-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
A. Kobesova, M. Nyvltova, J. Kraus, P. Kolar, A. Sardina, R. Mazanec, R. Andel,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2001-04-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2001-04-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2001-04-01 do Před 2 měsíci
- MeSH
- Charcotova-Marieova-Toothova nemoc patofyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- funkční lateralita fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- motorické dovednosti fyziologie MeSH
- neurologické vyšetření MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- síla ruky fyziologie MeSH
- svalová síla - dynamometr MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
STUDY DESIGN: Matched pair study. INTRODUCTION: Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not well understood. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). RESULTS: Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000527
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170119095357.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26847322
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kobesova, Alena $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: alenamudr@me.com.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease / $c A. Kobesova, M. Nyvltova, J. Kraus, P. Kolar, A. Sardina, R. Mazanec, R. Andel,
- 520 9_
- $a STUDY DESIGN: Matched pair study. INTRODUCTION: Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not well understood. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). RESULTS: Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a Charcotova-Marieova-Toothova nemoc $x patofyziologie $7 D002607
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a funkční lateralita $x fyziologie $7 D007839
- 650 _2
- $a síla ruky $x fyziologie $7 D018737
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a motorické dovednosti $x fyziologie $7 D009048
- 650 _2
- $a svalová síla - dynamometr $7 D053581
- 650 _2
- $a neurologické vyšetření $7 D009460
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Nyvltova, Marcela $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kraus, Josef $u Department of Child Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kolar, Pavel $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sardina, Angela $u School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Mazanec, Radim $u Department of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Andel, Ross $u School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. $7 xx0219748
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008738 $t Journal of hand therapy official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists $x 1545-004X $g Roč. 29, č. 1 (2015), s. 66-72; quiz 72
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847322 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170119095506 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1179667 $s 961094
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 29 $c 1 $d 66-72; quiz 72 $e 20151213 $i 1545-004X $m Journal of hand therapy $n J Hand Ther $x MED00008738
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103
