Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prospective comparison of conventional radiography, low-dose computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in monoclonal gammopathies

J. Minarik, P. Krhovska, J. Hrbek, T. Pika, J. Bacovsky, M. Herman, V. Scudla

. 2016 ; 160 (2) : 305-309. [pub] 20160105

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17012979

Grantová podpora
NT14393 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

AIMS: We carried out a prospective study in order to identify the best imaging approach for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). METHODS: We assessed the extent of myeloma bone disease (MBD) in 112 individuals - 84 patients with MM and 28 individuals with MGUS. For the detection of osteolytic involvement we used whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) and conventional radiography (CR). Each method assessed the presence of osteolytic involvement, compressive fractures and extramedullary involvement in the following regions: skull, spine and chest, pelvis and humerus and femur. We compared the difference in the number and extent of osteolytic involvement, especially the findings in CR negative patients. RESULTS: Conventional radiography showed no superiority in any of the evaluated regions, and failed in the detection of extramedullary massess and spine involvement. WB-MRI was best at imaging the spine including extramedullary involvement, however, detection of osteolytic lesions of the skull was limited in comparison with both CR and LD-CT. Both WB-MRI and LD-CT were comparable in imaging of lesions of pelvis, humerus, femur and the presence of extramedullary masses. LD-CT showed superiority in detection of skull lesions but lower sensitivity in spine compared to WB-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that relying solely on CR in the diagnostics of MM is insufficient. We suggest that the most suitable method for primary assessment of osteolytic involvement in monoclonal gammopathies should include either whole-body MRI together with CR of the skull or, with an equivalent sensitivity, whole body LD-CT.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17012979
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200430101121.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2016 xr a f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2015.064 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26740048
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Minařík, Jiří $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0106330
245    10
$a Prospective comparison of conventional radiography, low-dose computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in monoclonal gammopathies / $c J. Minarik, P. Krhovska, J. Hrbek, T. Pika, J. Bacovsky, M. Herman, V. Scudla
520    9_
$a AIMS: We carried out a prospective study in order to identify the best imaging approach for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). METHODS: We assessed the extent of myeloma bone disease (MBD) in 112 individuals - 84 patients with MM and 28 individuals with MGUS. For the detection of osteolytic involvement we used whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) and conventional radiography (CR). Each method assessed the presence of osteolytic involvement, compressive fractures and extramedullary involvement in the following regions: skull, spine and chest, pelvis and humerus and femur. We compared the difference in the number and extent of osteolytic involvement, especially the findings in CR negative patients. RESULTS: Conventional radiography showed no superiority in any of the evaluated regions, and failed in the detection of extramedullary massess and spine involvement. WB-MRI was best at imaging the spine including extramedullary involvement, however, detection of osteolytic lesions of the skull was limited in comparison with both CR and LD-CT. Both WB-MRI and LD-CT were comparable in imaging of lesions of pelvis, humerus, femur and the presence of extramedullary masses. LD-CT showed superiority in detection of skull lesions but lower sensitivity in spine compared to WB-MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that relying solely on CR in the diagnostics of MM is insufficient. We suggest that the most suitable method for primary assessment of osteolytic involvement in monoclonal gammopathies should include either whole-body MRI together with CR of the skull or, with an equivalent sensitivity, whole body LD-CT.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mnohočetný myelom $x diagnóza $7 D009101
650    _2
$a paraproteinemie $x diagnóza $7 D010265
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a dávka záření $7 D011829
650    _2
$a radiografie $7 D011859
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a celotělové zobrazování $x metody $7 D051598
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Krhovská, Petra $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0214569
700    1_
$a Hrbek, Jan $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0107300
700    1_
$a Pika, Tomáš $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0071238
700    1_
$a Bačovský, Jaroslav $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0053311
700    1_
$a Heřman, Miroslav, $d 1959- $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 jn20000400945
700    1_
$a Ščudla, Vlastimil, $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1946- $7 jn20000402953
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 160, č. 2 (2016), s. 305-309
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200430101116 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1205375 $s 973752
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 160 $c 2 $d 305-309 $e 20160105 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
GRA    __
$a NT14393 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170413

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace