-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Novel Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing Human Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) as Research and Theranostic Tools
Z. Nováková, CA. Foss, BT. Copeland, V. Morath, P. Baranová, B. Havlínová, A. Skerra, MG. Pomper, C. Barinka,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28247415
DOI
10.1002/pros.23311
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antigeny povrchové * imunologie MeSH
- glutamátkarboxypeptidasa II * antagonisté a inhibitory imunologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky imunologie farmakologie MeSH
- myší monoklonální protilátky imunologie farmakologie MeSH
- myši MeSH
- nádory prostaty * farmakoterapie imunologie MeSH
- prostata * imunologie patologie MeSH
- teranostická nanomedicína metody MeSH
- xenogenní modely - testy antitumorózní aktivity metody MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a validated target for the imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Here, we report the detailed characterization of four novel murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing human PSMA as well as PSMA orthologs from different species. METHODS: Performance of purified mAbs was assayed using a comprehensive panel of in vitro experimental setups including Western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, ELISA, flow cytometry, and surface-plasmon resonance. Furthermore, a mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer was used to compare the suitability of the mAbs for in vivo applications. RESULTS: All mAbs demonstrate high specificity for PSMA as documented by the lack of cross-reactivity to unrelated human proteins. The 3F11 and 1A11 mAbs bind linear epitopes spanning residues 226-243 and 271-288 of human PSMA, respectively. 3F11 is also suitable for the detection of PSMA orthologs from mouse, pig, dog, and rat in experimental setups where the denatured form of PSMA is used. 5D3 and 5B1 mAbs recognize distinct surface-exposed conformational epitopes and are useful for targeting PSMA in its native conformation. Most importantly, using a mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer we show that both the intact 5D3 and its Fab fragment are suitable for in vivo imaging. CONCLUSIONS: With apparent affinities of 0.14 and 1.2 nM as determined by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively, 5D3 has approximately 10-fold higher affinity for PSMA than the clinically validated mAb J591 and, therefore, is a prime candidate for the development of next-generation theranostics to target PSMA. Prostate 77:749-764, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031001
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171027103810.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/pros.23311 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28247415
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Nováková, Zora $u Laboratory of Structural Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Novel Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing Human Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) as Research and Theranostic Tools / $c Z. Nováková, CA. Foss, BT. Copeland, V. Morath, P. Baranová, B. Havlínová, A. Skerra, MG. Pomper, C. Barinka,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a validated target for the imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Here, we report the detailed characterization of four novel murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing human PSMA as well as PSMA orthologs from different species. METHODS: Performance of purified mAbs was assayed using a comprehensive panel of in vitro experimental setups including Western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, ELISA, flow cytometry, and surface-plasmon resonance. Furthermore, a mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer was used to compare the suitability of the mAbs for in vivo applications. RESULTS: All mAbs demonstrate high specificity for PSMA as documented by the lack of cross-reactivity to unrelated human proteins. The 3F11 and 1A11 mAbs bind linear epitopes spanning residues 226-243 and 271-288 of human PSMA, respectively. 3F11 is also suitable for the detection of PSMA orthologs from mouse, pig, dog, and rat in experimental setups where the denatured form of PSMA is used. 5D3 and 5B1 mAbs recognize distinct surface-exposed conformational epitopes and are useful for targeting PSMA in its native conformation. Most importantly, using a mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer we show that both the intact 5D3 and its Fab fragment are suitable for in vivo imaging. CONCLUSIONS: With apparent affinities of 0.14 and 1.2 nM as determined by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively, 5D3 has approximately 10-fold higher affinity for PSMA than the clinically validated mAb J591 and, therefore, is a prime candidate for the development of next-generation theranostics to target PSMA. Prostate 77:749-764, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x imunologie $x farmakologie $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a myší monoklonální protilátky $x imunologie $x farmakologie $7 D058846
- 650 12
- $a antigeny povrchové $x imunologie $7 D000954
- 650 12
- $a glutamátkarboxypeptidasa II $x antagonisté a inhibitory $x imunologie $7 D043425
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 12
- $a prostata $x imunologie $x patologie $7 D011467
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty $x farmakoterapie $x imunologie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a teranostická nanomedicína $x metody $7 D000068936
- 650 _2
- $a xenogenní modely - testy antitumorózní aktivity $x metody $7 D023041
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Foss, Catherine A $u The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
- 700 1_
- $a Copeland, Benjamin T $u The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
- 700 1_
- $a Morath, Volker $u Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science (CIPS-M) and Lehrstuhl für Biologische Chemie, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Baranová, Petra $u Laboratory of Structural Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Havlínová, Barbora $u Laboratory of Structural Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Skerra, Arne $u Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science (CIPS-M) and Lehrstuhl für Biologische Chemie, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Pomper, Martin G $u The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
- 700 1_
- $a Barinka, Cyril $u Laboratory of Structural Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010484 $t The Prostate $x 1097-0045 $g Roč. 77, č. 7 (2017), s. 749-764
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28247415 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171027103855 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1254594 $s 992028
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 77 $c 7 $d 749-764 $e 20170301 $i 1097-0045 $m The Prostate $n Prostate $x MED00010484
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025