• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer

J. Cvek, L. Knybel, E. Skacelikova, J. Stransky, P. Matousek, K. Zelenik, O. Res, B. Otahal, L. Molenda, D. Feltl,

. 2016 ; 192 (1) : 40-6. [pub] 20150828

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16020349
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2006-08-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation (re-RT) as a treatment for inoperable, recurrent, or second primary head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) that is not suitable for systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with recurrent or second primary HNSCC were included in this study. The patients had a median gross tumor volume of 76 ml (range 14-193 ml) and a previous radiotherapy dose greater than 60 Gy. Treatment was designed to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV, defined as gross tumor volume [GTV] + 3 mm to account for microscopic spreading, with no additional set-up margin) with the prescribed dose (48 Gy in 16 fractions b.i.d.). Treatment was administered twice daily with a minimum 6 h gap. Uninvolved lymph nodes were not irradiated. RESULTS: Treatment was completed as planned for all patients (with median duration of 11 days, range 9-14 days). Acute toxicity was evaluated using the RTOG/EORTC scale. A 37 % incidence of grade 3 mucositis was observed, with recovery time of ≤ 4 weeks for all of these patients. Acute skin toxicity was never observed to be higher than grade 2. Late toxicity was also evaluated according to the RTOG/EORTC scale. Mandible radionecrosis was seen in 4 cases (10 %); however, neither carotid blowout syndrome nor other grade 4 late toxicity occurred. One-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (L-PFS) were found to be 33 and 44 %, respectively. Performance status and GTV proved to be significant prognostic factors regarding local control and survival. CONCLUSION: Hyperfractionated stereotactic re-RT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with recurrent/second primary HNSCC who were previously exposed to high-dose irradiation and who are not candidates for systemic treatment or hypofractionation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020349
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160809110536.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00066-015-0886-3 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00066-015-0886-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26314584
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Cvek, Jakub $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jakub.cvek@fno.cz.
245    10
$a Hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer / $c J. Cvek, L. Knybel, E. Skacelikova, J. Stransky, P. Matousek, K. Zelenik, O. Res, B. Otahal, L. Molenda, D. Feltl,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated stereotactic reirradiation (re-RT) as a treatment for inoperable, recurrent, or second primary head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) that is not suitable for systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with recurrent or second primary HNSCC were included in this study. The patients had a median gross tumor volume of 76 ml (range 14-193 ml) and a previous radiotherapy dose greater than 60 Gy. Treatment was designed to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV, defined as gross tumor volume [GTV] + 3 mm to account for microscopic spreading, with no additional set-up margin) with the prescribed dose (48 Gy in 16 fractions b.i.d.). Treatment was administered twice daily with a minimum 6 h gap. Uninvolved lymph nodes were not irradiated. RESULTS: Treatment was completed as planned for all patients (with median duration of 11 days, range 9-14 days). Acute toxicity was evaluated using the RTOG/EORTC scale. A 37 % incidence of grade 3 mucositis was observed, with recovery time of ≤ 4 weeks for all of these patients. Acute skin toxicity was never observed to be higher than grade 2. Late toxicity was also evaluated according to the RTOG/EORTC scale. Mandible radionecrosis was seen in 4 cases (10 %); however, neither carotid blowout syndrome nor other grade 4 late toxicity occurred. One-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (L-PFS) were found to be 33 and 44 %, respectively. Performance status and GTV proved to be significant prognostic factors regarding local control and survival. CONCLUSION: Hyperfractionated stereotactic re-RT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with recurrent/second primary HNSCC who were previously exposed to high-dose irradiation and who are not candidates for systemic treatment or hypofractionation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a spinocelulární karcinom $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D002294
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a sekundární malignity $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D016609
650    _2
$a otorinolaryngologické nádory $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D010039
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a radiochirurgie $x metody $7 D016634
650    _2
$a opakovaná terapie $7 D019233
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Knybel, Lukas $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Skacelikova, Eva $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stransky, Jiri $u Department of Maxilofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matousek, Petr $u Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zelenik, Karol $u Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Res, Oldrich $u Department of Maxilofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Otahal, Bretislav $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Molenda, Lukas $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Feltl, David $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00010658 $t Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Organ der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft ... [et al] $x 1439-099X $g Roč. 192, č. 1 (2016), s. 40-6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26314584 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160809110813 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155019 $s 944877
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 192 $c 1 $d 40-6 $e 20150828 $i 1439-099X $m Strahlentherapie und Onkologie $n Strahlenther Onkol $x MED00010658
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...