• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A novel insight into the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory

A. Pavlovič, M. Saganová,

. 2015 ; 115 (7) : 1075-92. [pub] 20150506

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16010227
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory provides a conceptual framework for interpreting a wide range of comparative and experimental studies on carnivorous plants. This model assumes that the modified leaves called traps represent a significant cost for the plant, and this cost is outweighed by the benefits from increased nutrient uptake from prey, in terms of enhancing the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf mass or area (AN) in the microsites inhabited by carnivorous plants. SCOPE: This review summarizes results from the classical interpretation of the cost-benefit model for evolution of botanical carnivory and highlights the costs and benefits of active trapping mechanisms, including water pumping, electrical signalling and accumulation of jasmonates. Novel alternative sequestration strategies (utilization of leaf litter and faeces) in carnivorous plants are also discussed in the context of the cost-benefit model. CONCLUSIONS: Traps of carnivorous plants have lower AN than leaves, and the leaves have higher AN after feeding. Prey digestion, water pumping and electrical signalling represent a significant carbon cost (as an increased rate of respiration, RD) for carnivorous plants. On the other hand, jasmonate accumulation during the digestive period and reprogramming of gene expression from growth and photosynthesis to prey digestion optimizes enzyme production in comparison with constitutive secretion. This inducibility may have evolved as a cost-saving strategy beneficial for carnivorous plants. The similarities between plant defence mechanisms and botanical carnivory are highlighted.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010227
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160412103943.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcv050 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcv050 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25948113
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Pavlovič, Andrej $u Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia pavlovic@fns.uniba.sk.
245    12
$a A novel insight into the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory / $c A. Pavlovič, M. Saganová,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory provides a conceptual framework for interpreting a wide range of comparative and experimental studies on carnivorous plants. This model assumes that the modified leaves called traps represent a significant cost for the plant, and this cost is outweighed by the benefits from increased nutrient uptake from prey, in terms of enhancing the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf mass or area (AN) in the microsites inhabited by carnivorous plants. SCOPE: This review summarizes results from the classical interpretation of the cost-benefit model for evolution of botanical carnivory and highlights the costs and benefits of active trapping mechanisms, including water pumping, electrical signalling and accumulation of jasmonates. Novel alternative sequestration strategies (utilization of leaf litter and faeces) in carnivorous plants are also discussed in the context of the cost-benefit model. CONCLUSIONS: Traps of carnivorous plants have lower AN than leaves, and the leaves have higher AN after feeding. Prey digestion, water pumping and electrical signalling represent a significant carbon cost (as an increased rate of respiration, RD) for carnivorous plants. On the other hand, jasmonate accumulation during the digestive period and reprogramming of gene expression from growth and photosynthesis to prey digestion optimizes enzyme production in comparison with constitutive secretion. This inducibility may have evolved as a cost-saving strategy beneficial for carnivorous plants. The similarities between plant defence mechanisms and botanical carnivory are highlighted.
650    12
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a Droseraceae $x fyziologie $7 D031257
650    12
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    12
$a fyziologie rostlin $7 D018521
650    _2
$a signální transdukce $7 D015398
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Saganová, Michaela $u Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 115, č. 7 (2015), s. 1075-92
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25948113 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160412104026 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113656 $s 934595
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 115 $c 7 $d 1075-92 $e 20150506 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...