Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Concave impressio ligamenti costoclavicularis ("rhomboid fossa") and its prevalence and relevance to clinical practice

K. Koudela, J. Koudelová, K. Koudela, P. Zeman,

. 2015 ; 37 (3) : 239-45. [pub] 20140724

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16000689
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-04-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: The incidence of fossa rhomboidea (RF) and its relevance to clinical practice were retrospectively studied in 1,017 cases of patients who endured clavicle fractures. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different types of insertion areas of costoclavicular ligament (LCC) in our group, as well as gender distribution. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the RF represents a weakened part of clavicle where the fracture occurred. Several of our findings in our control group were quite interesting and worth mentioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,017 roentgenograms were analyzed from 1,027 clavicle fractures of patients from 2 to 90 years of age who were treated between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Using the Allman classification system, 79% of the examined clavicle fractures were identified as type 1, 18.4% as type 2, and 2.6% as type 3. Statistical analysis did not demonstrate a difference in fractures of the clavicle between the right and the left side (47, 53%, respectively; p = 0.0570). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of fractures between the genders (males 71%, females 29 %; p < 0.0001). The results for the insertion attachment area were as follows for the given percent of cases: flat (75.2%); concave (21.1%); convex (3.7%). Those 21.1% of concave insertions represent RF. 5.3% of RF cases were between 2 to 10 mm in depth. One of the patients with RF had a deepend insertion of the LCC on the superior surface of the first rib analogous to RF. The bilateral RF was asymmetrical in its appearance. One of the patients suffered from LCC enthesopathy. The difference of the distribution of RF throughout the genders was 10.5% in females and 89.5% in males, marking a difference that is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Only in 0.3%, the fracture line occurred in RF, which did not prove the RF to be a weakened point of the fracture (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RF represents a variety of LCC insertion that is predominantly found in male patients, which can be used in the determination of gender in forensic analysis. RF is not a weak point for fracture formation. Enthesopathy of the LCC together with RF can lead to suspicion concerning the osteolytic process. Biopsy of RF should be avoided. Insertion of LCC similar to RF can be exceptionally found on the first rib.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000689
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160127114302.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2015 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00276-014-1342-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25056871
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Koudela, Karel $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic, k.koudela@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a Concave impressio ligamenti costoclavicularis ("rhomboid fossa") and its prevalence and relevance to clinical practice / $c K. Koudela, J. Koudelová, K. Koudela, P. Zeman,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The incidence of fossa rhomboidea (RF) and its relevance to clinical practice were retrospectively studied in 1,017 cases of patients who endured clavicle fractures. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different types of insertion areas of costoclavicular ligament (LCC) in our group, as well as gender distribution. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the RF represents a weakened part of clavicle where the fracture occurred. Several of our findings in our control group were quite interesting and worth mentioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,017 roentgenograms were analyzed from 1,027 clavicle fractures of patients from 2 to 90 years of age who were treated between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Using the Allman classification system, 79% of the examined clavicle fractures were identified as type 1, 18.4% as type 2, and 2.6% as type 3. Statistical analysis did not demonstrate a difference in fractures of the clavicle between the right and the left side (47, 53%, respectively; p = 0.0570). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of fractures between the genders (males 71%, females 29 %; p < 0.0001). The results for the insertion attachment area were as follows for the given percent of cases: flat (75.2%); concave (21.1%); convex (3.7%). Those 21.1% of concave insertions represent RF. 5.3% of RF cases were between 2 to 10 mm in depth. One of the patients with RF had a deepend insertion of the LCC on the superior surface of the first rib analogous to RF. The bilateral RF was asymmetrical in its appearance. One of the patients suffered from LCC enthesopathy. The difference of the distribution of RF throughout the genders was 10.5% in females and 89.5% in males, marking a difference that is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Only in 0.3%, the fracture line occurred in RF, which did not prove the RF to be a weakened point of the fracture (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RF represents a variety of LCC insertion that is predominantly found in male patients, which can be used in the determination of gender in forensic analysis. RF is not a weak point for fracture formation. Enthesopathy of the LCC together with RF can lead to suspicion concerning the osteolytic process. Biopsy of RF should be avoided. Insertion of LCC similar to RF can be exceptionally found on the first rib.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a klíční kost $x anatomie a histologie $x zranění $x radiografie $7 D002968
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fraktury kostí $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D050723
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
650    _2
$a ligamenta $x abnormality $x anatomie a histologie $x zranění $x radiografie $7 D008022
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Koudelová, Jana
700    1_
$a Koudela, Karel
700    1_
$a Zeman, Petr
773    0_
$w MED00004462 $t Surgical and radiologic anatomy SRA $x 1279-8517 $g Roč. 37, č. 3 (2015), s. 239-45
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25056871 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160127114426 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1102970 $s 924895
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 37 $c 3 $d 239-45 $e 20140724 $i 1279-8517 $m Surgical and radiologic anatomy $n Surg Radiol Anat $x MED00004462
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...