-
Something wrong with this record ?
EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
J. Kautzner, P. Neuzil, H. Lambert, P. Peichl, J. Petru, R. Cihak, J. Skoda, D. Wichterle, E. Wissner, A. Yulzari, KH. Kuck,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1999 to 1 year ago
PubMed Central
from 2008
Open Access Digital Library
from 1999-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1999-01-01
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
from 1999-01-01
- MeSH
- Equipment Failure Analysis MeSH
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted instrumentation methods MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Catheter Ablation instrumentation methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Body Surface Potential Mapping instrumentation methods MeSH
- Stress, Mechanical MeSH
- Transducers, Pressure MeSH
- Heart Conduction System surgery MeSH
- Pulmonary Veins surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
AIMS: A challenge of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is electrical reconnection of the PV. EFFICAS I showed correlation between contact force (CF) parameters and PV durable isolation but no prospective evaluation was made. EFFICAS II was a multicentre study to prospectively assess the impact of CF guidance for an effective reduction of PVI gaps. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with an integrated force sensor (TactiCathTM) was performed in patients with PAF. Operators were provided EFFICAS I-based CF guidelines [target 20 g, range 10-30 g, minimum 400 g s force-time integral (FTI)]. Conduction gaps were assessed by remapping of PVs after 3 months, and gap rate was compared with EFFICAS I outcome. At follow up, 24 patients had 85% of PVs remaining isolated, compared with 72% in EFFICAS I (P = 0.037) in which CF guidelines were not used. The remaining 15% of gaps correlated to the number of catheter moves at creating the PVI line, quantified as Continuity Index. For PV lines with contiguous lesions and low catheter moves, durable isolation was 81% in EFFICAS I and 98% in EFFICAS II (P = 0.005). At index procedure, the number of lesions was reduced by 15% in EFFICAS II vs. EFFICAS I. CONCLUSION: The use of CF with the above guidelines and contiguous deployment of RF lesions in EFFICAS II study resulted in more durable PVI in catheter ablation of PAF.
Abt Kardiologie Asklepios Klinik St Georg Hamburg Germany
Department of Cardiology Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020709
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220526090225.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/europace/euv057 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/europace/euv057 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26041872
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kautzner, Josef $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Videnska 1958/9, Prague 14201, Czech Republic josef.kautzner@ikem.cz.
- 245 10
- $a EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation / $c J. Kautzner, P. Neuzil, H. Lambert, P. Peichl, J. Petru, R. Cihak, J. Skoda, D. Wichterle, E. Wissner, A. Yulzari, KH. Kuck,
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: A challenge of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is electrical reconnection of the PV. EFFICAS I showed correlation between contact force (CF) parameters and PV durable isolation but no prospective evaluation was made. EFFICAS II was a multicentre study to prospectively assess the impact of CF guidance for an effective reduction of PVI gaps. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with an integrated force sensor (TactiCathTM) was performed in patients with PAF. Operators were provided EFFICAS I-based CF guidelines [target 20 g, range 10-30 g, minimum 400 g s force-time integral (FTI)]. Conduction gaps were assessed by remapping of PVs after 3 months, and gap rate was compared with EFFICAS I outcome. At follow up, 24 patients had 85% of PVs remaining isolated, compared with 72% in EFFICAS I (P = 0.037) in which CF guidelines were not used. The remaining 15% of gaps correlated to the number of catheter moves at creating the PVI line, quantified as Continuity Index. For PV lines with contiguous lesions and low catheter moves, durable isolation was 81% in EFFICAS I and 98% in EFFICAS II (P = 0.005). At index procedure, the number of lesions was reduced by 15% in EFFICAS II vs. EFFICAS I. CONCLUSION: The use of CF with the above guidelines and contiguous deployment of RF lesions in EFFICAS II study resulted in more durable PVI in catheter ablation of PAF.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a fibrilace síní $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D001281
- 650 _2
- $a mapování potenciálů tělesného povrchu $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D018780
- 650 _2
- $a katetrizační ablace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a design vybavení $7 D004867
- 650 _2
- $a analýza selhání vybavení $7 D019544
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a převodní systém srdeční $x chirurgie $7 D006329
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
- 650 _2
- $a mechanický stres $7 D013314
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgie s pomocí počítače $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D025321
- 650 _2
- $a měniče tlakové $7 D014160
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Neuzil, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lambert, Hendrik $u St Jude Medical GVA, Geneva, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Peichl, Petr, $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Videnska 1958/9, Prague 14201, Czech Republic. $d 1976- $7 xx0092197
- 700 1_
- $a Petru, Jan $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cihak, Robert $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Videnska 1958/9, Prague 14201, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Skoda, Jan $u Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wichterle, Dan $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Videnska 1958/9, Prague 14201, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wissner, Erik $u Abt Kardiologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Yulzari, Aude $u St Jude Medical GVA, Geneva, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Kuck, Karl-Heinz, $u Abt Kardiologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany. $d 1952- $7 xx0273250
- 773 0_
- $w MED00149837 $t Europace European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 17, č. 8 (2015), s. 1229-35
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26041872 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220526090219 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155379 $s 945237
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 17 $c 8 $d 1229-35 $e 20150603 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722