• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection

P. Ihnát, P. Guňková, M. Peteja, P. Vávra, A. Pelikán, P. Zonča,

. 2016 ; 30 (11) : 4809-4816. [pub] 20160222

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17031348
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1987-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage presents the most feared complication after low anterior resection (LAR). A proximal diversion of the gastrointestinal tract is recommended to avoid septic complications of anastomotic leakage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of diverting ileostomy (DI) created during laparoscopic LAR because of low rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical cohort study conducted to assess outcomes of laparoscopic LAR with/without DI in a single institution within a 6-year period. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were enrolled in the study (73 patients without DI, 78 patients with DI). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding demographic and clinical features. Overall 30-day morbidity rates were significantly lower in patients without DI (23.3 vs. 42.3 %, P = 0.013). Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in patients without DI (9.6 vs. 2.5 %, P = 0.090); surgical intervention was needed in 6.8 % of patients without DI. Post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in the group of patients with DI (11.3 ± 8.5 vs. 8.1 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.013). Stoma-related complications occurred in 42 of 78 (53.8 %) patients with DI; some patients had more than one complication. Acute surgery was needed in 9 patients (11.5 %) because of DI-related complications. Small bowel obstruction due to DI semi-rotation around its longitudinal axis was seen in 3 patients (3.8 %) and presents a distinct complication of DI laparoscopic construction. The mean interval between LAR and DI reversal was more than 8 months; only 19.2 % of patients were reversed without delay (≤4 months). Morbidity after DI reversal was 16.6 %; re-laparotomy was necessary in 2.5 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that DI protects low rectal anastomosis from septic complications at a cost of many stoma-related complications, substantial risk of acute surgery necessity and long stoma periods coupled with decreased quality of life.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031348
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171102132258.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26902615
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Ihnát, Peter $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. peterihnat@yahoo.com. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic. peterihnat@yahoo.com.
245    10
$a Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection / $c P. Ihnát, P. Guňková, M. Peteja, P. Vávra, A. Pelikán, P. Zonča,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage presents the most feared complication after low anterior resection (LAR). A proximal diversion of the gastrointestinal tract is recommended to avoid septic complications of anastomotic leakage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of diverting ileostomy (DI) created during laparoscopic LAR because of low rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical cohort study conducted to assess outcomes of laparoscopic LAR with/without DI in a single institution within a 6-year period. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were enrolled in the study (73 patients without DI, 78 patients with DI). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding demographic and clinical features. Overall 30-day morbidity rates were significantly lower in patients without DI (23.3 vs. 42.3 %, P = 0.013). Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in patients without DI (9.6 vs. 2.5 %, P = 0.090); surgical intervention was needed in 6.8 % of patients without DI. Post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in the group of patients with DI (11.3 ± 8.5 vs. 8.1 ± 6.9 days, P = 0.013). Stoma-related complications occurred in 42 of 78 (53.8 %) patients with DI; some patients had more than one complication. Acute surgery was needed in 9 patients (11.5 %) because of DI-related complications. Small bowel obstruction due to DI semi-rotation around its longitudinal axis was seen in 3 patients (3.8 %) and presents a distinct complication of DI laparoscopic construction. The mean interval between LAR and DI reversal was more than 8 months; only 19.2 % of patients were reversed without delay (≤4 months). Morbidity after DI reversal was 16.6 %; re-laparotomy was necessary in 2.5 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that DI protects low rectal anastomosis from septic complications at a cost of many stoma-related complications, substantial risk of acute surgery necessity and long stoma periods coupled with decreased quality of life.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a anastomóza chirurgická $x metody $7 D000714
650    _2
$a netěsnost anastomózy $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D057868
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a chirurgie trávicího traktu $x metody $7 D013505
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ileostomie $x metody $7 D007081
650    _2
$a střevní obstrukce $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D007415
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x metody $7 D010535
650    _2
$a laparotomie $7 D007813
650    _2
$a délka pobytu $7 D007902
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    _2
$a nádory rekta $x chirurgie $7 D012004
650    _2
$a rektum $x chirurgie $7 D012007
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a chirurgické stomie $7 D054047
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Guňková, Petra $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Peteja, Matúš $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vávra, Petr $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pelikán, Anton $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zonča, Pavel $u Department of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004464 $t Surgical endoscopy $x 1432-2218 $g Roč. 30, č. 11 (2016), s. 4809-4816
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26902615 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171102132351 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254941 $s 992375
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 30 $c 11 $d 4809-4816 $e 20160222 $i 1432-2218 $m Surgical endoscopy $n Surg Endosc $x MED00004464
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...