• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma and Adult Liver Transplantation: Proposal for a Prognostic Score Based on the Analysis of the ELTR-ELITA Registry

Q. Lai, E. Feys, V. Karam, R. Adam, J. Klempnauer, M. Oliverius, V. Mazzaferro, A. Pascher, P. Remiszewski, H. Isoniemi, J. Pirenne, A. Foss, BG. Ericzon, S. Markovic, JP. Lerut, . ,

. 2017 ; 101 (3) : 555-564.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17023286

BACKGROUND: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare vascular tumor which has an intermediate aggressive behavior. Although the value of liver transplantation (LT) is well established, its place in the management of HEHE is still unclear. The aim of this study is to confirm, based on a very large patient cohort, the value of LT in the management of HEHE and to identify risk factors for post-LT recurrence. METHODS: The outcome of 149 transplant recipients with HEHE recorded in the European Liver Transplant Registry during the period November 1984 to May 2014 was analyzed. Median post-LT follow-up was 7.6 years (interquartile range, 2.8-14.4). RESULTS: Cox regression analysis showed that macrovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 4.8; P < 0.001), pre-LT waiting time of 120 days or less (HR, 2.6; P = 0.01) and hilar lymph node invasion (HR = 2.2; P = 0.03), but not pre-LT extrahepatic disease, were significant risk factors for recurrence. These findings, which were also confirmed in a propensity score analysis, allowed the development of a HEHE-LT score enabling stratification of patients in relation to their risk of tumor recurrence. Patients with a score of 2 or less had a much better 5-year disease-free survival compared to those having a score of 6 or higher (93.9% vs 38.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of this (largest in the world) HEHE adult liver recipient cohort clearly confirms the value of LT in the treatment of this rare disorder and also permits identification of patients at risk of posttransplant recurrence. Posttransplant follow-up should take the HEHE-LT score into account. Extrahepatic disease localization is reconfirmed not to be a contraindication for LT.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023286
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170830100703.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/TP.0000000000001603 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28212256
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lai, Quirino $u 1 Starzl Abdominal Transplant Unit, University Hospitals St. Luc, Université catholique Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. 2 Centre Hépatobiliaire Paul Brousse, Paris, France. 3 Medizinsche Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany. 4 Transplancenter IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic. 5 Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy. 6 Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany. 7 Department of General Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 8 UCJ Helsingfors, Helsinki, Finland. 9 Department Abdominal transplantation Surgery, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Gasthuisberg KULeuven, Belgium. 10 Rikshospitalet, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway. 11 Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. 12 University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
245    10
$a Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma and Adult Liver Transplantation: Proposal for a Prognostic Score Based on the Analysis of the ELTR-ELITA Registry / $c Q. Lai, E. Feys, V. Karam, R. Adam, J. Klempnauer, M. Oliverius, V. Mazzaferro, A. Pascher, P. Remiszewski, H. Isoniemi, J. Pirenne, A. Foss, BG. Ericzon, S. Markovic, JP. Lerut, . ,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare vascular tumor which has an intermediate aggressive behavior. Although the value of liver transplantation (LT) is well established, its place in the management of HEHE is still unclear. The aim of this study is to confirm, based on a very large patient cohort, the value of LT in the management of HEHE and to identify risk factors for post-LT recurrence. METHODS: The outcome of 149 transplant recipients with HEHE recorded in the European Liver Transplant Registry during the period November 1984 to May 2014 was analyzed. Median post-LT follow-up was 7.6 years (interquartile range, 2.8-14.4). RESULTS: Cox regression analysis showed that macrovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 4.8; P < 0.001), pre-LT waiting time of 120 days or less (HR, 2.6; P = 0.01) and hilar lymph node invasion (HR = 2.2; P = 0.03), but not pre-LT extrahepatic disease, were significant risk factors for recurrence. These findings, which were also confirmed in a propensity score analysis, allowed the development of a HEHE-LT score enabling stratification of patients in relation to their risk of tumor recurrence. Patients with a score of 2 or less had a much better 5-year disease-free survival compared to those having a score of 6 or higher (93.9% vs 38.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of this (largest in the world) HEHE adult liver recipient cohort clearly confirms the value of LT in the treatment of this rare disorder and also permits identification of patients at risk of posttransplant recurrence. Posttransplant follow-up should take the HEHE-LT score into account. Extrahepatic disease localization is reconfirmed not to be a contraindication for LT.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    12
$a metody pro podporu rozhodování $7 D003661
650    _2
$a přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a přežívání štěpu $7 D006085
650    _2
$a epiteloidní hemangioendoteliom $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D018323
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
650    _2
$a nádory jater $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D008113
650    12
$a transplantace jater $x škodlivé účinky $x mortalita $7 D016031
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    _2
$a neoadjuvantní terapie $7 D020360
650    _2
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
650    _2
$a výběr pacientů $7 D018579
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
650    _2
$a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
650    _2
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a seznamy čekatelů $7 D014850
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Feys, Estelle
700    1_
$a Karam, Vincent
700    1_
$a Adam, Rene $7 gn_A_00001124
700    1_
$a Klempnauer, Jurgen
700    1_
$a Oliverius, Martin
700    1_
$a Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
700    1_
$a Pascher, Andreas
700    1_
$a Remiszewski, Piotr
700    1_
$a Isoniemi, Helena
700    1_
$a Pirenne, Jacques
700    1_
$a Foss, Aksel
700    1_
$a Ericzon, Bo G
700    1_
$a Markovic, Sasa
700    1_
$a Lerut, Jan P
700    1_
$a ,
773    0_
$w MED00010695 $t Transplantation $x 1534-6080 $g Roč. 101, č. 3 (2017), s. 555-564
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28212256 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170830101251 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1238967 $s 984199
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 101 $c 3 $d 555-564 $i 1534-6080 $m Transplantation $n Transplantation $x MED00010695
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...