resolution and a similar noise level were observed in the phantom study in comparison to the standard OSEM. A decrease in the SNR, a worse spatial resolution, but only a 3 to 13 % lower SBR were achieved in comparison with the vendor supplied RR algorithm. The proposed algorithm creates patient images with better contrast and lesion detectability compared to clinically used OSEM. Compared to RR, more than half of obtained images showed better contrast and nearly half of them have better lesion detectability. CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm compares favorably with the standard OSEM. Although less favorable, the comparison with RR and noise suppression algorithms, suggests that it can be used with only a slight decrease in the SBR.
- 650 12
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a kosti a kostní tkáň $x radioizotopová diagnostika $7 D001842
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
- 650 12
- $a fantomy radiodiagnostické $7 D019047
- 650 _2
- $a poměr signál - šum $7 D059629
- 650 _2
- $a jednofotonová emisní výpočetní tomografie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D015899
- 650 12
- $a vlnková analýza $7 D058067
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Henzlová, Lenka $u Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Koranda, Pavel $u Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167391 $t Physica medica PM an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) $x 1724-191X $g Roč. 30, č. 7 (2014), s. 858-64
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24989849 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151014110056 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092848 $s 915098
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 30 $c 7 $d 858-64 $e 20140630 $i 1724-191X $m Physica medica $n Phys Med $x MED00167391
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005