-
Something wrong with this record ?
Continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw hydrolysate in a membrane bioreactor
O. Zahed, GS. Jouzani, S. Abbasalizadeh, F. Khodaiyan, M. Tabatabaei,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Biomass MeSH
- Bioreactors * MeSH
- Biotransformation MeSH
- Cellulose metabolism MeSH
- Nitrogen metabolism MeSH
- Ethanol metabolism MeSH
- Fermentation * MeSH
- Hydrolysis MeSH
- Kinetics MeSH
- Sulfuric Acids metabolism MeSH
- Oxygen metabolism MeSH
- Oryza metabolism microbiology MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism MeSH
- Xylitol metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The present study was set to develop a robust and economic biorefinery process for continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw in a membrane bioreactor. Acid pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, detoxification, yeast strains selection, single and co-culture batch fermentation, and finally continuous co-fermentation were optimized. The combination of diluted acid pretreatment (3.5 %) and enzymatic conversion (1:10 enzyme (63 floating-point unit (FPU)/mL)/biomass ratio) resulted in the maximum sugar yield (81 % conversion). By concentrating the hydrolysates, sugars level increased by threefold while that of furfural reduced by 50 % (0.56 to 0.28 g/L). Combined application of active carbon and resin led to complete removal of furfural, hydroxyl methyl furfural, and acetic acid. The strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCIM 3090 with 66.4 g/L ethanol production and Candida tropicalis NCIM 3119 with 9.9 g/L xylitol production were selected. The maximum concentrations of ethanol and xylitol in the single cultures were recorded at 31.5 g/L (0.42 g/g yield) and 26.5 g/L (0.58 g/g yield), respectively. In the batch co-culture system, the ethanol and xylitol productions were 33.4 g/L (0.44 g/g yield) and 25.1 g/L (0.55 g/g yield), respectively. The maximum ethanol and xylitol volumetric productivity values in the batch co-culture system were 65 and 58 % after 25 and 60 h, but were improved in the continuous co-culture mode and reached 80 % (55 g/L) and 68 % (31 g/L) at the dilution rate of 0.03 L per hour, respectively. Hence, the continuous co-production strategy developed in this study could be recommended for producing value-added products from this hugely generated lignocellulosic waste.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17004355
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170127122240.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170127s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-015-0420-0 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-015-0420-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26354791
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zahed, Omid $u Microbial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran. Department of Food Science, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
- 245 10
- $a Continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw hydrolysate in a membrane bioreactor / $c O. Zahed, GS. Jouzani, S. Abbasalizadeh, F. Khodaiyan, M. Tabatabaei,
- 520 9_
- $a The present study was set to develop a robust and economic biorefinery process for continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw in a membrane bioreactor. Acid pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, detoxification, yeast strains selection, single and co-culture batch fermentation, and finally continuous co-fermentation were optimized. The combination of diluted acid pretreatment (3.5 %) and enzymatic conversion (1:10 enzyme (63 floating-point unit (FPU)/mL)/biomass ratio) resulted in the maximum sugar yield (81 % conversion). By concentrating the hydrolysates, sugars level increased by threefold while that of furfural reduced by 50 % (0.56 to 0.28 g/L). Combined application of active carbon and resin led to complete removal of furfural, hydroxyl methyl furfural, and acetic acid. The strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCIM 3090 with 66.4 g/L ethanol production and Candida tropicalis NCIM 3119 with 9.9 g/L xylitol production were selected. The maximum concentrations of ethanol and xylitol in the single cultures were recorded at 31.5 g/L (0.42 g/g yield) and 26.5 g/L (0.58 g/g yield), respectively. In the batch co-culture system, the ethanol and xylitol productions were 33.4 g/L (0.44 g/g yield) and 25.1 g/L (0.55 g/g yield), respectively. The maximum ethanol and xylitol volumetric productivity values in the batch co-culture system were 65 and 58 % after 25 and 60 h, but were improved in the continuous co-culture mode and reached 80 % (55 g/L) and 68 % (31 g/L) at the dilution rate of 0.03 L per hour, respectively. Hence, the continuous co-production strategy developed in this study could be recommended for producing value-added products from this hugely generated lignocellulosic waste.
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 12
- $a bioreaktory $7 D019149
- 650 _2
- $a biotransformace $7 D001711
- 650 _2
- $a celulosa $x metabolismus $7 D002482
- 650 _2
- $a ethanol $x metabolismus $7 D000431
- 650 12
- $a fermentace $7 D005285
- 650 _2
- $a hydrolýza $7 D006868
- 650 _2
- $a kinetika $7 D007700
- 650 _2
- $a dusík $x metabolismus $7 D009584
- 650 _2
- $a rýže (rod) $x metabolismus $x mikrobiologie $7 D012275
- 650 _2
- $a kyslík $x metabolismus $7 D010100
- 650 _2
- $a Saccharomyces cerevisiae $x metabolismus $7 D012441
- 650 _2
- $a kyseliny sírové $x metabolismus $7 D013464
- 650 _2
- $a xylitol $x metabolismus $7 D014993
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi $u Microbial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran. gsalehi@abrii.ac.ir.
- 700 1_
- $a Abbasalizadeh, Saeed $u Microbial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran. $7 gn_A_00000222
- 700 1_
- $a Khodaiyan, Faramarz $u Department of Food Science, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
- 700 1_
- $a Tabatabaei, Meisam $u Microbial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran. Biofuel Research Team (BRTeam), Karaj, Iran.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 61, č. 3 (2016), s. 179-89
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26354791 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170127 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170127122359 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1185139 $s 964971
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 61 $c 3 $d 179-89 $e 20150909 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170127