• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Work of Breathing into Snow in the Presence versus Absence of an Artificial Air Pocket Affects Hypoxia and Hypercapnia of a Victim Covered with Avalanche Snow: A Randomized Double Blind Crossover Study

K. Roubík, L. Sieger, K. Sykora,

. 2015 ; 10 (12) : e0144332. [pub] 20151214

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16020092

Presence of an air pocket and its size play an important role in survival of victims buried in the avalanche snow. Even small air pockets facilitate breathing. We hypothesize that the size of the air pocket significantly affects the airflow resistance and work of breathing. The aims of the study are (1) to investigate the effect of the presence of an air pocket on gas exchange and work of breathing in subjects breathing into the simulated avalanche snow and (2) to test whether it is possible to breathe with no air pocket. The prospective interventional double-blinded study involved 12 male volunteers, from which 10 completed the whole protocol. Each volunteer underwent two phases of the experiment in a random order: phase "AP"--breathing into the snow with a one-liter air pocket, and phase "NP"--breathing into the snow with no air pocket. Physiological parameters, fractions of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the airways and work of breathing expressed as pressure-time product were recorded continuously. The main finding of the study is that it is possible to breath in the avalanche snow even with no air pocket (0 L volume), but breathing under this condition is associated with significantly increased work of breathing. The significant differences were initially observed for end-tidal values of the respiratory gases (EtO2 and EtCO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) between AP and NP phases, whereas significant differences in inspiratory fractions occurred much later (for FIO2) or never (for FICO2). The limiting factor in no air pocket conditions is excessive increase in work of breathing that induces increase in metabolism accompanied by higher oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. The presence of even a small air pocket reduces significantly the work of breathing.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020092
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160722115931.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144332 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0144332 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26666523
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Roubík, Karel $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Work of Breathing into Snow in the Presence versus Absence of an Artificial Air Pocket Affects Hypoxia and Hypercapnia of a Victim Covered with Avalanche Snow: A Randomized Double Blind Crossover Study / $c K. Roubík, L. Sieger, K. Sykora,
520    9_
$a Presence of an air pocket and its size play an important role in survival of victims buried in the avalanche snow. Even small air pockets facilitate breathing. We hypothesize that the size of the air pocket significantly affects the airflow resistance and work of breathing. The aims of the study are (1) to investigate the effect of the presence of an air pocket on gas exchange and work of breathing in subjects breathing into the simulated avalanche snow and (2) to test whether it is possible to breathe with no air pocket. The prospective interventional double-blinded study involved 12 male volunteers, from which 10 completed the whole protocol. Each volunteer underwent two phases of the experiment in a random order: phase "AP"--breathing into the snow with a one-liter air pocket, and phase "NP"--breathing into the snow with no air pocket. Physiological parameters, fractions of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the airways and work of breathing expressed as pressure-time product were recorded continuously. The main finding of the study is that it is possible to breath in the avalanche snow even with no air pocket (0 L volume), but breathing under this condition is associated with significantly increased work of breathing. The significant differences were initially observed for end-tidal values of the respiratory gases (EtO2 and EtCO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) between AP and NP phases, whereas significant differences in inspiratory fractions occurred much later (for FIO2) or never (for FICO2). The limiting factor in no air pocket conditions is excessive increase in work of breathing that induces increase in metabolism accompanied by higher oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. The presence of even a small air pocket reduces significantly the work of breathing.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a hypoxie $x patofyziologie $7 D000860
650    _2
$a asfyxie $x patofyziologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D001237
650    12
$a laviny $7 D055875
650    _2
$a oxid uhličitý $x fyziologie $7 D002245
650    _2
$a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
650    12
$a katastrofy $7 D004190
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hyperkapnie $x patofyziologie $7 D006935
650    _2
$a inspirační rezervní objem $x fyziologie $7 D007321
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $7 D008991
650    _2
$a kyslík $x fyziologie $7 D010100
650    _2
$a sníh $7 D012914
650    _2
$a dechový objem $x fyziologie $7 D013990
650    _2
$a dechová práce $x fyziologie $7 D014939
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sieger, Ladislav $u Department of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sykora, Karel $u Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 10, č. 12 (2015), s. e0144332
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26666523 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160722120145 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1154762 $s 944620
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 10 $c 12 $d e0144332 $e 20151214 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace