Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context

P. Samaš, J. Rutila, T. Grim,

. 2016 ; 16 (1) : 255. [pub] 20161125

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17031268

BACKGROUND: Co-evolutionary arms-races result in spatio-temporally dynamic relationships between interacting species, e.g., brood parasites and their avian hosts. However, majority of avian co-evolutionary studies are limited to "snap-shots" of a single breeding season in an open-nesting host. In a long-term study (11 breeding seasons), we explored a unique system between the brood parasitic common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and its host, the common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) which is exceptional among all cuckoo hosts due to being a cavity nester. Conditions in cavities are different from open nests, e.g., lower risks of predation, more favourable microclimate, increased risks of unsuccessful eviction of host offspring by the cuckoo nestling. Different conditions in cavities thus can be expected to shape parasite-host coevolution differently from what is typically studied in open nesting hosts. RESULTS: In our highly parasitised nest-box population (32.5%, n = 569 nests) only 35.7% of cuckoo eggs were laid into the nest cup and incubated by redstarts. Host nests shifted availability to later into the breeding season from 2006 to 2016 and cuckoos followed this trend by also shifting their timing of parasitism. Although previous studies revealed that redstarts selectively eject experimental non-mimetic eggs (desertion was not a specific response to foreign eggs), the hosts never ejected naturally-laid cuckoo eggs or cuckoo eggs cross-fostered into naturally non-parasitised nests. We solve the long-standing debate about the origin of cuckoo eggs found on the nest rim: we gained the first direct video-recording evidence that eggs found on the nest rim were mislaid by parasites and not ejected by hosts. Naturally-parasitised nests were deserted more often (18.6%) than control non-parasitized nests (5.6%) or nests artificially parasitised by us (1.4%). This suggests that the sight of the laying cuckoo female is the primary cue that triggers egg rejection (by desertion) in this host. Review of data from this and other study sites (10 populations, n = 853 experiments) demonstrates high variability in rejection rates and shows that populations facing higher parasitism rates reject parasitic eggs with higher frequencies. Surprisingly, cuckoo chicks either growing solitarily or with redstart chicks did not differ in their fledging success. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the redstart is an ideal model system to study the flexibility and limits of brood parasite-host co-evolution in an extreme ecological setting.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031268
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171025115444.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12862-016-0835-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27887566
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Samaš, Peter $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc, 77146, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context / $c P. Samaš, J. Rutila, T. Grim,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Co-evolutionary arms-races result in spatio-temporally dynamic relationships between interacting species, e.g., brood parasites and their avian hosts. However, majority of avian co-evolutionary studies are limited to "snap-shots" of a single breeding season in an open-nesting host. In a long-term study (11 breeding seasons), we explored a unique system between the brood parasitic common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and its host, the common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) which is exceptional among all cuckoo hosts due to being a cavity nester. Conditions in cavities are different from open nests, e.g., lower risks of predation, more favourable microclimate, increased risks of unsuccessful eviction of host offspring by the cuckoo nestling. Different conditions in cavities thus can be expected to shape parasite-host coevolution differently from what is typically studied in open nesting hosts. RESULTS: In our highly parasitised nest-box population (32.5%, n = 569 nests) only 35.7% of cuckoo eggs were laid into the nest cup and incubated by redstarts. Host nests shifted availability to later into the breeding season from 2006 to 2016 and cuckoos followed this trend by also shifting their timing of parasitism. Although previous studies revealed that redstarts selectively eject experimental non-mimetic eggs (desertion was not a specific response to foreign eggs), the hosts never ejected naturally-laid cuckoo eggs or cuckoo eggs cross-fostered into naturally non-parasitised nests. We solve the long-standing debate about the origin of cuckoo eggs found on the nest rim: we gained the first direct video-recording evidence that eggs found on the nest rim were mislaid by parasites and not ejected by hosts. Naturally-parasitised nests were deserted more often (18.6%) than control non-parasitized nests (5.6%) or nests artificially parasitised by us (1.4%). This suggests that the sight of the laying cuckoo female is the primary cue that triggers egg rejection (by desertion) in this host. Review of data from this and other study sites (10 populations, n = 853 experiments) demonstrates high variability in rejection rates and shows that populations facing higher parasitism rates reject parasitic eggs with higher frequencies. Surprisingly, cuckoo chicks either growing solitarily or with redstart chicks did not differ in their fledging success. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the redstart is an ideal model system to study the flexibility and limits of brood parasite-host co-evolution in an extreme ecological setting.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a ptáci $x fyziologie $7 D001717
650    12
$a ekologie $7 D004463
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a Finsko $7 D005387
650    _2
$a zeměpis $7 D005843
650    12
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    _2
$a hnízdění $x fyziologie $7 D009425
650    _2
$a kladení vajíček $x fyziologie $7 D010058
650    _2
$a ovum $x fyziologie $7 D010063
650    _2
$a paraziti $x fyziologie $7 D010271
650    _2
$a Passeriformes $x fyziologie $7 D046109
650    _2
$a roční období $7 D012621
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Rutila, Jarkko $u , Kannelkatu 5 as 26, Lappeenranta, Finland.
700    1_
$a Grim, Tomáš $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc, 77146, Czech Republic. tomas.grim@upol.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00006797 $t BMC evolutionary biology $x 1471-2148 $g Roč. 16, č. 1 (2016), s. 255
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27887566 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171025115526 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254861 $s 992295
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 16 $c 1 $d 255 $e 20161125 $i 1471-2148 $m BMC evolutionary biology $n BMC Evol Biol $x MED00006797
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...