-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Cancer Samples with Indeterminate Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization by Quantitative Real-Time PCR
V. Koudelakova, J. Berkovcova, R. Trojanec, J. Vrbkova, L. Radova, J. Ehrmann, Z. Kolar, B. Melichar, M. Hajduch,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1999
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 1999 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Gene Amplification MeSH
- Formaldehyde chemistry MeSH
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence methods MeSH
- Immunoenzyme Techniques MeSH
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor analysis MeSH
- Tumor Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 genetics metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Paraffin Embedding methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Administration of drugs targeting HER2 (official symbol ERBB2) is an important component of therapy for breast cancer patients with HER2 amplification/overexpression as determined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In approximately 5% of breast cancers, ISH assays fail. In these cases, HER2 protein expression is evaluated by IHC alone that may yield false negatives/positives for poor-quality samples. Therefore, we developed a method that was based on quantitative real-time PCR applicable for DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Its limit of detection was determined with breast cancer cell lines and validated with 223 breast cancer patient samples. On the basis of comparisons with fluorescent ISH (FISH) and IHC data, the sensitivity of the new method was 94.2% and 95.1%, its specificity was 100% and 99.1%, and overall concordance between results obtained with the quantitative real-time PCR method and FISH/IHC was 97.6% for both methods. The quantitative real-time PCR method was then used to evaluate the HER2 status of 198 of 3696 breast cancer tissues that yielded indeterminate FISH results. The HER2 copy number was successfully determined in 69.2% of these indeterminate samples. Thus, the DNA-based technique appears to be a specific, sensitive method for determining HER2 copy numbers when the FISH assay fails, which may complement IHC tests.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16010218
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160418115849.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.007 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.03.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25956448
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Koudelakova, Vladimira $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Cancer Samples with Indeterminate Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization by Quantitative Real-Time PCR / $c V. Koudelakova, J. Berkovcova, R. Trojanec, J. Vrbkova, L. Radova, J. Ehrmann, Z. Kolar, B. Melichar, M. Hajduch,
- 520 9_
- $a Administration of drugs targeting HER2 (official symbol ERBB2) is an important component of therapy for breast cancer patients with HER2 amplification/overexpression as determined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In approximately 5% of breast cancers, ISH assays fail. In these cases, HER2 protein expression is evaluated by IHC alone that may yield false negatives/positives for poor-quality samples. Therefore, we developed a method that was based on quantitative real-time PCR applicable for DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Its limit of detection was determined with breast cancer cell lines and validated with 223 breast cancer patient samples. On the basis of comparisons with fluorescent ISH (FISH) and IHC data, the sensitivity of the new method was 94.2% and 95.1%, its specificity was 100% and 99.1%, and overall concordance between results obtained with the quantitative real-time PCR method and FISH/IHC was 97.6% for both methods. The quantitative real-time PCR method was then used to evaluate the HER2 status of 198 of 3696 breast cancer tissues that yielded indeterminate FISH results. The HER2 copy number was successfully determined in 69.2% of these indeterminate samples. Thus, the DNA-based technique appears to be a specific, sensitive method for determining HER2 copy numbers when the FISH assay fails, which may complement IHC tests.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x analýza $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a formaldehyd $x chemie $7 D005557
- 650 _2
- $a amplifikace genu $7 D005784
- 650 _2
- $a regulace genové exprese u nádorů $7 D015972
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoenzymatické techniky $7 D007124
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $x metody $7 D017404
- 650 _2
- $a zalévání tkání do parafínu $x metody $7 D016612
- 650 _2
- $a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $7 D060888
- 650 _2
- $a receptor erbB-2 $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D018719
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové buňky kultivované $7 D014407
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Berkovcova, Jitka $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Trojanec, Radek $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbkova, Jana $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Radova, Lenka $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ehrmann, Jiri $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kolar, Zdenek $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Melichar, Bohuslav $u Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hajduch, Marian $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: marian.hajduch@upol.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012712 $t The Journal of molecular diagnostics JMD $x 1943-7811 $g Roč. 17, č. 4 (2015), s. 446-55
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25956448 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160418115936 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113647 $s 934586
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 17 $c 4 $d 446-55 $e 20150505 $i 1943-7811 $m The Journal of molecular diagnostics $n J Mol Diagn $x MED00012712
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408