• Something wrong with this record ?

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in routine rheumatology practice: data from Central and Eastern European countries

P. Mandl, A. Baranauskaite, N. Damjanov, M. Hojnik, R. Kurucz, O. Nagy, P. Nemec, D. Niedermayer, P. Perić, T. Petranova, A. Pille, S. Rednic, V. Vlad, M. Zlnay, PV. Balint,

. 2016 ; 36 (6) : 845-54. [pub] 20160229

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17014072
E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-12-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago

Links

PubMed 26923691
DOI 10.1007/s00296-016-3442-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The main aim was to gain structured insight into the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) in routine rheumatology practices in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In a cross-sectional, observational, international, multicenter survey, a questionnaire was sent to investigational sites in CEE countries. Data on all subsequent routine MSUS examinations, site characteristics, MSUS equipment, and investigators were collected over 6 months or up to 100 examinations per center. A total of 95 physicians at 44 sites in 9 countries provided information on a total of 2810 MSUS examinations. The most frequent diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (34.8 and 14.9 % of cases, respectively). Mean number of joints examined was 6.8. MSUS was most frequently performed for diagnostic purposes (58 %), particularly in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, suspected soft tissue disorders, or osteoarthritis (73.0-85.3 %). In RA patients, 56.3 % of examinations were conducted to monitor disease activity. Nearly all investigations (99 %) had clinical implications, while the results of 78.6 % of examinations (51.6-99.0 %) were deemed useful for patient education. This first standardized multicountry survey performed in CEEs provided a structured documentation of the routine MSUS use in participating countries. The majority of MSUS examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes, whereas one-third was conducted to monitor disease activity in RA. A majority of examinations had an impact on clinical decision making and were also found to be useful for patient education.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17014072
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170426093356.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00296-016-3442-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26923691
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Mandl, Peter $u Division of Rheumatology, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 18-20 Währinger Gürtel, Vienna, Austria. peter.mandl@meduniwien.ac.at. 3rd Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary. peter.mandl@meduniwien.ac.at.
245    10
$a Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in routine rheumatology practice: data from Central and Eastern European countries / $c P. Mandl, A. Baranauskaite, N. Damjanov, M. Hojnik, R. Kurucz, O. Nagy, P. Nemec, D. Niedermayer, P. Perić, T. Petranova, A. Pille, S. Rednic, V. Vlad, M. Zlnay, PV. Balint,
520    9_
$a The main aim was to gain structured insight into the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) in routine rheumatology practices in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In a cross-sectional, observational, international, multicenter survey, a questionnaire was sent to investigational sites in CEE countries. Data on all subsequent routine MSUS examinations, site characteristics, MSUS equipment, and investigators were collected over 6 months or up to 100 examinations per center. A total of 95 physicians at 44 sites in 9 countries provided information on a total of 2810 MSUS examinations. The most frequent diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (34.8 and 14.9 % of cases, respectively). Mean number of joints examined was 6.8. MSUS was most frequently performed for diagnostic purposes (58 %), particularly in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, suspected soft tissue disorders, or osteoarthritis (73.0-85.3 %). In RA patients, 56.3 % of examinations were conducted to monitor disease activity. Nearly all investigations (99 %) had clinical implications, while the results of 78.6 % of examinations (51.6-99.0 %) were deemed useful for patient education. This first standardized multicountry survey performed in CEEs provided a structured documentation of the routine MSUS use in participating countries. The majority of MSUS examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes, whereas one-third was conducted to monitor disease activity in RA. A majority of examinations had an impact on clinical decision making and were also found to be useful for patient education.
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a východní Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005061
650    _2
$a disparity zdravotní péče $x trendy $7 D054625
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a muskuloskeletální systém $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D009141
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $x trendy $7 D010818
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a revmatické nemoci $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D012216
650    _2
$a revmatologie $x trendy $7 D012219
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie $x trendy $x využití $7 D014463
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Baranauskaite, Asta $u Department of Rheumatology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
700    1_
$a Damjanov, Nemanja $u Institute of Rheumatology, University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
700    1_
$a Hojnik, Maja $u Global Medical Affairs Rheumatology, AbbVie, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
700    1_
$a Kurucz, Reka $u 3rd Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Nagy, Orsolya $u AbbVie Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Nemec, Petr $u Department of Rheumatology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Niedermayer, Dora $u 3rd Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Perić, Porin $u Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
700    1_
$a Petranova, Tzvetanka $u Department of Rheumatology, UMHAT St.Iv.Rilsky, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
700    1_
$a Pille, Andres $u East-Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Rednic, Simona $u Department of Rheumatology, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
700    1_
$a Vlad, Violeta $u Department of Rheumatology, Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
700    1_
$a Zlnay, Martin $u Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Rheumatic Diseases, Piestany, Slovak Republic.
700    1_
$a Balint, Peter V $u 3rd Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary.
773    0_
$w MED00004228 $t Rheumatology international $x 1437-160X $g Roč. 36, č. 6 (2016), s. 845-54
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26923691 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170426093714 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200537 $s 974850
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 36 $c 6 $d 845-54 $e 20160229 $i 1437-160X $m Rheumatology international $n Rheumatol Int $x MED00004228
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options