-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of plasma osteopontin levels between patients with borderline ovarian tumours and serous ovarian carcinoma
J. H. Živný, S. Leahomschi, P. Klener, J. Živný, M. Haluzík, D. Cibula
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
Grant support
NT12248
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2000
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2000
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2000
- MeSH
- CA-125 Antigen blood MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Ovarian Neoplasms blood MeSH
- Osteopontin blood MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous blood MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Osteopontin (OPN) is a novel biomarker of various cancers including ovarian carcinoma. OPN is a promising adjunct to a major biomarker of ovarian cancer, CA125, in diagnosis, differential diagnosis and prognosis. The aim of our study was to measure the plasma level of OPN and CA125 in patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs), serous ovarian carcinoma, and controls to determine its potential role in the differential diagnosis between serous ovarian carcinoma and BOT. The plasma samples of 66 women were analysed using Luminex technology, designed to simultaneously measure multiple specific protein targets. The mean OPN plasma level for the control group was 23.3 ng/ml; for BOT 26.3 ng/ml; and for patients with serous ovarian carcinoma 59.5 ng/ml. Specifically, there was a significant difference between the OPN levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma and BOT (P < 0.001) as well as controls (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the mean levels of OPN in patients with BOT and the control group (P = 0.286). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), we determined the utility of OPN and CA125 to differentiate between BOT and serous ovarian carcinoma. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for OPN was 0.793 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.669-0.917, P < 0.001) and for CA125 0.766 (95% CI 0.626-0.907, P = 0.002). Based on our data, we suggest that OPN can be used as a possible differential diagnostic biomarker to distinguish between malignant serous ovarian carcinoma and BOT.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17010411
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181105134401.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170320s2016 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28189149
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Živný, Jan $u Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $7 xx0115576
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of plasma osteopontin levels between patients with borderline ovarian tumours and serous ovarian carcinoma / $c J. H. Živný, S. Leahomschi, P. Klener, J. Živný, M. Haluzík, D. Cibula
- 520 9_
- $a Osteopontin (OPN) is a novel biomarker of various cancers including ovarian carcinoma. OPN is a promising adjunct to a major biomarker of ovarian cancer, CA125, in diagnosis, differential diagnosis and prognosis. The aim of our study was to measure the plasma level of OPN and CA125 in patients with borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs), serous ovarian carcinoma, and controls to determine its potential role in the differential diagnosis between serous ovarian carcinoma and BOT. The plasma samples of 66 women were analysed using Luminex technology, designed to simultaneously measure multiple specific protein targets. The mean OPN plasma level for the control group was 23.3 ng/ml; for BOT 26.3 ng/ml; and for patients with serous ovarian carcinoma 59.5 ng/ml. Specifically, there was a significant difference between the OPN levels in patients with ovarian carcinoma and BOT (P < 0.001) as well as controls (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the mean levels of OPN in patients with BOT and the control group (P = 0.286). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), we determined the utility of OPN and CA125 to differentiate between BOT and serous ovarian carcinoma. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for OPN was 0.793 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.669-0.917, P < 0.001) and for CA125 0.766 (95% CI 0.626-0.907, P = 0.002). Based on our data, we suggest that OPN can be used as a possible differential diagnostic biomarker to distinguish between malignant serous ovarian carcinoma and BOT.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antigen CA-125 $x krev $7 D018394
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a serózní cystadenokarcinom $x krev $7 D018284
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a osteopontin $x krev $7 D053495
- 650 _2
- $a nádory vaječníků $x krev $7 D010051
- 650 _2
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Leahomschi, Sergiu $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic $7 _AN080817
- 700 1_
- $a Klener, Pavel, $u Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic $d 1975- $7 xx0105452
- 700 1_
- $a Živný, Jaroslav, $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic $d 1940- $7 jk01153185
- 700 1_
- $a Haluzík, Martin, $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic $d 1970- $7 xx0000707
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David, $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic $d 1968- $7 jo20000074072
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011004 $t Folia biologica $x 0015-5500 $g Roč. 62, č. 6 (2016), s. 258-262
- 856 41
- $u http://fb.cuni.cz/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 970 $c 89 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170320 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181105134435 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1196590 $s 971127
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 62 $c 6 $d 258-262 $i 0015-5500 $m Folia biologica (Praha) $n Folia biol. (Praha) $x MED00011004
- GRA __
- $a NT12248 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320