-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection
P. Ihnát, P. Guňková, M. Peteja, P. Vávra, A. Pelikán, P. Zonča,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1987-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- anastomóza chirurgická metody MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- chirurgické stomie MeSH
- chirurgie trávicího traktu metody MeSH
- délka pobytu MeSH
- ileostomie metody MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- laparoskopie metody MeSH
- laparotomie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory rekta chirurgie MeSH
- netěsnost anastomózy epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie chirurgie MeSH
- rektum chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- střevní obstrukce epidemiologie chirurgie MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage presents the most feared complication after low anterior resection (LAR). A proximal diversion of the gastrointestinal tract is recommended to avoid septic complications of anastomotic leakage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of diverting ileostomy (DI) created during laparoscopic LAR because of low rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical cohort study conducted to assess outcomes of laparoscopic LAR with/without DI in a single institution within a 6-year period. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were enrolled in the study (73 patients without DI, 78 patients with DI). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding demographic and clinical features. Overall 30-day morbidity rates were significantly lower in patients without DI (23.3 vs. 42.3 %, P = 0.013). Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in patients without DI (9.6 vs. 2.5 %, P = 0.090); surgical intervention was needed in 6.8 % of patients without DI. Post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in the group of patients with DI (11.3 ± 8.5 vs. 8.1 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.013). Stoma-related complications occurred in 42 of 78 (53.8 %) patients with DI; some patients had more than one complication. Acute surgery was needed in 9 patients (11.5 %) because of DI-related complications. Small bowel obstruction due to DI semi-rotation around its longitudinal axis was seen in 3 patients (3.8 %) and presents a distinct complication of DI laparoscopic construction. The mean interval between LAR and DI reversal was more than 8 months; only 19.2 % of patients were reversed without delay (≤4 months). Morbidity after DI reversal was 16.6 %; re-laparotomy was necessary in 2.5 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that DI protects low rectal anastomosis from septic complications at a cost of many stoma-related complications, substantial risk of acute surgery necessity and long stoma periods coupled with decreased quality of life.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031348
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171102132258.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26902615
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Ihnát, Peter $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. peterihnat@yahoo.com. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic. peterihnat@yahoo.com.
- 245 10
- $a Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection / $c P. Ihnát, P. Guňková, M. Peteja, P. Vávra, A. Pelikán, P. Zonča,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage presents the most feared complication after low anterior resection (LAR). A proximal diversion of the gastrointestinal tract is recommended to avoid septic complications of anastomotic leakage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of diverting ileostomy (DI) created during laparoscopic LAR because of low rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical cohort study conducted to assess outcomes of laparoscopic LAR with/without DI in a single institution within a 6-year period. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were enrolled in the study (73 patients without DI, 78 patients with DI). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding demographic and clinical features. Overall 30-day morbidity rates were significantly lower in patients without DI (23.3 vs. 42.3 %, P = 0.013). Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in patients without DI (9.6 vs. 2.5 %, P = 0.090); surgical intervention was needed in 6.8 % of patients without DI. Post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in the group of patients with DI (11.3 ± 8.5 vs. 8.1 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.013). Stoma-related complications occurred in 42 of 78 (53.8 %) patients with DI; some patients had more than one complication. Acute surgery was needed in 9 patients (11.5 %) because of DI-related complications. Small bowel obstruction due to DI semi-rotation around its longitudinal axis was seen in 3 patients (3.8 %) and presents a distinct complication of DI laparoscopic construction. The mean interval between LAR and DI reversal was more than 8 months; only 19.2 % of patients were reversed without delay (≤4 months). Morbidity after DI reversal was 16.6 %; re-laparotomy was necessary in 2.5 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that DI protects low rectal anastomosis from septic complications at a cost of many stoma-related complications, substantial risk of acute surgery necessity and long stoma periods coupled with decreased quality of life.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a anastomóza chirurgická $x metody $7 D000714
- 650 _2
- $a netěsnost anastomózy $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D057868
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgie trávicího traktu $x metody $7 D013505
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ileostomie $x metody $7 D007081
- 650 _2
- $a střevní obstrukce $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D007415
- 650 _2
- $a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
- 650 _2
- $a laparotomie $7 D007813
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a nádory rekta $x chirurgie $7 D012004
- 650 _2
- $a rektum $x chirurgie $7 D012007
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické stomie $7 D054047
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Guňková, Petra $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Peteja, Matúš $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vávra, Petr $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pelikán, Anton $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zonča, Pavel $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004464 $t Surgical endoscopy $x 1432-2218 $g Roč. 30, č. 11 (2016), s. 4809-4816
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26902615 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171102132351 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1254941 $s 992375
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 30 $c 11 $d 4809-4816 $e 20160222 $i 1432-2218 $m Surgical endoscopy $n Surg Endosc $x MED00004464
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025