-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial
RJ. Motzer, TE. Hutson, H. Glen, MD. Michaelson, A. Molina, T. Eisen, J. Jassem, J. Zolnierek, JP. Maroto, B. Mellado, B. Melichar, J. Tomasek, A. Kremer, HJ. Kim, K. Wood, C. Dutcus, J. Larkin,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze II, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2000-09-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-09-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-09-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-09-01 do Před 2 měsíci
- MeSH
- chinoliny aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- everolimus aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- fenylmočovinové sloučeniny aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin patologie MeSH
- protinádorové látky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Currently, metastatic renal cell carcinoma is treated with sequential single agents targeting VEGF or mTOR. Here, we aimed to assess lenvatinib, everolimus, or their combination as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We did a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial at 37 centres in five countries and enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma. We included patients who had received treatment with a VEGF-targeted therapy and progressed on or within 9 months of stopping that agent. Patients were randomised via an interactive voice response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to either lenvatinib (24 mg/day), everolimus (10 mg/day), or lenvatinib plus everolimus (18 mg/day and 5 mg/day, respectively) administered orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The randomisation procedure dynamically minimised imbalances between treatment groups for the stratification factors haemoglobin and corrected serum calcium. The primary objective was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is closed to enrolment but patients' treatment and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01136733. FINDINGS: Between March 16, 2012, and June 19, 2013, 153 patients were randomly allocated to receive either the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus (n=51), single-agent lenvatinib (n=52), or single-agent everolimus (n=50). Lenvatinib plus everolimus significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (median 14·6 months [95% CI 5·9-20·1] vs 5·5 months [3·5-7·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·24-0·68; p=0·0005), but not compared with lenvatinib alone (7·4 months [95% CI 5·6-10·2]; HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·30-1·10; p=0·12). Single-agent lenvatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (HR 0·61, 95% CI 0·38-0·98; p=0·048). Grade 3 and 4 events occurred in fewer patients allocated single-agent everolimus (25 [50%]) compared with those assigned lenvatinib alone (41 [79%]) or lenvatinib plus everolimus (36 [71%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse event in patients allocated lenvatinib plus everolimus was diarrhoea (ten [20%]), in those assigned single-agent lenvatinib it was proteinuria (ten [19%]), and in those assigned single-agent everolimus it was anaemia (six [12%]). Two deaths were deemed related to study drug, one cerebral haemorrhage in the lenvatinib plus everolimus group and one myocardial infarction with single-agent lenvatinib. INTERPRETATION: Lenvatinib plus everolimus and lenvatinib alone resulted in a progression-free survival benefit for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed after one previous VEGF-targeted therapy. Further study of lenvatinib is warranted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: Eisai Inc.
Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge UK
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre Glasgow UK
Centrum Onkologii Instytut w Warszawie Warsaw Poland
Departamento de Oncología Médica Barcelona Spain
Eisai Inc Woodcliff Lake NJ USA
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston MA USA
Medical University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16009926
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160418121545.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00290-9 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00290-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26482279
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Motzer, Robert J $u Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: motzerr@mskcc.org.
- 245 10
- $a Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial / $c RJ. Motzer, TE. Hutson, H. Glen, MD. Michaelson, A. Molina, T. Eisen, J. Jassem, J. Zolnierek, JP. Maroto, B. Mellado, B. Melichar, J. Tomasek, A. Kremer, HJ. Kim, K. Wood, C. Dutcus, J. Larkin,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Currently, metastatic renal cell carcinoma is treated with sequential single agents targeting VEGF or mTOR. Here, we aimed to assess lenvatinib, everolimus, or their combination as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We did a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial at 37 centres in five countries and enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma. We included patients who had received treatment with a VEGF-targeted therapy and progressed on or within 9 months of stopping that agent. Patients were randomised via an interactive voice response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to either lenvatinib (24 mg/day), everolimus (10 mg/day), or lenvatinib plus everolimus (18 mg/day and 5 mg/day, respectively) administered orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The randomisation procedure dynamically minimised imbalances between treatment groups for the stratification factors haemoglobin and corrected serum calcium. The primary objective was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is closed to enrolment but patients' treatment and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01136733. FINDINGS: Between March 16, 2012, and June 19, 2013, 153 patients were randomly allocated to receive either the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus (n=51), single-agent lenvatinib (n=52), or single-agent everolimus (n=50). Lenvatinib plus everolimus significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (median 14·6 months [95% CI 5·9-20·1] vs 5·5 months [3·5-7·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·24-0·68; p=0·0005), but not compared with lenvatinib alone (7·4 months [95% CI 5·6-10·2]; HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·30-1·10; p=0·12). Single-agent lenvatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with everolimus alone (HR 0·61, 95% CI 0·38-0·98; p=0·048). Grade 3 and 4 events occurred in fewer patients allocated single-agent everolimus (25 [50%]) compared with those assigned lenvatinib alone (41 [79%]) or lenvatinib plus everolimus (36 [71%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse event in patients allocated lenvatinib plus everolimus was diarrhoea (ten [20%]), in those assigned single-agent lenvatinib it was proteinuria (ten [19%]), and in those assigned single-agent everolimus it was anaemia (six [12%]). Two deaths were deemed related to study drug, one cerebral haemorrhage in the lenvatinib plus everolimus group and one myocardial infarction with single-agent lenvatinib. INTERPRETATION: Lenvatinib plus everolimus and lenvatinib alone resulted in a progression-free survival benefit for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed after one previous VEGF-targeted therapy. Further study of lenvatinib is warranted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: Eisai Inc.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a protinádorové látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000970
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom z renálních buněk $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D002292
- 650 _2
- $a everolimus $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000068338
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a nádory ledvin $x patologie $7 D007680
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a fenylmočovinové sloučeniny $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010671
- 650 _2
- $a chinoliny $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D011804
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hutson, Thomas E $u Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Glen, Hilary $u Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Michaelson, M Dror $u Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Molina, Ana $u Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Eisen, Timothy $u Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Jassem, Jacek $u Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Zolnierek, Jakub $u Centrum Onkologii, Instytut w Warszawie, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Maroto, Jose Pablo $u Departamento de Oncología Médica, Barcelona, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Mellado, Begoña $u Medical Oncology Department, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Melichar, Bohuslav $u Onkologicka klinika, Lekarska fakulta Univerzity Palackeho a Fakultni nemocnice, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomasek, Jiri $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kremer, Alton $u Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Kim, Han-Joo $u Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Wood, Karen $u Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Dutcus, Corina $u Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Larkin, James $u Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011558 $t The Lancet. Oncology $x 1474-5488 $g Roč. 16, č. 15 (2015), s. 1473-82
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26482279 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160418121632 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113355 $s 934294
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 16 $c 15 $d 1473-82 $e 20151022 $i 1474-5488 $m Lancet oncology $n Lancet Oncol. $x MED00011558
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408