-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study
M. Jurakova, M. Huser, I. Belkov, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, P. Stourac, J. Jarkovsky, P. Ventruba,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- délka operace MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem MeSH
- krvácení při operaci MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pooperační bolest etiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stresová inkontinence moči chirurgie MeSH
- suburetrální pásky * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- třísla MeSH
- urgentní inkontinence etiologie MeSH
- urologické chirurgické výkony škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient's life quality. RESULTS: Of 285 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 93 patients (32.6 %) were randomized into TOT (n = 48) and SIS groups (n = 45). There were no significant differences in either operating time or blood loss. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in pain scores three (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) and 12 h postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the TOT and SIS groups in objective cure rates (87.0 % vs 90.9 %; p = 0.399) or patient-reported success rates (91.3 % vs 93.2 %; p = 0.999). Incidence of postoperative de novo urgency did not differ between TOT and SIS patients. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophira SIS procedure has 1-year success rates comparable to standard TOT with significantly less groin pain in the early postoperative period. Both methods were safe and effective in terms of postoperative urgency and life quality improvement.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17014205
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170426115843.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26630947
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Jurakova, Michaela $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University Medical School, Obilni trh 11, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study / $c M. Jurakova, M. Huser, I. Belkov, P. Janku, R. Hudecek, P. Stourac, J. Jarkovsky, P. Ventruba,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient's life quality. RESULTS: Of 285 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 93 patients (32.6 %) were randomized into TOT (n = 48) and SIS groups (n = 45). There were no significant differences in either operating time or blood loss. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in pain scores three (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) and 12 h postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the TOT and SIS groups in objective cure rates (87.0 % vs 90.9 %; p = 0.399) or patient-reported success rates (91.3 % vs 93.2 %; p = 0.999). Incidence of postoperative de novo urgency did not differ between TOT and SIS patients. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophira SIS procedure has 1-year success rates comparable to standard TOT with significantly less groin pain in the early postoperative period. Both methods were safe and effective in terms of postoperative urgency and life quality improvement.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení při operaci $7 D016063
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a třísla $7 D006119
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a délka operace $7 D061646
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační bolest $x etiologie $7 D010149
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 12
- $a suburetrální pásky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D053825
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a stresová inkontinence moči $x chirurgie $7 D014550
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní inkontinence $x etiologie $7 D053202
- 650 _2
- $a urologické chirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D013520
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Huser, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. martin.huser@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Belkov, Ivan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Janku, Petr $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hudecek, Robert $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Stourac, Petr $u Department of Paediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Cernopolni 9, 662 63, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses of Masaryk University Medical School, Kamenice 126/3, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ventruba, Pavel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Jihlavska 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 27, č. 5 (2016), s. 791-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26630947 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170426120202 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200670 $s 974983
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 27 $c 5 $d 791-6 $e 20151202 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413
