-
Something wrong with this record ?
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study
M. Jurakova, M. Huser, I. Belkov, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, P. Stourac, J. Jarkovsky, P. Ventruba,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Operative Time MeSH
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures MeSH
- Blood Loss, Surgical MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Pain, Postoperative etiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress surgery MeSH
- Suburethral Slings * adverse effects MeSH
- Groin MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence, Urge etiology MeSH
- Urologic Surgical Procedures adverse effects methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient's life quality. RESULTS: Of 285 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 93 patients (32.6 %) were randomized into TOT (n = 48) and SIS groups (n = 45). There were no significant differences in either operating time or blood loss. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in pain scores three (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) and 12 h postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the TOT and SIS groups in objective cure rates (87.0 % vs 90.9 %; p = 0.399) or patient-reported success rates (91.3 % vs 93.2 %; p = 0.999). Incidence of postoperative de novo urgency did not differ between TOT and SIS patients. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophira SIS procedure has 1-year success rates comparable to standard TOT with significantly less groin pain in the early postoperative period. Both methods were safe and effective in terms of postoperative urgency and life quality improvement.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17014205
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170426115843.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26630947
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Jurakova, Michaela $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University Medical School, Obilni trh 11, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study / $c M. Jurakova, M. Huser, I. Belkov, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, P. Stourac, J. Jarkovsky, P. Ventruba,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient's life quality. RESULTS: Of 285 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 93 patients (32.6 %) were randomized into TOT (n = 48) and SIS groups (n = 45). There were no significant differences in either operating time or blood loss. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in pain scores three (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) and 12 h postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the TOT and SIS groups in objective cure rates (87.0 % vs 90.9 %; p = 0.399) or patient-reported success rates (91.3 % vs 93.2 %; p = 0.999). Incidence of postoperative de novo urgency did not differ between TOT and SIS patients. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophira SIS procedure has 1-year success rates comparable to standard TOT with significantly less groin pain in the early postoperative period. Both methods were safe and effective in terms of postoperative urgency and life quality improvement.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení při operaci $7 D016063
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a třísla $7 D006119
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a délka operace $7 D061646
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační bolest $x etiologie $7 D010149
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 12
- $a suburetrální pásky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D053825
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a stresová inkontinence moči $x chirurgie $7 D014550
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní inkontinence $x etiologie $7 D053202
- 650 _2
- $a urologické chirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D013520
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Huser, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. martin.huser@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Belkov, Ivan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Janku, Petr $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hudecek, Robert $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Stourac, Petr $u Department of Paediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Cernopolni 9, 662 63, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses of Masaryk University Medical School, Kamenice 126/3, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ventruba, Pavel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 27, č. 5 (2016), s. 791-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26630947 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170426120202 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200670 $s 974983
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 27 $c 5 $d 791-6 $e 20151202 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413
