-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Absence of positive selection on CenH3 in Luzula suggests that holokinetic chromosomes may suppress centromere drive
F. Zedek, P. Bureš,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
27616209
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcw186
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- centromera genetika MeSH
- chromozomy rostlin genetika MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- genom rostlinný genetika MeSH
- histony genetika MeSH
- Magnoliopsida genetika MeSH
- meióza genetika MeSH
- sekvenční analýza DNA MeSH
- sekvenční seřazení MeSH
- selekce (genetika) genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The centromere drive theory explains diversity of eukaryotic centromeres as a consequence of the recurrent conflict between centromeric repeats and centromeric histone H3 (CenH3), in which selfish centromeres exploit meiotic asymmetry and CenH3 evolves adaptively to counterbalance deleterious consequences of driving centromeres. Accordingly, adaptively evolving CenH3 has so far been observed only in eukaryotes with asymmetric meiosis. However, if such evolution is a consequence of centromere drive, it should depend not only on meiotic asymmetry but also on monocentric or holokinetic chromosomal structure. Selective pressures acting on CenH3 have never been investigated in organisms with holokinetic meiosis despite the fact that holokinetic chromosomes have been hypothesized to suppress centromere drive. Therefore, the present study evaluates selective pressures acting on the CenH3 gene in holokinetic organisms for the first time, specifically in the representatives of the plant genus Luzula (Juncaceae), in which the kinetochore formation is not co-localized with any type of centromeric repeat. METHODS: PCR, cloning and sequencing, and database searches were used to obtain coding CenH3 sequences from Luzula species. Codon substitution models were employed to infer selective regimes acting on CenH3 in Luzula KEY RESULTS: In addition to the two previously published CenH3 sequences from L. nivea, 16 new CenH3 sequences have been isolated from 12 Luzula species. Two CenH3 isoforms in Luzula that originated by a duplication event prior to the divergence of analysed species were found. No signs of positive selection acting on CenH3 in Luzula were detected. Instead, evidence was found that selection on CenH3 of Luzula might have been relaxed. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that holokinetism itself may suppress centromere drive and, therefore, holokinetic chromosomes might have evolved as a defence against centromere drive.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031440
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171025115514.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcw186 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27616209
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Zedek, František $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic fzedek@gmail.com.
- 245 10
- $a Absence of positive selection on CenH3 in Luzula suggests that holokinetic chromosomes may suppress centromere drive / $c F. Zedek, P. Bureš,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The centromere drive theory explains diversity of eukaryotic centromeres as a consequence of the recurrent conflict between centromeric repeats and centromeric histone H3 (CenH3), in which selfish centromeres exploit meiotic asymmetry and CenH3 evolves adaptively to counterbalance deleterious consequences of driving centromeres. Accordingly, adaptively evolving CenH3 has so far been observed only in eukaryotes with asymmetric meiosis. However, if such evolution is a consequence of centromere drive, it should depend not only on meiotic asymmetry but also on monocentric or holokinetic chromosomal structure. Selective pressures acting on CenH3 have never been investigated in organisms with holokinetic meiosis despite the fact that holokinetic chromosomes have been hypothesized to suppress centromere drive. Therefore, the present study evaluates selective pressures acting on the CenH3 gene in holokinetic organisms for the first time, specifically in the representatives of the plant genus Luzula (Juncaceae), in which the kinetochore formation is not co-localized with any type of centromeric repeat. METHODS: PCR, cloning and sequencing, and database searches were used to obtain coding CenH3 sequences from Luzula species. Codon substitution models were employed to infer selective regimes acting on CenH3 in Luzula KEY RESULTS: In addition to the two previously published CenH3 sequences from L. nivea, 16 new CenH3 sequences have been isolated from 12 Luzula species. Two CenH3 isoforms in Luzula that originated by a duplication event prior to the divergence of analysed species were found. No signs of positive selection acting on CenH3 in Luzula were detected. Instead, evidence was found that selection on CenH3 of Luzula might have been relaxed. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that holokinetism itself may suppress centromere drive and, therefore, holokinetic chromosomes might have evolved as a defence against centromere drive.
- 650 _2
- $a Magnoliopsida $x genetika $7 D019684
- 650 _2
- $a centromera $x genetika $7 D002503
- 650 _2
- $a chromozomy rostlin $x genetika $7 D032461
- 650 _2
- $a genom rostlinný $x genetika $7 D018745
- 650 _2
- $a histony $x genetika $7 D006657
- 650 _2
- $a meióza $x genetika $7 D008540
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a selekce (genetika) $x genetika $7 D012641
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční seřazení $7 D016415
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bureš, Petr $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 118, č. 7 (2016), s. 1347-1352
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27616209 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171025115557 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1255033 $s 992467
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 118 $c 7 $d 1347-1352 $e 20160910 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025