Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Asymmetry and integration of cellular morphology in Micrasterias compereana

J. Neustupa,

. 2017 ; 17 (1) : 1. [pub] 20170103

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Unicellular green algae of the genus Micrasterias (Desmidiales) have complex cells with multiple lobes and indentations, and therefore, they are considered model organisms for research on plant cell morphogenesis and variation. Micrasterias cells have a typical biradial symmetric arrangement and multiple terminal lobules. They are composed of two semicells that can be further differentiated into three structural components: the polar lobe and two lateral lobes. Experimental studies suggested that these cellular parts have specific evolutionary patterns and develop independently. In this study, different geometric morphometric methods were used to address whether the semicells of Micrasterias compereana are truly not integrated with regard to the covariation of their shape data. In addition, morphological integration within the semicells was studied to ascertain whether individual lobes constitute distinct units that may be considered as separate modules. In parallel, I sought to determine whether the main components of morphological asymmetry could highlight underlying cytomorphogenetic processes that could indicate preferred directions of variation, canalizing evolutionary changes in cellular morphology. RESULTS: Differentiation between opposite semicells constituted the most prominent subset of cellular asymmetry. The second important asymmetric pattern, recovered by the Procrustes ANOVA models, described differentiation between the adjacent lobules within the quadrants. Other asymmetric components proved to be relatively unimportant. Opposite semicells were shown to be completely independent of each other on the basis of the partial least squares analysis analyses. In addition, polar lobes were weakly integrated with adjacent lateral lobes. Conversely, higher covariance levels between the two lateral lobes of the same semicell indicated mutual interconnection and significant integration between these parts. CONCLUSIONS: Micrasterias cells are composed of several successively disintegrated parts. These integration patterns concurred with presumed scenarios of morphological evolution within the lineage. In addition, asymmetric differentiation in the shape of the lobules involves two major patterns: asymmetry across the isthmus axis and among the adjacent lobules. Notably, asymmetry among the adjacent lobules may be related to evolutionary differentiation among species, but it may also point out developmental instability related to environmental factors.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031170
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171025115432.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12862-016-0855-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28049419
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Neustupa, Jiří $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. neustupa@natur.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Asymmetry and integration of cellular morphology in Micrasterias compereana / $c J. Neustupa,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Unicellular green algae of the genus Micrasterias (Desmidiales) have complex cells with multiple lobes and indentations, and therefore, they are considered model organisms for research on plant cell morphogenesis and variation. Micrasterias cells have a typical biradial symmetric arrangement and multiple terminal lobules. They are composed of two semicells that can be further differentiated into three structural components: the polar lobe and two lateral lobes. Experimental studies suggested that these cellular parts have specific evolutionary patterns and develop independently. In this study, different geometric morphometric methods were used to address whether the semicells of Micrasterias compereana are truly not integrated with regard to the covariation of their shape data. In addition, morphological integration within the semicells was studied to ascertain whether individual lobes constitute distinct units that may be considered as separate modules. In parallel, I sought to determine whether the main components of morphological asymmetry could highlight underlying cytomorphogenetic processes that could indicate preferred directions of variation, canalizing evolutionary changes in cellular morphology. RESULTS: Differentiation between opposite semicells constituted the most prominent subset of cellular asymmetry. The second important asymmetric pattern, recovered by the Procrustes ANOVA models, described differentiation between the adjacent lobules within the quadrants. Other asymmetric components proved to be relatively unimportant. Opposite semicells were shown to be completely independent of each other on the basis of the partial least squares analysis analyses. In addition, polar lobes were weakly integrated with adjacent lateral lobes. Conversely, higher covariance levels between the two lateral lobes of the same semicell indicated mutual interconnection and significant integration between these parts. CONCLUSIONS: Micrasterias cells are composed of several successively disintegrated parts. These integration patterns concurred with presumed scenarios of morphological evolution within the lineage. In addition, asymmetric differentiation in the shape of the lobules involves two major patterns: asymmetry across the isthmus axis and among the adjacent lobules. Notably, asymmetry among the adjacent lobules may be related to evolutionary differentiation among species, but it may also point out developmental instability related to environmental factors.
650    _2
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a Micrasterias $x anatomie a histologie $7 D058120
650    _2
$a morfogeneze $7 D009024
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
773    0_
$w MED00006797 $t BMC evolutionary biology $x 1471-2148 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2017), s. 1
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28049419 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171025115514 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254763 $s 992197
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 17 $c 1 $d 1 $e 20170103 $i 1471-2148 $m BMC evolutionary biology $n BMC Evol Biol $x MED00006797
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...