Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

BT. Haylen, CF. Maher, MD. Barber, S. Camargo, V. Dandolu, A. Digesu, HB. Goldman, M. Huser, AL. Milani, PA. Moran, GN. Schaer, MI. Withagen,

. 2016 ; 27 (4) : 655-84.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17014027
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do 2017-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do 2017-12-31

INTRODUCTION: The terminology for female pelvic floor prolapse (POP) should be defined and organized in a clinically-based consensus Report. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give a coding to definitions. An extensive process of fourteen rounds of internal and external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS: A Terminology Report for female POP, encompassing over 230 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction and POP. Female-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology and MRI) and conservative and surgical managements are major additions and appropriate figures have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts and measurements, in use in the literature and offering further research potential, but requiring further validation, have been included as an appendix. Interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for female POP has been produced to aid clinical practice and research.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17014027
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170426115820.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-016-3003-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26984443
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Haylen, Bernard T $u University of New South Wales, Suite 904, St Vincent's Clinic, 438 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, 2010, N.S.W, Australia. bernard@haylen.co.
245    13
$a An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) / $c BT. Haylen, CF. Maher, MD. Barber, S. Camargo, V. Dandolu, A. Digesu, HB. Goldman, M. Huser, AL. Milani, PA. Moran, GN. Schaer, MI. Withagen,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The terminology for female pelvic floor prolapse (POP) should be defined and organized in a clinically-based consensus Report. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give a coding to definitions. An extensive process of fourteen rounds of internal and external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS: A Terminology Report for female POP, encompassing over 230 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction and POP. Female-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology and MRI) and conservative and surgical managements are major additions and appropriate figures have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts and measurements, in use in the literature and offering further research potential, but requiring further validation, have been included as an appendix. Interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for female POP has been produced to aid clinical practice and research.
650    _2
$a konsensus $7 D032921
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a gynekologie $7 D006176
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D056887
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a společnosti lékařské $7 D012955
650    12
$a terminologie jako téma $7 D009626
650    12
$a urologie $7 D014572
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Maher, Christopher F $u University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
700    1_
$a Barber, Matthew D $u Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
700    1_
$a Camargo, Sérgio $u Hospital Presidente Varga, Porto-Alegre-RS, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Dandolu, Vani $u University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
700    1_
$a Digesu, Alex $u St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Goldman, Howard B $u Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
700    1_
$a Huser, Martin $u Brno University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Milani, Alfredo L $u Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Moran, Paul A $u Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK.
700    1_
$a Schaer, Gabriel N $u Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Withagen, Mariëlla I J $u University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands.
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 27, č. 4 (2016), s. 655-84
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26984443 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170426120139 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200492 $s 974805
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 27 $c 4 $d 655-84 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...