-
Something wrong with this record ?
Concave impressio ligamenti costoclavicularis ("rhomboid fossa") and its prevalence and relevance to clinical practice
K. Koudela, J. Koudelová, K. Koudela, P. Zeman,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-04-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Fractures, Bone radiography surgery MeSH
- Clavicle anatomy & histology injuries radiography MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ligaments abnormalities anatomy & histology injuries radiography MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The incidence of fossa rhomboidea (RF) and its relevance to clinical practice were retrospectively studied in 1,017 cases of patients who endured clavicle fractures. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different types of insertion areas of costoclavicular ligament (LCC) in our group, as well as gender distribution. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the RF represents a weakened part of clavicle where the fracture occurred. Several of our findings in our control group were quite interesting and worth mentioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,017 roentgenograms were analyzed from 1,027 clavicle fractures of patients from 2 to 90 years of age who were treated between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Using the Allman classification system, 79% of the examined clavicle fractures were identified as type 1, 18.4% as type 2, and 2.6% as type 3. Statistical analysis did not demonstrate a difference in fractures of the clavicle between the right and the left side (47, 53%, respectively; p = 0.0570). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of fractures between the genders (males 71%, females 29 %; p < 0.0001). The results for the insertion attachment area were as follows for the given percent of cases: flat (75.2%); concave (21.1%); convex (3.7%). Those 21.1% of concave insertions represent RF. 5.3% of RF cases were between 2 to 10 mm in depth. One of the patients with RF had a deepend insertion of the LCC on the superior surface of the first rib analogous to RF. The bilateral RF was asymmetrical in its appearance. One of the patients suffered from LCC enthesopathy. The difference of the distribution of RF throughout the genders was 10.5% in females and 89.5% in males, marking a difference that is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Only in 0.3%, the fracture line occurred in RF, which did not prove the RF to be a weakened point of the fracture (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RF represents a variety of LCC insertion that is predominantly found in male patients, which can be used in the determination of gender in forensic analysis. RF is not a weak point for fracture formation. Enthesopathy of the LCC together with RF can lead to suspicion concerning the osteolytic process. Biopsy of RF should be avoided. Insertion of LCC similar to RF can be exceptionally found on the first rib.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16000689
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160127114302.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160108s2015 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00276-014-1342-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25056871
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Koudela, Karel $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic, k.koudela@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Concave impressio ligamenti costoclavicularis ("rhomboid fossa") and its prevalence and relevance to clinical practice / $c K. Koudela, J. Koudelová, K. Koudela, P. Zeman,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The incidence of fossa rhomboidea (RF) and its relevance to clinical practice were retrospectively studied in 1,017 cases of patients who endured clavicle fractures. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of different types of insertion areas of costoclavicular ligament (LCC) in our group, as well as gender distribution. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the RF represents a weakened part of clavicle where the fracture occurred. Several of our findings in our control group were quite interesting and worth mentioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,017 roentgenograms were analyzed from 1,027 clavicle fractures of patients from 2 to 90 years of age who were treated between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Using the Allman classification system, 79% of the examined clavicle fractures were identified as type 1, 18.4% as type 2, and 2.6% as type 3. Statistical analysis did not demonstrate a difference in fractures of the clavicle between the right and the left side (47, 53%, respectively; p = 0.0570). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of fractures between the genders (males 71%, females 29 %; p < 0.0001). The results for the insertion attachment area were as follows for the given percent of cases: flat (75.2%); concave (21.1%); convex (3.7%). Those 21.1% of concave insertions represent RF. 5.3% of RF cases were between 2 to 10 mm in depth. One of the patients with RF had a deepend insertion of the LCC on the superior surface of the first rib analogous to RF. The bilateral RF was asymmetrical in its appearance. One of the patients suffered from LCC enthesopathy. The difference of the distribution of RF throughout the genders was 10.5% in females and 89.5% in males, marking a difference that is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Only in 0.3%, the fracture line occurred in RF, which did not prove the RF to be a weakened point of the fracture (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RF represents a variety of LCC insertion that is predominantly found in male patients, which can be used in the determination of gender in forensic analysis. RF is not a weak point for fracture formation. Enthesopathy of the LCC together with RF can lead to suspicion concerning the osteolytic process. Biopsy of RF should be avoided. Insertion of LCC similar to RF can be exceptionally found on the first rib.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a věkové faktory $7 D000367
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a klíční kost $x anatomie a histologie $x zranění $x radiografie $7 D002968
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury kostí $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D050723
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a ligamenta $x abnormality $x anatomie a histologie $x zranění $x radiografie $7 D008022
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Koudelová, Jana
- 700 1_
- $a Koudela, Karel
- 700 1_
- $a Zeman, Petr
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004462 $t Surgical and radiologic anatomy SRA $x 1279-8517 $g Roč. 37, č. 3 (2015), s. 239-45
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25056871 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160127114426 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1102970 $s 924895
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 37 $c 3 $d 239-45 $e 20140724 $i 1279-8517 $m Surgical and radiologic anatomy $n Surg Radiol Anat $x MED00004462
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160108