-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Application of ethnobotanical repellents and acaricides in prevention, control and management of livestock ticks: A review
R. Pavela, A. Canale, H. Mehlhorn, G. Benelli,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
- MeSH
- akaricidy farmakologie MeSH
- dobytek * MeSH
- infestace klíšťaty farmakoterapie prevence a kontrola veterinární MeSH
- klíšťata účinky léků MeSH
- repelenty proti hmyzu farmakologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Ticks transmit at least the same number or even more pathogens than any other group of blood-feeding arthropods worldwide affecting humans and animals. The eco-friendly control and management of tick vectors in a constantly changing environment is a crucial challenge. Besides the development of vaccines against ticks, IPM practices aimed at reducing tick interactions with livestock, emerging pheromone-based control tools, and few biological control agents, the extensive employment of acaricides and tick repellents still remain the most effective and ready-to-use strategies. However, the former is limited by the development of growing resistances as well as environmental concerns. Exploiting plants and plant products as sources of effective tick repellents and acaricides represents a promising strategy. In this scenario, the preservation of ethnobotanical information on repellent and acaricidal potential of plants is crucial. Here, we evaluated relevant information published in recent years, focused on plants used as repellents and acaricides against tick vectors in different regions worldwide. We selected a total of 238 plant species, which are traditionally used against ticks by native and local communities of Africa (Kenya, Uganda, Zimbabwe, South Africa), Europe (Serbia, Macedonia, Romania), Asia (Pakistan, India) and America (Brazil, Canada), from 56 families. However, only 7 families (i.e. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Meliaceae, Apocynaceae and Solanaceae) represent the major quote (46%) of all plant species. We evaluated the differences in acaricidal and repellent efficacy of different formulations used. In the final section, implications arising from the surveyed anti-tick ethnobotanical knowledge and challenges for its future are discussed.
Crop Research Institute Drnovska 507 161 06 Prague 6 Czech Republic
Department of Parasitology Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17013373
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201203121818.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.09.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27892855
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Pavela, Roman, $d 1970- $u Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507, 161 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic. $7 mzk2005318033
- 245 10
- $a Application of ethnobotanical repellents and acaricides in prevention, control and management of livestock ticks: A review / $c R. Pavela, A. Canale, H. Mehlhorn, G. Benelli,
- 520 9_
- $a Ticks transmit at least the same number or even more pathogens than any other group of blood-feeding arthropods worldwide affecting humans and animals. The eco-friendly control and management of tick vectors in a constantly changing environment is a crucial challenge. Besides the development of vaccines against ticks, IPM practices aimed at reducing tick interactions with livestock, emerging pheromone-based control tools, and few biological control agents, the extensive employment of acaricides and tick repellents still remain the most effective and ready-to-use strategies. However, the former is limited by the development of growing resistances as well as environmental concerns. Exploiting plants and plant products as sources of effective tick repellents and acaricides represents a promising strategy. In this scenario, the preservation of ethnobotanical information on repellent and acaricidal potential of plants is crucial. Here, we evaluated relevant information published in recent years, focused on plants used as repellents and acaricides against tick vectors in different regions worldwide. We selected a total of 238 plant species, which are traditionally used against ticks by native and local communities of Africa (Kenya, Uganda, Zimbabwe, South Africa), Europe (Serbia, Macedonia, Romania), Asia (Pakistan, India) and America (Brazil, Canada), from 56 families. However, only 7 families (i.e. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Meliaceae, Apocynaceae and Solanaceae) represent the major quote (46%) of all plant species. We evaluated the differences in acaricidal and repellent efficacy of different formulations used. In the final section, implications arising from the surveyed anti-tick ethnobotanical knowledge and challenges for its future are discussed.
- 650 _2
- $a akaricidy $x farmakologie $7 D056810
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a repelenty proti hmyzu $x farmakologie $7 D007302
- 650 12
- $a dobytek $7 D058751
- 650 _2
- $a infestace klíšťaty $x farmakoterapie $x prevence a kontrola $x veterinární $7 D013984
- 650 _2
- $a klíšťata $x účinky léků $7 D013987
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Canale, Angelo $u Insect Behaviour Group, Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Mehlhorn, Heinz $u Department of Parasitology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Benelli, Giovanni $u Insect Behaviour Group, Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: benelli.giovanni@gmail.com.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00158152 $t Research in veterinary science $x 1532-2661 $g Roč. 109, č. - (2016), s. 1-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27892855 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201203121816 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1199838 $s 974151
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 109 $c - $d 1-9 $e 20160909 $i 1532-2661 $m Research in Veterinary Science $n Res. Vet. Sci. $x MED00158152
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413