Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Inter-Reader Reliability of Early FDG-PET/CT Response Assessment Using the Deauville Scale after 2 Cycles of Intensive Chemotherapy (OEPA) in Hodgkin's Lymphoma

R. Kluge, L. Chavdarova, M. Hoffmann, C. Kobe, B. Malkowski, F. Montravers, L. Kurch, T. Georgi, M. Dietlein, WH. Wallace, J. Karlen, A. Fernández-Teijeiro, M. Cepelova, L. Wilson, E. Bergstraesser, O. Sabri, C. Mauz-Körholz, D. Körholz, D. Hasenclever,

. 2016 ; 11 (3) : e0149072. [pub] 20160310

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16027597

PURPOSE: The five point Deauville (D) scale is widely used to assess interim PET metabolic response to chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. An International Validation Study reported good concordance among reviewers in ABVD treated advanced stage HL patients for the binary discrimination between score D1,2,3 and score D4,5. Inter-reader reliability of the whole scale is not well characterised. METHODS: Five international expert readers scored 100 interim PET/CT scans from paediatric HL patients. Scans were acquired in 51 European hospitals after two courses of OEPA chemotherapy (according to the EuroNet-PHL-C1 study). Images were interpreted in direct comparison with staging PET/CTs. RESULTS: The probability that two random readers concord on the five point D score of a random case is only 42% (global kappa = 0.24). Aggregating to a three point scale D1,2 vs. D3 vs. D4,5 improves concordance to 60% (kappa = 0.34). Concordance if one of two readers assigns a given score is 70% for score D1,2 only 36% for score D3 and 64% for D4,5. Concordance for the binary decisions D1,2 vs. D3,4,5 is 67% and 86% for D1,2,3 vs D4,5 (kappa = 0.36 resp. 0.56). If one reader assigns D1,2,3 concordance probability is 92%, but only 64% if D4,5 is called. Discrepancies occur mainly in mediastinum, neck and skeleton. CONCLUSION: Inter-reader reliability of the five point D-scale is poor in this interobserver analysis of paediatric patients who underwent OEPA. Inter-reader variability is maximal in cases assigned to D2 or D3. The binary distinction D1,2,3 versus D4,5 is the most reliable criterion for clinical decision making.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16027597
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161005132207.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0149072 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0149072 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26963909
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kluge, Regine $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
245    10
$a Inter-Reader Reliability of Early FDG-PET/CT Response Assessment Using the Deauville Scale after 2 Cycles of Intensive Chemotherapy (OEPA) in Hodgkin's Lymphoma / $c R. Kluge, L. Chavdarova, M. Hoffmann, C. Kobe, B. Malkowski, F. Montravers, L. Kurch, T. Georgi, M. Dietlein, WH. Wallace, J. Karlen, A. Fernández-Teijeiro, M. Cepelova, L. Wilson, E. Bergstraesser, O. Sabri, C. Mauz-Körholz, D. Körholz, D. Hasenclever,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The five point Deauville (D) scale is widely used to assess interim PET metabolic response to chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. An International Validation Study reported good concordance among reviewers in ABVD treated advanced stage HL patients for the binary discrimination between score D1,2,3 and score D4,5. Inter-reader reliability of the whole scale is not well characterised. METHODS: Five international expert readers scored 100 interim PET/CT scans from paediatric HL patients. Scans were acquired in 51 European hospitals after two courses of OEPA chemotherapy (according to the EuroNet-PHL-C1 study). Images were interpreted in direct comparison with staging PET/CTs. RESULTS: The probability that two random readers concord on the five point D score of a random case is only 42% (global kappa = 0.24). Aggregating to a three point scale D1,2 vs. D3 vs. D4,5 improves concordance to 60% (kappa = 0.34). Concordance if one of two readers assigns a given score is 70% for score D1,2 only 36% for score D3 and 64% for D4,5. Concordance for the binary decisions D1,2 vs. D3,4,5 is 67% and 86% for D1,2,3 vs D4,5 (kappa = 0.36 resp. 0.56). If one reader assigns D1,2,3 concordance probability is 92%, but only 64% if D4,5 is called. Discrepancies occur mainly in mediastinum, neck and skeleton. CONCLUSION: Inter-reader reliability of the five point D-scale is poor in this interobserver analysis of paediatric patients who underwent OEPA. Inter-reader variability is maximal in cases assigned to D2 or D3. The binary distinction D1,2,3 versus D4,5 is the most reliable criterion for clinical decision making.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000971
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a doxorubicin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D004317
650    _2
$a etoposid $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D005047
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a glukosa-6-fosfát $x aplikace a dávkování $x analogy a deriváty $7 D019298
650    _2
$a Hodgkinova nemoc $x farmakoterapie $x radiografie $7 D006689
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
650    _2
$a prednison $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D011241
650    12
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a vinkristin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D014750
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Chavdarova, Lidia $u Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, National Hospital for Active Treatment in Oncology, Sofia, Bulgaria.
700    1_
$a Hoffmann, Martha $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Kobe, Carsten $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
700    1_
$a Malkowski, Bogdan $u Dept. of PET and Molecular Imaging, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium MedicumBydgoszcz, Poland.
700    1_
$a Montravers, Françoise $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hopital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Kurch, Lars $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
700    1_
$a Georgi, Thomas $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
700    1_
$a Dietlein, Markus $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
700    1_
$a Wallace, W Hamish $u Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Karlen, Jonas $u Karolinska University Hospital, Astrid Lindgrens Childrens Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana $u Pediatric Oncology Unit, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
700    1_
$a Cepelova, Michaela $u Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Motol and 2nd Medical Faculty of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wilson, Lorrain $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
700    1_
$a Bergstraesser, Eva $u Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Sabri, Osama $u Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
700    1_
$a Mauz-Körholz, Christine $u Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Halle, Halle/Saale, Germany.
700    1_
$a Körholz, Dieter $u Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Halle, Halle/Saale, Germany.
700    1_
$a Hasenclever, Dirk $u Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 11, č. 3 (2016), s. e0149072
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26963909 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161005132554 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1165911 $s 952227
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 11 $c 3 $d e0149072 $e 20160310 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace