-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Testing two nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages marketed in Turkey
D. Dikmen, M. Kızıl, M. F. Uyar, G. Pekcan
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
ProQuest Central
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1993
- MeSH
- analýza potravin MeSH
- informace pro uživatele zdravotní péče normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nápoje klasifikace normy MeSH
- nutriční hodnota * MeSH
- označování výrobků * MeSH
- potraviny klasifikace normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Turecko MeSH
AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutrient profile of labelled foods and also understand the application of two international nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages. METHODS: WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models were used to evaluate 3,171 labelled foods and beverages of 38 food categories and 500 different brands. RESULTS: According to the WXYfm model, pasta, grains and legumes and frozen foods had the best scores whereas oils had the worst scores. According to the NRF 9.3 model per 100 kcal, the best scores were obtained for frozen foods, grains and legumes and milk products whereas the confectionery foods had the worst scores. According to NRF 9.3 per serving size, grains and legumes had the best scores and flavoured milks had the worst scores. A comparison of WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models ranked scores showed a high positive correlation (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The two nutrient models evaluated yielded similar results. Further studies are needed to test other category specific nutrient profiling models in order to understand how different models behave.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16025179
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160926111226.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160913s2015 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a3992 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26851427
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Dikmen, Derya $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 245 10
- $a Testing two nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages marketed in Turkey / $c D. Dikmen, M. Kızıl, M. F. Uyar, G. Pekcan
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutrient profile of labelled foods and also understand the application of two international nutrient profiling models of labelled foods and beverages. METHODS: WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models were used to evaluate 3,171 labelled foods and beverages of 38 food categories and 500 different brands. RESULTS: According to the WXYfm model, pasta, grains and legumes and frozen foods had the best scores whereas oils had the worst scores. According to the NRF 9.3 model per 100 kcal, the best scores were obtained for frozen foods, grains and legumes and milk products whereas the confectionery foods had the worst scores. According to NRF 9.3 per serving size, grains and legumes had the best scores and flavoured milks had the worst scores. A comparison of WXYfm and NRF 9.3 nutrient profiling models ranked scores showed a high positive correlation (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The two nutrient models evaluated yielded similar results. Further studies are needed to test other category specific nutrient profiling models in order to understand how different models behave.
- 650 _2
- $a nápoje $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D001628
- 650 _2
- $a informace pro uživatele zdravotní péče $x normy $7 D054626
- 650 _2
- $a potraviny $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D005502
- 650 _2
- $a analýza potravin $7 D005504
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nutriční hodnota $7 D009753
- 650 12
- $a označování výrobků $7 D011356
- 651 _2
- $a Turecko $7 D014421
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kızıl, Mevlüde $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Uyar, Muhemmet Fatih $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Pekcan, Gülden $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2015), s. 131-136 (e 155-160)
- 856 41
- $u http://apps.szu.cz/svi/cejph/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160913 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160926111601 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1163250 $s 949765
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 23 $c 2 $d 131-136 $f 155-160 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20160913