-
Something wrong with this record ?
Is UV radiation changing the toxicity of compounds to zebrafish embryos
AR. Almeida, TS. Andrade, V. Burkina, G. Fedorova, S. Loureiro, AM. Soares, I. Domingues,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local toxicity MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical toxicity MeSH
- Zebrafish MeSH
- Potassium Dichromate toxicity MeSH
- Embryo, Nonmammalian drug effects radiation effects MeSH
- Imidazoles toxicity MeSH
- Fungicides, Industrial toxicity MeSH
- Triclosan toxicity MeSH
- Ultraviolet Rays * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
At ecosystems level, environmental parameters such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and intensity of UV radiation (UVR) have an important role on the efficiency of organisms' physiological and behavioral performances and consequently on the capacity of response to contaminants. Insignificant alterations of these parameters may compromise this response. In addition, these parameters can additionally alter chemical compounds by inducing their degradation, producing thereafter other metabolites. Understanding the combined effects of chemicals and environmental parameters is absolutely necessary for an adequate prediction of risk in aquatic environments. According to this scenario, this work aims at studying the combined toxicity of UVR and three xenobiotics: the biocide triclosan (TCS), the metal chromium (as potassium dichromate, PD) and the fungicide prochloraz (PCZ). To achieve this goal zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos (3h post fertilization (hpf)) were exposed to several concentrations of each chemical combined with different UV intensities; mortality and eggs were recorded every 24h for the all test duration (96 h). Results showed different response patterns depending on the toxicant, stress levels and duration of exposure. The combination of UVR and TCS indicated a dose ratio deviation where synergism was observed when UVR was the dominant stressor (day 2). The combination of UVR and PD presented a dose level dependency at day 3 indicating antagonism at low stress levels, changing with time where at day 4, a dose ratio deviation showed statistically that synergism occurred at higher PD concentrations. Finally, UVR combined with PCZ indicated a dose ratio at day 3 and dose level deviation at day 4 of exposure, suggesting a synergistic response when PCZ is the dominant stressor in the combination. The obtained results in this study highlighted the importance of taking into account the possible interaction of stressors and time of exposure to better predict environmental risk.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020456
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160726104654.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.021 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.021 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26232041
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Almeida, Ana Rita $u Department of Biology & CESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), University of Aveiro, Portugal, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810 Aveiro, Portugal. Electronic address: rita.almeida@ua.pt. $7 gn_A_00004618
- 245 10
- $a Is UV radiation changing the toxicity of compounds to zebrafish embryos / $c AR. Almeida, TS. Andrade, V. Burkina, G. Fedorova, S. Loureiro, AM. Soares, I. Domingues,
- 520 9_
- $a At ecosystems level, environmental parameters such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and intensity of UV radiation (UVR) have an important role on the efficiency of organisms' physiological and behavioral performances and consequently on the capacity of response to contaminants. Insignificant alterations of these parameters may compromise this response. In addition, these parameters can additionally alter chemical compounds by inducing their degradation, producing thereafter other metabolites. Understanding the combined effects of chemicals and environmental parameters is absolutely necessary for an adequate prediction of risk in aquatic environments. According to this scenario, this work aims at studying the combined toxicity of UVR and three xenobiotics: the biocide triclosan (TCS), the metal chromium (as potassium dichromate, PD) and the fungicide prochloraz (PCZ). To achieve this goal zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos (3h post fertilization (hpf)) were exposed to several concentrations of each chemical combined with different UV intensities; mortality and eggs were recorded every 24h for the all test duration (96 h). Results showed different response patterns depending on the toxicant, stress levels and duration of exposure. The combination of UVR and TCS indicated a dose ratio deviation where synergism was observed when UVR was the dominant stressor (day 2). The combination of UVR and PD presented a dose level dependency at day 3 indicating antagonism at low stress levels, changing with time where at day 4, a dose ratio deviation showed statistically that synergism occurred at higher PD concentrations. Finally, UVR combined with PCZ indicated a dose ratio at day 3 and dose level deviation at day 4 of exposure, suggesting a synergistic response when PCZ is the dominant stressor in the combination. The obtained results in this study highlighted the importance of taking into account the possible interaction of stressors and time of exposure to better predict environmental risk.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antiinfekční látky lokální $x toxicita $7 D000891
- 650 _2
- $a embryo nesavčí $x účinky léků $x účinky záření $7 D004625
- 650 _2
- $a průmyslové fungicidy $x toxicita $7 D005659
- 650 _2
- $a imidazoly $x toxicita $7 D007093
- 650 _2
- $a dvojchroman draselný $x toxicita $7 D011192
- 650 _2
- $a triclosan $x toxicita $7 D014260
- 650 12
- $a ultrafialové záření $7 D014466
- 650 _2
- $a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x toxicita $7 D014874
- 650 _2
- $a dánio pruhované $7 D015027
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Andrade, Thayres S $u Department of Biology & CESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), University of Aveiro, Portugal, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810 Aveiro, Portugal. $7 gn_A_00006291
- 700 1_
- $a Burkina, Viktoriia $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, Vodnany 389 25, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fedorova, Ganna $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, Vodnany 389 25, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Loureiro, Susana $u Department of Biology & CESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), University of Aveiro, Portugal, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810 Aveiro, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Soares, Amadeu M V M $u Department of Biology & CESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), University of Aveiro, Portugal, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810 Aveiro, Portugal; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Campus de Gurupi, Rua Badejós, Zona Rural, Cx Postal 66, CEP 77402-970 Gurupi, TO, Brasil.
- 700 1_
- $a Domingues, Inês $u Department of Biology & CESAM (Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies), University of Aveiro, Portugal, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810 Aveiro, Portugal.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001478 $t Ecotoxicology and environmental safety $x 1090-2414 $g Roč. 122, č. - (2015), s. 145-52
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26232041 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160726104913 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155126 $s 944984
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 122 $c - $d 145-52 $e 20150729 $i 1090-2414 $m Ecotoxicology and environmental safety $n Ecotoxicol Environ Safety $x MED00001478
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722