-
Something wrong with this record ?
Fertilization success of sterlet Acipenser ruthenus and Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii gametes under conditions of heterospecific mating
M. Havelka, H. Šachlová, A. Shaliutina-Kolešová, M. Rodina,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Fertilization in Vitro veterinary MeSH
- Hybridization, Genetic MeSH
- Sperm-Ovum Interactions genetics physiology MeSH
- Sperm Motility MeSH
- Oocytes physiology MeSH
- Fishes genetics physiology MeSH
- Spermatozoa physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Species may be prevented from interspecific hybridization by a number of different reproductive barriers that operate precopulatory and postcopulatory. In situation, when natural precopulatory reproductive barriers are affected by anthropogenic factors, postcopulatory reproductive barriers may be important for maintaining gametic isolation and hence preventing interspecific hybridization. This is highly topical in sturgeon (order Acipenseriformes) which exhibits remarkable ease of interspecific hybridization. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the fertilization success of Acipenser ruthenus and Acipenser baerii spermatozoa under the interspecific competitive conditions and assessed, whether their spermatozoa tend to differentially fertilize eggs of conspecifics. We set up several in vitro fertilization experiments: (i) pooled eggs of both species were fertilized by sperm of each species separately; (ii) eggs of each species were fertilized by pooled sperm; (iii) pooled eggs were fertilized by pooled sperm and (iv) purebred and hybrid control groups. Using parental assignment by molecular markers, we found that when these species competed in pooled sperm, 78.9% of progeny were sired by A. ruthenus and 21.1% by A. baerii, demonstrating higher fertilization success for the former, irrespective of conspecificity of fertilized eggs. When pooled eggs were inseminated by A. ruthenus or A. baerii sperm separately, progeny almost equally comprised hybrid and purebred individuals. Hence, neither A. ruthenus nor A. baerii eggs showed a tendency to biased fertilization by spermatozoa of conspecific males. These findings together show that there may not be postcopulatory mechanisms preventing hybridization between A. ruthenus and A. baerii.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17013499
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170425100542.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.09.012 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27692499
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Havelka, M $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic. Electronic address: havelm02@frov.jcu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Fertilization success of sterlet Acipenser ruthenus and Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii gametes under conditions of heterospecific mating / $c M. Havelka, H. Šachlová, A. Shaliutina-Kolešová, M. Rodina,
- 520 9_
- $a Species may be prevented from interspecific hybridization by a number of different reproductive barriers that operate precopulatory and postcopulatory. In situation, when natural precopulatory reproductive barriers are affected by anthropogenic factors, postcopulatory reproductive barriers may be important for maintaining gametic isolation and hence preventing interspecific hybridization. This is highly topical in sturgeon (order Acipenseriformes) which exhibits remarkable ease of interspecific hybridization. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the fertilization success of Acipenser ruthenus and Acipenser baerii spermatozoa under the interspecific competitive conditions and assessed, whether their spermatozoa tend to differentially fertilize eggs of conspecifics. We set up several in vitro fertilization experiments: (i) pooled eggs of both species were fertilized by sperm of each species separately; (ii) eggs of each species were fertilized by pooled sperm; (iii) pooled eggs were fertilized by pooled sperm and (iv) purebred and hybrid control groups. Using parental assignment by molecular markers, we found that when these species competed in pooled sperm, 78.9% of progeny were sired by A. ruthenus and 21.1% by A. baerii, demonstrating higher fertilization success for the former, irrespective of conspecificity of fertilized eggs. When pooled eggs were inseminated by A. ruthenus or A. baerii sperm separately, progeny almost equally comprised hybrid and purebred individuals. Hence, neither A. ruthenus nor A. baerii eggs showed a tendency to biased fertilization by spermatozoa of conspecific males. These findings together show that there may not be postcopulatory mechanisms preventing hybridization between A. ruthenus and A. baerii.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fertilizace in vitro $x veterinární $7 D005307
- 650 _2
- $a ryby $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D005399
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace genetická $7 D006824
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a oocyty $x fyziologie $7 D009865
- 650 _2
- $a motilita spermií $7 D013081
- 650 _2
- $a interakce spermie a vajíčka $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D013084
- 650 _2
- $a spermie $x fyziologie $7 D013094
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Šachlová, H $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Shaliutina-Kolešová, A $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rodina, M $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006160 $t Animal reproduction science $x 1873-2232 $g Roč. 174, č. - (2016), s. 107-113
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27692499 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170425100900 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1199964 $s 974277
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 174 $c - $d 107-113 $e 20160916 $i 1873-2232 $m Animal reproduction science $n Anim Reprod Sci $x MED00006160
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413