-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A novel insight into the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory
A. Pavlovič, M. Saganová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy
NLK
PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
25948113
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcv050
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologická evoluce * MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- Droseraceae fyziologie MeSH
- fyziologie rostlin * MeSH
- signální transdukce MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory provides a conceptual framework for interpreting a wide range of comparative and experimental studies on carnivorous plants. This model assumes that the modified leaves called traps represent a significant cost for the plant, and this cost is outweighed by the benefits from increased nutrient uptake from prey, in terms of enhancing the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf mass or area (AN) in the microsites inhabited by carnivorous plants. SCOPE: This review summarizes results from the classical interpretation of the cost-benefit model for evolution of botanical carnivory and highlights the costs and benefits of active trapping mechanisms, including water pumping, electrical signalling and accumulation of jasmonates. Novel alternative sequestration strategies (utilization of leaf litter and faeces) in carnivorous plants are also discussed in the context of the cost-benefit model. CONCLUSIONS: Traps of carnivorous plants have lower AN than leaves, and the leaves have higher AN after feeding. Prey digestion, water pumping and electrical signalling represent a significant carbon cost (as an increased rate of respiration, RD) for carnivorous plants. On the other hand, jasmonate accumulation during the digestive period and reprogramming of gene expression from growth and photosynthesis to prey digestion optimizes enzyme production in comparison with constitutive secretion. This inducibility may have evolved as a cost-saving strategy beneficial for carnivorous plants. The similarities between plant defence mechanisms and botanical carnivory are highlighted.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16010227
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160412103943.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcv050 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcv050 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25948113
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Pavlovič, Andrej $u Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia pavlovic@fns.uniba.sk.
- 245 12
- $a A novel insight into the cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory / $c A. Pavlovič, M. Saganová,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit model for the evolution of botanical carnivory provides a conceptual framework for interpreting a wide range of comparative and experimental studies on carnivorous plants. This model assumes that the modified leaves called traps represent a significant cost for the plant, and this cost is outweighed by the benefits from increased nutrient uptake from prey, in terms of enhancing the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf mass or area (AN) in the microsites inhabited by carnivorous plants. SCOPE: This review summarizes results from the classical interpretation of the cost-benefit model for evolution of botanical carnivory and highlights the costs and benefits of active trapping mechanisms, including water pumping, electrical signalling and accumulation of jasmonates. Novel alternative sequestration strategies (utilization of leaf litter and faeces) in carnivorous plants are also discussed in the context of the cost-benefit model. CONCLUSIONS: Traps of carnivorous plants have lower AN than leaves, and the leaves have higher AN after feeding. Prey digestion, water pumping and electrical signalling represent a significant carbon cost (as an increased rate of respiration, RD) for carnivorous plants. On the other hand, jasmonate accumulation during the digestive period and reprogramming of gene expression from growth and photosynthesis to prey digestion optimizes enzyme production in comparison with constitutive secretion. This inducibility may have evolved as a cost-saving strategy beneficial for carnivorous plants. The similarities between plant defence mechanisms and botanical carnivory are highlighted.
- 650 12
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a Droseraceae $x fyziologie $7 D031257
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 12
- $a fyziologie rostlin $7 D018521
- 650 _2
- $a signální transdukce $7 D015398
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Saganová, Michaela $u Department of Biophysics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina B2, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 115, č. 7 (2015), s. 1075-92
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25948113 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160412104026 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113656 $s 934595
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 115 $c 7 $d 1075-92 $e 20150506 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408