-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
A. Kobesova, M. Nyvltova, J. Kraus, P. Kolar, A. Sardina, R. Mazanec, R. Andel,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2001-04-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2001-04-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2001-04-01 to 2 months ago
- MeSH
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease physiopathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Functional Laterality physiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Motor Skills physiology MeSH
- Neurologic Examination MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Hand Strength physiology MeSH
- Muscle Strength Dynamometer MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
STUDY DESIGN: Matched pair study. INTRODUCTION: Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not well understood. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). RESULTS: Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000527
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170119095357.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jht.2015.12.002 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26847322
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kobesova, Alena $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: alenamudr@me.com.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of muscle strength and manual dexterity in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease / $c A. Kobesova, M. Nyvltova, J. Kraus, P. Kolar, A. Sardina, R. Mazanec, R. Andel,
- 520 9_
- $a STUDY DESIGN: Matched pair study. INTRODUCTION: Differences in hand-muscle strength/dexterity between dominant (DH) and non-dominant (NDH) hand in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are not well understood. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To compare muscle strength/dexterity between DH and NDH and to correlate manual dexterity, strength and sensory function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty CMT patients were studied using functional muscle testing (FMT) and strength (dynamometry), dexterity (the Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT]), and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function [JTT]), and sensory function (the Nottingham Sensory Assessment [NSA]). RESULTS: Scores were worse for DH than NDH on FMT (p = 0.043) and NHPT (p = 0.014) but not on JTT (p = 0.098), handgrip strength (p = 0.710) or tripod pinch (p = 0.645). NSA did not correlate significantly with any tests (p's0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CMT disease, DH appears more impaired than NDH in terms of function and dexterity. Greater muscle weakness in DH may also emerge as CMT progresses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a Charcotova-Marieova-Toothova nemoc $x patofyziologie $7 D002607
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a funkční lateralita $x fyziologie $7 D007839
- 650 _2
- $a síla ruky $x fyziologie $7 D018737
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a motorické dovednosti $x fyziologie $7 D009048
- 650 _2
- $a svalová síla - dynamometr $7 D053581
- 650 _2
- $a neurologické vyšetření $7 D009460
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Nyvltova, Marcela $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kraus, Josef $u Department of Child Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kolar, Pavel $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sardina, Angela $u School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Mazanec, Radim $u Department of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Andel, Ross $u School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. $7 xx0219748
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008738 $t Journal of hand therapy official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists $x 1545-004X $g Roč. 29, č. 1 (2015), s. 66-72; quiz 72
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847322 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170119095506 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1179667 $s 961094
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 29 $c 1 $d 66-72; quiz 72 $e 20151213 $i 1545-004X $m Journal of hand therapy $n J Hand Ther $x MED00008738
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103
