-
Something wrong with this record ?
Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem
M. Heurich, TT. Brand, MY. Kaandorp, P. Šustr, J. Müller, B. Reineking,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Forests * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Parks, Recreational * MeSH
- Deer * MeSH
- Conservation of Natural Resources * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Germany MeSH
The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.
Department of Conservation and Research Bavarian Forest National Park Grafenau Germany
Šumava National Park Vimperk Czech Republic
UR EMGR Écosystèmes Montagnards St Martin d'Hères France
Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences Leeuwarden The Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16010442
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160408112341.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0120960 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0120960 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25781942
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Heurich, Marco $u Department of Conservation and Research, Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany; Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Freiburg, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem / $c M. Heurich, TT. Brand, MY. Kaandorp, P. Šustr, J. Müller, B. Reineking,
- 520 9_
- $a The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
- 650 12
- $a vysoká zvěř $7 D003670
- 650 12
- $a lesy $7 D065928
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a veřejné parky $7 D000068316
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Německo $7 D005858
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Brand, Tom T G $u Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Kaandorp, Manon Y $u Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Šustr, Pavel $u Department of Biodiversity Research, Global Change Research Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic; Šumava National Park, Vimperk, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Müller, Jörg $u Department of Conservation and Research, Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany; Chair for Terrestrial Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Reineking, Björn $u Biogeographical Modelling, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany; UR EMGR Écosystèmes Montagnards, St.-Martin-d'Hères, France.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 3 (2015), s. e0120960
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25781942 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160408112419 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113871 $s 934810
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 10 $c 3 $d e0120960 $e 20150317 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408